svn propchange: r1913099 - svn:log

2023-10-18 Thread futatuki
Author: futatuki
Revision: 1913099
Modified property: svn:log

Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 19 04:23:27 2023
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Oct 19 04:23:27 2023
@@ -1 +1,4 @@
 * 1.14.x/STATUS: Fix the order of revisions in r1912500 group. 
+
+[Note from the future: Actually the set of revisions in this group was
+ also including typo. This was fixed in r1913100. ]



svn propchange: r1912520 - svn:log

2023-10-18 Thread futatuki
Author: futatuki
Revision: 1912520
Modified property: svn:log

Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 19 04:20:36 2023
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Oct 19 04:20:36 2023
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 * 1.14.x/STATUS: Nominate r1912500, r192501, r192502, r192503, r1912515,
 and r1912517
 
-[Note from the future: The set of revisions to be nominated is correct,
- but its order was incorrect. This was fixed in r1913099. ]
+[Note from the future: The set of revisions to be nominated is incorrect
+ This was fixed in r1913100. ]



svn commit: r1913100 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

2023-10-18 Thread futatuki
Author: futatuki
Date: Thu Oct 19 04:17:37 2023
New Revision: 1913100

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913100=rev
Log:
* 1.14.x/STATUS: Fix typo in the revisions in r192500 group.

In r1913099, I belived I only mistaked the order of revisions in this
nomination group, but actually also mistaked the revisions itself.

Modified:
subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1913100=1913099=1913100=diff
==
--- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Oct 19 04:17:37 2023
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Candidate changes:
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =
 
- * r1912500, r192501, r192502, r192503, r1912515, r1912517, r1912691
+ * r1912500, r1912501, r1912502, r1912503, r1912515, r1912517, r1912691
swig-py: Use pure Python objects as edit/parse_fns3 and decendant batons. 
Justification:
  Bug fix. Issue #4916, #4917, #4918




svn propchange: r1912520 - svn:log

2023-10-18 Thread futatuki
Author: futatuki
Revision: 1912520
Modified property: svn:log

Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 19 04:00:25 2023
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Oct 19 04:00:25 2023
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
 * 1.14.x/STATUS: Nominate r1912500, r192501, r192502, r192503, r1912515,
 and r1912517
+
+[Note from the future: The set of revisions to be nominated is correct,
+ but its order was incorrect. This was fixed in r1913099. ]



svn commit: r1913099 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

2023-10-18 Thread futatuki
Author: futatuki
Date: Thu Oct 19 03:53:53 2023
New Revision: 1913099

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913099=rev
Log:
* 1.14.x/STATUS: Fix the order of revisions in r1912500 group. 

Modified:
subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1913099=1913098=1913099=diff
==
--- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Oct 19 03:53:53 2023
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Candidate changes:
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =
 
- * r192501, r192502, r192503, r1912500, r1912515, r1912517, r1912691
+ * r1912500, r192501, r192502, r192503, r1912515, r1912517, r1912691
swig-py: Use pure Python objects as edit/parse_fns3 and decendant batons. 
Justification:
  Bug fix. Issue #4916, #4917, #4918




Re: svn commit: r1913094 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

2023-10-18 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Hi,

I might have been a bit harsh here to Veto this merge, after actually
providing a positive note. But I investigated why the merge didn't go
through and I realised there is a digit missing in the nomination for the
first three revisions. I'm fairly sure it should be r1912501, r1912502,
r1912503  instead (missing the third digit).

I'd like someone (Yasuhito?) to crosscheck, if you agree feel free to
modify my vote back to the old +0 with comment and move to approved.

Kind regards,
Daniel

Den tors 19 okt. 2023 kl 02:02 skrev :

> Author: dsahlberg
> Date: Thu Oct 19 00:02:48 2023
> New Revision: 1913094
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913094=rev
> Log:
> In branches/1.14.x:
>
> * STATUS
>   Remove my nomination for the swig-py fixes. Explained on dev@
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1913094=1913093=1913094=diff
>
> ==
> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Oct 19 00:02:48 2023
> @@ -39,13 +39,14 @@ Candidate changes:
>  Veto-blocked changes:
>  =
>
> -Approved changes:
> -=
> -
>   * r192501, r192502, r192503, r1912500, r1912515, r1912517, r1912691
> swig-py: Use pure Python objects as edit/parse_fns3 and decendant
> batons.
> Justification:
>   Bug fix. Issue #4916, #4917, #4918
> Votes:
>   +1: futatuki
> - +0: dsahlberg (not enough experience for +1, but looks good)
> + -1: dsahlberg Nominated revision numbers doesn't make sense, see dev@
> +
> +Approved changes:
> +=
> +
>
>
>


svn commit: r1913094 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

2023-10-18 Thread dsahlberg
Author: dsahlberg
Date: Thu Oct 19 00:02:48 2023
New Revision: 1913094

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913094=rev
Log:
In branches/1.14.x:

* STATUS
  Remove my nomination for the swig-py fixes. Explained on dev@

Modified:
subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1913094=1913093=1913094=diff
==
--- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Oct 19 00:02:48 2023
@@ -39,13 +39,14 @@ Candidate changes:
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =
 
-Approved changes:
-=
-
  * r192501, r192502, r192503, r1912500, r1912515, r1912517, r1912691
swig-py: Use pure Python objects as edit/parse_fns3 and decendant batons. 
Justification:
  Bug fix. Issue #4916, #4917, #4918
Votes:
  +1: futatuki
- +0: dsahlberg (not enough experience for +1, but looks good)
+ -1: dsahlberg Nominated revision numbers doesn't make sense, see dev@
+
+Approved changes:
+=
+