Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

[Daniel Shahaf]

Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:01:26 +0200:
> Den mån 28 mars 2022 kl 02:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf :
> > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> > > I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> > > probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and eted
> > > sections doesn't look nice.
> >
> > All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
> > a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
> > it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
> >
> 
> #todo is used in several other places. I don't know if we have specific CSS
> for .
> 
> This was a little bit of a flame bait to see if anyone else has an opinion
> on the eted table.

I was referring to .divider, .task-level-1, and .in-progress, which were
used to create a table with headers within the table.  They are still
defined in our CSS, but now there's no example of their use.  Sorry for
the unclarity.

Cheers,

Daniel

Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

[Daniel Sahlberg]

Den mån 28 mars 2022 kl 02:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf :

> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <
> d...@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> >
> >> Thanks for these two changes!  The information is duplicated in
> >> ;
> >> anyone wants to fix that, too?  (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
> >>
> >
> > Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be
> merged
> > right away. Thanks for pointing out!
> >
>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> I wonder whether we should add "1.15.x | Not yet supported" to that table.
>

-0:  1.15 doesn't even exist yet and /trunk is never "supported". I think
we can add it when we branch.

> I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> > probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and eted
> > sections doesn't look nice.
>
> All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
> a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
> it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
>

#todo is used in several other places. I don't know if we have specific CSS
for .

This was a little bit of a flame bait to see if anyone else has an opinion
on the eted table.

Kind regards,
Daniel

Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

[Daniel Shahaf]

Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf :
>
>> Thanks for these two changes!  The information is duplicated in
>> ;
>> anyone wants to fix that, too?  (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
>>
>
> Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be merged
> right away. Thanks for pointing out!
>

Thanks for fixing it.

I wonder whether we should add "1.15.x | Not yet supported" to that table.

> I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and eted
> sections doesn't look nice.

All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)

Cheers,

Daniel

Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

[Daniel Sahlberg]

Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf :

> Thanks for these two changes!  The information is duplicated in
> ;
> anyone wants to fix that, too?  (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
>

Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be merged
right away. Thanks for pointing out!

I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and eted
sections doesn't look nice.

/Daniel

Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

[Daniel Shahaf]

Thanks for these two changes!  The information is duplicated in
;
anyone wants to fix that, too?  (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)

dsahlb...@apache.org wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:14 +00:00:
> Author: dsahlberg
> Date: Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
> New Revision: 1899247
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899247=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: 1.13.x is end of life (2019-10-30 + 6 months < $TODAY)
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS?rev=1899247=1899246=1899247=diff
> ==
> --- subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>* *
> -  *  THIS RELEASE STREAM IS OPEN FOR STABILIZATION. *
> +  *  THIS RELEASE STREAM IS CLOSED: SUPERSEDED BY 1.14. *
>* *
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

[dsahlberg]

Author: dsahlberg
Date: Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
New Revision: 1899247

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899247=rev
Log:
* STATUS: 1.13.x is end of life (2019-10-30 + 6 months < $TODAY)

Modified:
subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS?rev=1899247=1899246=1899247=diff
==
--- subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
   * *
-  *  THIS RELEASE STREAM IS OPEN FOR STABILIZATION. *
+  *  THIS RELEASE STREAM IS CLOSED: SUPERSEDED BY 1.14. *
   * *
   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *