[jira] Created: (HADOOP-6191) Allow Super user access only from certian trusted IP Range- This is to avoid spoofing by others as super user and gain access to the cluster
Allow Super user access only from certian trusted IP Range- This is to avoid spoofing by others as super user and gain access to the cluster Key: HADOOP-6191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6191 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 0.18.2 Reporter: Pallavi Palleti Priority: Minor This is similar to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6187 but for 18.2 version -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6190) Links to Hadoop mailing list mbox files are broken
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting resolved HADOOP-6190. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Doug Cutting Good idea. I created that link. Thanks for noticing this, Tom. Links to Hadoop mailing list mbox files are broken -- Key: HADOOP-6190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6190 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Tom White Assignee: Doug Cutting Fix For: site http://hadoop.apache.org/mail/ returns a 404 (compare, for example, http://lucene.apache.org/mail/). There should be a symbolic link in /www/hadoop.apache.org/ from mail to /home/apmail/public-arch/hadoop.apache.org on people.apache.org. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Contributing a New FileSystem Implementation - Questions About Process
Thanks for the pointers Tom and Cos, this is helpful. We'll take a look at these as we firm up our test plan. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Tom White t...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi Jonathan, For testing you can subclass FileSystemContractBaseTest and create an instance of the filesystem to test in the set up method, to check that the new implementation conforms to the contract of the FileSystem interface (although see also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-303). See TestHDFSFileSystemContract for an example. Cheers, Tom On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Konstantin Boudnikc...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Jonathan, in case you need to take a look at a common testplan template you can find one in HDFS-265 or more generic in HADOOP-5587 Cos On 8/11/09 8:32 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: Jonathan Seidman wrote: Thanks for the replies. We'll create a patch for trunk and then include a 0.18 compatible patch with the Jira, as you suggest. Based on other contributed FileSystem implementations, we were assuming this should go in o.a.h.fs and not contrib, so thanks for the clarification. what's the test plan going to be for a new FS? -- Jonathan Seidman Open Data Group
Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21
+1 Thanks Hemanth Owen O'Malley wrote: All, After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of 4:30 pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce. -- Owen
