[jira] [Updated] (SIS-86) Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Desruisseaux updated SIS-86:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1)
1.2
> Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
> --
>
> Key: SIS-86
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86
> Project: Spatial Information Systems
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utilities
>Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux
>Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.2
>
>
> The {{@Configuration}} annotation is currently for identifying various static
> method having a system-wide effect. We may consider regrouping all such
> methods in a central place, maybe in a new {{org.apache.sis.setup}} package.
> We could provide pre-defined configuration profiles, including:
> * {{STRICT}} - maximal level of strictness (duplicated values cause parsing
> errors, Bursa-Wolf parameters mandatory for datum shifts, _etc._).
> * {{DEFAULT}} - the default setting as a compromise between {{STRICT}} and
> {{LENIENT}}: duplicated values just produce warnings, but datum shifts still
> require Bursa-Wolf parameters.
> * {{LENIENT}} - still working even if the accuracy may be compromise (e.g.
> apply datum shifts even in the absence of Bursa-Wolf parameters).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (SIS-86) Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Desruisseaux updated SIS-86:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1
> Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
> --
>
> Key: SIS-86
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86
> Project: Spatial Information Systems
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utilities
>Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux
>Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> The {{@Configuration}} annotation is currently for identifying various static
> method having a system-wide effect. We may consider regrouping all such
> methods in a central place, maybe in a new {{org.apache.sis.setup}} package.
> We could provide pre-defined configuration profiles, including:
> * {{STRICT}} - maximal level of strictness (duplicated values cause parsing
> errors, Bursa-Wolf parameters mandatory for datum shifts, _etc._).
> * {{DEFAULT}} - the default setting as a compromise between {{STRICT}} and
> {{LENIENT}}: duplicated values just produce warnings, but datum shifts still
> require Bursa-Wolf parameters.
> * {{LENIENT}} - still working even if the accuracy may be compromise (e.g.
> apply datum shifts even in the absence of Bursa-Wolf parameters).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Updated] (SIS-86) Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Desruisseaux updated SIS-86:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.6)
> Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
> --
>
> Key: SIS-86
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86
> Project: Spatial Information Systems
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utilities
>Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux
>Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux
>
> The {{@Configuration}} annotation is currently for identifying various static
> method having a system-wide effect. We may consider regrouping all such
> methods in a central place, maybe in a new {{org.apache.sis.setup}} package.
> We could provide pre-defined configuration profiles, including:
> * {{STRICT}} - maximal level of strictness (duplicated values cause parsing
> errors, Bursa-Wolf parameters mandatory for datum shifts, _etc._).
> * {{DEFAULT}} - the default setting as a compromise between {{STRICT}} and
> {{LENIENT}}: duplicated values just produce warnings, but datum shifts still
> require Bursa-Wolf parameters.
> * {{LENIENT}} - still working even if the accuracy may be compromise (e.g.
> apply datum shifts even in the absence of Bursa-Wolf parameters).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (SIS-86) Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Desruisseaux updated SIS-86:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.5)
0.6
> Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
> --
>
> Key: SIS-86
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86
> Project: Spatial Information Systems
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utilities
>Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux
>Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux
> Fix For: 0.6
>
>
> The {{@Configuration}} annotation is currently for identifying various static
> method having a system-wide effect. We may consider regrouping all such
> methods in a central place, maybe in a new {{org.apache.sis.setup}} package.
> We could provide pre-defined configuration profiles, including:
> * {{STRICT}} - maximal level of strictness (duplicated values cause parsing
> errors, Bursa-Wolf parameters mandatory for datum shifts, _etc._).
> * {{DEFAULT}} - the default setting as a compromise between {{STRICT}} and
> {{LENIENT}}: duplicated values just produce warnings, but datum shifts still
> require Bursa-Wolf parameters.
> * {{LENIENT}} - still working even if the accuracy may be compromise (e.g.
> apply datum shifts even in the absence of Bursa-Wolf parameters).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (SIS-86) Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Desruisseaux updated SIS-86:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.4)
0.5
> Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
> --
>
> Key: SIS-86
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86
> Project: Spatial Information Systems
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utilities
>Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux
>Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux
> Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> The {{@Configuration}} annotation is currently for identifying various static
> method having a system-wide effect. We may consider regrouping all such
> methods in a central place, maybe in a new {{org.apache.sis.setup}} package.
> We could provide pre-defined configuration profiles, including:
> * {{STRICT}} - maximal level of strictness (duplicated values cause parsing
> errors, Bursa-Wolf parameters mandatory for datum shifts, _etc._).
> * {{DEFAULT}} - the default setting as a compromise between {{STRICT}} and
> {{LENIENT}}: duplicated values just produce warnings, but datum shifts still
> require Bursa-Wolf parameters.
> * {{LENIENT}} - still working even if the accuracy may be compromise (e.g.
> apply datum shifts even in the absence of Bursa-Wolf parameters).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Updated] (SIS-86) Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris A. Mattmann updated SIS-86:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.3)
0.4
> Refactor @Configuration annotation into a real Configuration class
> --
>
> Key: SIS-86
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-86
> Project: Spatial Information Systems
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utilities
>Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux
>Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux
> Fix For: 0.4
>
>
> The {{@Configuration}} annotation is currently for identifying various static
> method having a system-wide effect. We may consider regrouping all such
> methods in a central place, maybe in a new {{org.apache.sis.setup}} package.
> We could provide pre-defined configuration profiles, including:
> * {{STRICT}} - maximal level of strictness (duplicated values cause parsing
> errors, Bursa-Wolf parameters mandatory for datum shifts, _etc._).
> * {{DEFAULT}} - the default setting as a compromise between {{STRICT}} and
> {{LENIENT}}: duplicated values just produce warnings, but datum shifts still
> require Bursa-Wolf parameters.
> * {{LENIENT}} - still working even if the accuracy may be compromise (e.g.
> apply datum shifts even in the absence of Bursa-Wolf parameters).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
