[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #21348: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 05, 2022

2022-02-07 Thread GitBox


potiuk commented on issue #21348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21348#issuecomment-1031840031


   As discussed above ^^ I will cancel the whole vote/release and will make an 
RC2 as soon as we release the conditonally working SQL renderer. Thanks 
@josh-fell for spotting this and raising it! 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #21348: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 05, 2022

2022-02-07 Thread GitBox


potiuk commented on issue #21348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21348#issuecomment-1031838519


   Yeah. It's easy enough to fix and I agree it's better.
   
   I think - due to the the number of those affected, it makes more sense to 
cancel the whole release and re-release all providers as RC2 with that fix to 
not mess with two releases. there are no super-urgent changes in this wave.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #21348: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 05, 2022

2022-02-07 Thread GitBox


potiuk commented on issue #21348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21348#issuecomment-1031832322


   The second option is to indeed drop all the "21237" providers an release 
them in RC2 with some "conditional" code that will check if the lexer is there. 
After thinking a bit I think that would be much "cleaner" solution and I am 
leaning towards this option.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #21348: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 05, 2022

2022-02-07 Thread GitBox


potiuk commented on issue #21348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21348#issuecomment-1031828515


   Good point Josh. I think this one might be a bit tricky, I do not think it 
is "blocker" - the rendering is not nice but it does not "break" anything. 
   
   However I thought it might be a nice way to incentivize people to migrate to 
2.2.4 if we also cherry-pick the lexer to 2.2.4. Then we could telll them 
"migrate to 2.2.4 to get it nicer".  This is a new feature - of course - so 
technically we shoud add it in 2.3.0. So I am a bit torn here. 
   
   There are quite a number of those providers that are only released because 
of this renderer so we can easily skip them from this release and release them 
when we release 2.3.0 
   
   @jedcunningham @josh-fell @WDYT? 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #21348: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 05, 2022

2022-02-07 Thread GitBox


potiuk commented on issue #21348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21348#issuecomment-1031199630


   > Hi @potiuk - It is my first time doing this testing: Are there any 
specific steps we follow?
   
   Good question. Depends on your "local" environment. But what I would do, is 
to use:
   
   1. Start airflow 2.2.3 in breeze
   ```
   ./breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.3 --backend postgres 
--db-reset  --load-default-connections 
   
   
   This will start our dockerized development environment with Airflow 2.2.3 
installed and open 4 terminals: triggerer, scheduler, webserver and "bash 
console". 
   
   2. update the package to Rc: 
   
   In the console:
   ```
   pip install apache-airflow-providers-google==6.4.0rc1 
   ```
   
   Then restarting scheduler/webserver (by Ctrl+C) followed by "up cursor" to 
go back and run previous command 
   
   3. Prepare a test dag using calendar api and run it
   
   For that you likely need to configure the "google_default_connection" to 
include your credentials. You can put your dags in "files/dags" folder of your 
Airlfow sources (the "files" folder is mounted to inside the docker) and they 
should be scanned/visible in webserver


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #21348: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 05, 2022

2022-02-06 Thread GitBox


potiuk commented on issue #21348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21348#issuecomment-1030797255


   I also removed some of the "no-need-to-test" changes :)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #21348: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 05, 2022

2022-02-06 Thread GitBox


potiuk commented on issue #21348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21348#issuecomment-1030793431


   Ok. Still worth testing Amazon changes on this version but I will remove 
Amazon + Docker and prepare RC2 right after we release all others and get fixes 
merged. Thanks @Ritika-Singhal @raphaelauv ! 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org