[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prashant Wason updated HUDI-3407: - Fix Version/s: 0.14.1 (was: 0.14.0) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.14.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yue Zhang updated HUDI-3407: Fix Version/s: 0.14.0 (was: 0.13.1) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.14.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Danny Chen updated HUDI-3407: - Sprint: (was: ) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Kudinkin updated HUDI-3407: -- Sprint: 2023-01-09 > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Kudinkin updated HUDI-3407: -- Sprint: (was: 0.13.0 Final Sprint) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Kudinkin updated HUDI-3407: -- Priority: Major (was: Blocker) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Epic Link: HUDI-5425 (was: HUDI-1456) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Epic Link: HUDI-1456 > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Priority: Blocker (was: Critical) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sagar Sumit updated HUDI-3407: -- Sprint: 2022/12/26 > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zhaojing Yu updated HUDI-3407: -- Fix Version/s: 0.13.0 (was: 0.12.1) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Sprint: (was: 2022/09/19) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sivabalan narayanan updated HUDI-3407: -- Sprint: 2022/09/19 (was: 2022/09/05) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Sprint: 2022/09/05 (was: 2022/08/22) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Priority: Critical (was: Major) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Component/s: multi-writer > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: multi-writer >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sagar Sumit updated HUDI-3407: -- Sprint: 2022/08/22 > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sagar Sumit updated HUDI-3407: -- Fix Version/s: 0.12.1 (was: 0.12.0) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Xu updated HUDI-3407: - Fix Version/s: 0.12.0 (was: 0.11.0) > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.12.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-3407) Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer scenario
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sivabalan narayanan updated HUDI-3407: -- Fix Version/s: 0.11.0 > Make sure Restore operation is Not Concurrent w/ Writes in Multi-Writer > scenario > > > Key: HUDI-3407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3407 > Project: Apache Hudi > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Alexey Kudinkin >Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.11.0 > > > Currently there's no guard-rail that would prevent Restore from running > concurrently with Writes in Multi-Writer scenario, which might lead to table > getting into inconsistent state. > > One of the approaches could be letting Restore to acquire the Write lock for > the whole duration of its operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
