[Apache Bloodhound] New user registration: JoKoT3

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
New user registration for user JoKoT3

--
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker



[Apache Bloodhound] #787: [patch] mysql support in bloodhound_setup.py

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
#787: [patch] mysql support in bloodhound_setup.py
-+
 Reporter:  JoKoT3   |  Owner:  nobody
 Type:  enhancement  | Status:  new
 Priority:  major|  Milestone:
Component:  installer|Version:  0.7.0
 Keywords:  mysql|
-+
 Hi,

 Here is a patch to bloodhound_setup.py to support an installation on
 mysql.
 It has been tested with the following installation type :
 - all needed parameters given
 - no parameters given, interactive installation
 - by providing the connectstring

 This is a follow-up to this conversation http://mail-
 archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bloodhound-user/201403.mbox/browser

-- 
Ticket URL: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/787
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker


Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #778: Ticket cannot be found if reporter is not an active user

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
#778: Ticket cannot be found if reporter is not an active user
+---
  Reporter:  hb |  Owner:  hb
  Type:  defect | Status:  needinfo(new)
  Priority:  major  |  Milestone:
 Component:  dashboard  |Version:  0.7.0
Resolution: |   Keywords:
+---

Comment (by rjollos):

 Replying to [comment:2 hb]:
  I have confirmed that renaming the reporter of an existing ticket to a
 non existing user does NOT make the ticket disappear from the list. (even
 after restarting apache)

 Sorry, but I'm not following the scenario. You are searching for a
 username, that is contained in the reporter field of a ticket, and you
 want to confirm that removing the user from the //Permissions table// does
 not effect whether the ticket appears in the search results?

 Certain ticket fields have the searchable property, so searching for a
 username should not depend on whether the user appears in the
 //Permissions// or //Session// table. The caching issues might lead to
 some misleading behavior when changing tickets though.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/778#comment:4
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker


Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #787: [patch] mysql support in bloodhound_setup.py

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
#787: [patch] mysql support in bloodhound_setup.py
--+--
  Reporter:  JoKoT3   |  Owner:  rjollos
  Type:  enhancement  | Status:  accepted
  Priority:  major|  Milestone:  next 0.x
 Component:  installer|Version:  0.7.0
Resolution:   |   Keywords:  mysql
--+--
Changes (by rjollos):

 * owner:  nobody = rjollos
 * status:  new = accepted
 * milestone:   = next 0.x


Comment:

 Thanks for the patch. We might be able to get it into the upcoming
 release. If not, then Release 9.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/787#comment:1
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker


[Apache Bloodhound] New user registration: guerilla

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
New user registration for user guerilla

--
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker



Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #237: Generic conversions still applied with different theme

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
#237: Generic conversions still applied with different theme
+---
  Reporter:  olemis |  Owner:  olemis
  Type:  defect | Status:  assigned
  Priority:  major  |  Milestone:  next 0.x
 Component:  dashboard  |Version:
Resolution: |   Keywords:  bootstrap
+---
Changes (by olemis):

 * status:  new = assigned
 * owner:  nobody = olemis


-- 
Ticket URL: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/237#comment:4
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker


Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #338: Add boolean fields for widgets

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
#338: Add boolean fields for widgets
--+--
  Reporter:  olemis   |  Owner:  olemis
  Type:  enhancement  | Status:  assigned
  Priority:  minor|  Milestone:  Unscheduled
 Component:  dashboard|Version:  0.3.0
Resolution:   |   Keywords:  widget fields parameters
--+--
Changes (by olemis):

 * owner:  gjm = olemis
 * status:  review = assigned


-- 
Ticket URL: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/338#comment:16
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker


Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #338: Add boolean fields for widgets

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
#338: Add boolean fields for widgets
--+--
  Reporter:  olemis   |  Owner:  olemis
  Type:  enhancement  | Status:  accepted
  Priority:  minor|  Milestone:  Unscheduled
 Component:  dashboard|Version:  0.3.0
Resolution:   |   Keywords:  widget fields parameters
--+--
Changes (by olemis):

 * status:  assigned = accepted


-- 
Ticket URL: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/338#comment:17
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker


svn commit: r1574778 - /bloodhound/trunk/bloodhound_relations/bhrelations/validation.py

2014-03-05 Thread rjollos
Author: rjollos
Date: Thu Mar  6 06:03:15 2014
New Revision: 1574778

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1574778
Log:
0.8dev: Moved `ValidationError` to the top of the module, per the convention in 
Trac.

Modified:
bloodhound/trunk/bloodhound_relations/bhrelations/validation.py

Modified: bloodhound/trunk/bloodhound_relations/bhrelations/validation.py
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/bloodhound/trunk/bloodhound_relations/bhrelations/validation.py?rev=1574778r1=1574777r2=1574778view=diff
==
--- bloodhound/trunk/bloodhound_relations/bhrelations/validation.py (original)
+++ bloodhound/trunk/bloodhound_relations/bhrelations/validation.py Thu Mar  6 
06:03:15 2014
@@ -26,6 +26,14 @@ from bhrelations.api import IRelationVal
 ResourceIdSerializer, TicketRelationsSpecifics
 
 
+class ValidationError(TracError):
+Exception raised when a validator fails.
+def __init__(self, message, title=None, show_traceback=False):
+super(ValidationError, self).__init__(
+message, title, show_traceback)
+self.failed_ids = []
+
+
 class Validator(Component):
 implements(IRelationValidator)
 
@@ -231,10 +239,3 @@ class BlockerValidator(Validator):
 error = ValidationError(error)
 error.failed_ids = path
 raise error
-
-
-class ValidationError(TracError):
-def __init__(self, message, title=None, show_traceback=False):
-super(ValidationError, self).__init__(
-message, title, show_traceback)
-self.failed_ids = []




Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #775: Can't create multiple is a parent of relations

2014-03-05 Thread Apache Bloodhound
#775: Can't create multiple is a parent of relations
+
  Reporter:  rjollos|  Owner:  rjollos
  Type:  defect | Status:  accepted
  Priority:  major  |  Milestone:  Release 8
 Component:  relations  |Version:
Resolution: |   Keywords:  validation
+
Description changed by rjollos:

Old description:

 To reproduce:
  * Create tickets A, B, C
  * Create a relation: ticket A //is a parent of// B
  * Create a relation: ticket A //is a parent of// C

 The following error results:
 {{{#!html
 div class=alert alert-errorspan class=label label-importantOops
 !/span
 Could not create relation.
 Resource emprod5:ticket:3/em can only have one bis a
 parent of/b relation./div
 }}}

 It appears that the `OneToManyValidator` needs to be more specific with
 regard to types of relations that it asserting on.

New description:

 To reproduce:
  * Create tickets A, B, C
  * Create a relation: ticket A //is a parent of// B
  * Create a relation: ticket A //is a parent of// C

 The following error results:
 {{{#!html
 div class=alert alert-errorspan class=label label-importantOops
 !/span
 Could not create relation.
 Resource emprod5:ticket:3/em can only have one bis a
 parent of/b relation./div
 }}}

 It appears that the `OneToManyValidator` needs to be more specific with
 regard to type of relation that it is asserting on.
 Proposals/BEP-0006#Constraints describes the requirement for the
 OneToManyValidator: //Parent/child relationships should be one-way (i.e.
 tree hierarchy, not a graph with backward relationships).// I interpret
 this even more simply as, //a ticket cannot have multiple parents.//

 For reference, the `OneToManyValidator` was implemented in [1483676] for
 #528.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/775#comment:2
Apache Bloodhound https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker