[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021
potiuk commented on issue #16456: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866700502 Callng for last vote so last chance to test before we release. @mmenarguezpear @Junnplus @codenamestif @gabrielsyapse @uranusjr @Dr-Denzy @jpyen @jacobhjkim @zachliu @thejens @p-kachalov @sunki-hong @sjvanrossum @subkanthi @avocadomaster @jlaneve @sunkickr @malthe @yesemsanthoshkumar @Visya @andrewgodwin @dimberman @msumit @grassten @pgillet @dstandish @sfc-gh-madkins @ashb @tegardp -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021
potiuk commented on issue #16456: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866362942 > Hello. Regarding #13796, I did make a quick test before merging the PR (the file was there and was not empty) but I can't make a deeper test due to health reasons. I am sorry No worries! thanks for your contributions so far @JavierLopezT ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021
potiuk commented on issue #16456: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866250330 Kind ping again. Last chance to do some testing before we release. @JavierLopezT @mmenarguezpear @Junnplus @codenamestif @gabrielsyapse @uranusjr @Dr-Denzy @jpyen @jacobhjkim @zachliu @thejens @p-kachalov @sunki-hong @sjvanrossum @subkanthi @avocadomaster @jlaneve @sunkickr @malthe @yesemsanthoshkumar @Visya @andrewgodwin @dimberman @msumit @grassten @pgillet @dstandish @sfc-gh-madkins @ngaranko @ashb @tegardp -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021
potiuk commented on issue #16456: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864764509 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021
potiuk commented on issue #16456: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865252500 > Tested elasticsearch 2.0.1rc1 (note: rc1, not 2 as linked in the description), looks good. Do note that some of the fixes/features only work with core changes coming in 2.1.1, but the new provider does still work with earlier 2.x versions. Thanks @jedcunningham ! corrected the link to keep good track of it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021
potiuk commented on issue #16456: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865201487 > However, #15728 and #15667 touched the same file around the same time (also for minor changes) and aren't listed here, should they be included? Auto-apply is specifically excluded as it was a change that applied to all providers (and main reason for this backwards-incompatible release) but it has been tested before. The other one is a docstring only (and those are excluded from changelog/testing). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021
potiuk commented on issue #16456: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864764509 Hey everyone. Just a kind ping here. Due to update in READMEs, the voting on the packages have been prolonged to Tuesday so we have two more days for testing. Thanks to @dejii @TAKEDA-Takashi @flolas @levyitay @codenamestif @amatellanes @nlecoy @jmelot @Goodkat @zhzhang for testing their changes (you rock!). It would be great if we hear from others as well before the PMC gets to vote :). @MatthewRBruce @JavierLopezT @mmenarguezpear @monti-python @Junnplus @codenamestif @gabrielsyapse @uranusjr @Dr-Denzy @jpyen @jacobhjkim @olivermeyer @zachliu @thejens @p-kachalov @sunki-hong @sjvanrossum @subkanthi @avocadomaster @jlaneve @sunkickr @malthe @yesemsanthoshkumar @natanweinberger @jedcunningham @Visya @andrewgodwin @dimberman @msumit @grassten @pgillet @tianjianjiang @dstandish @Isaacwhyuenac @sfc-gh-madkins @ngaranko @ashb @tegardp -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
