[GitHub] [hudi] alexeykudinkin commented on pull request #7582: [HUDI-5488] Make sure Disrupt queue start first, then insert records
alexeykudinkin commented on PR #7582: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/7582#issuecomment-1396402031 Landing this since there's no material changes since last revision, and CI passed previously -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@hudi.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [hudi] alexeykudinkin commented on pull request #7582: [HUDI-5488]Make sure Disrupt queue start first, then insert records
alexeykudinkin commented on PR #7582: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/7582#issuecomment-1377612744 @boneanxs @zhangyue19921010 We should do what @zhangyue19921010 suggested in his review 1. Introduce empty `setup` method in the base class 2. Move current contents of the `doConsume` for Disruptor into `setup` 3. Keep `doConsume` for Disruptor empty -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@hudi.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org