[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12473) distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option

2015-12-21 Thread Mithun Radhakrishnan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15067214#comment-15067214
 ] 

Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HADOOP-12473:
---

[~jira.shegalov], [~liuml07], could you please explain the reasoning behind 
this fix?

If I understand correctly, Gera's orthogonal suggestion in HADOOP-12469 was to 
make {{-atomic}} and {{-i}} mutually exclusive. The latest patch in this JIRA 
doesn't seem to address this concern, AFAICT. It makes {{ignoreFailures}} an 
{{AtomicBoolean}}, which is not what Gera was getting at, I believe.

Also, [~jira.shegalov], why do you recommend that {{-atomic}} and {{-i}} be 
mutually exclusive? Aren't they orthogonal concerns? Why consider {{-atomic}} 
as incapable of ignoring copy-errors?



> distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12473
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: tools/distcp
>Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>Reporter: Mingliang Liu
>Assignee: Mingliang Liu
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12473.000.patch, HADOOP-12473.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-12473.002.patch
>
>
> In {{CopyMapper::handleFailure}}, the mapper handles failure and will ignore 
> it if no it's config key is on. Ignoring failures should be mutually 
> exclusive with the atomic option otherwise an incomplete dir is eligible for 
> commit defeating the purpose.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12473) distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option

2015-11-03 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14986966#comment-14986966
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12473:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 5s 
{color} | {color:blue} docker + precommit patch detected. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m 
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
34s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 16s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
20s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
9s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
43s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 49s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-distcp in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 8s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-distcp in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
25s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 24m 0s {color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.7.1 Server=1.7.1 
Image:test-patch-base-hadoop-date2015-11-03 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12770269/HADOOP-12473.002.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-12473 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  unit  findbugs  
checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux e780ee62a63b 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/patchprocess/apache-yetus-1a9afee/precommit/personality/hadoop.sh
 |
| git revision | trunk / 957f031 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_79 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_60 
/

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12473) distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option

2015-11-02 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14986325#comment-14986325
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12473:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:blue} docker + precommit patch detected. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 1m 52s 
{color} | {color:red} root in trunk failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
12s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
23s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
38s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:red} hadoop-distcp in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
11s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
44s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 8m 27s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-distcp in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 57s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-distcp in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
29s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 24m 51s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.7.1 Server=1.7.1 
Image:test-patch-base-hadoop-date2015-11-02 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12770179/HADOOP-12473.001.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-12473 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  unit  findbugs  
checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux b8ee3fc70cc2 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/patchprocess/apache-yetus-1a9afee/precommit/personality/hadoop.sh
 |
| git revision | trunk / 78d6890 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_79 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-ora

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12473) distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option

2015-10-31 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14984208#comment-14984208
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12473:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 4s 
{color} | {color:blue} docker + precommit patch detected. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m 
49s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
9s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
25s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
28s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
19s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
8s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
12s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
40s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 11s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 24s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-distcp in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 6m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-distcp in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
21s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 21m 59s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.7.1 Server=1.7.1 
Image:test-patch-base-hadoop-date2015-10-31 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12769965/HADOOP-12473.000.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-12473 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  unit  findbugs  
checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 2496d22548c4 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/patchprocess/apache-yetus-e77b1ce/precommit/personality/hadoop.sh
 |
| git revision | trunk / 7fd6416 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_79 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_60 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12473) distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option

2015-10-30 Thread Mingliang Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14983007#comment-14983007
 ] 

Mingliang Liu commented on HADOOP-12473:


Thanks to your comment [~Prabhu Joseph]. I think the {{ignoreFailures}} is to 
make the copy mapper ignore only {{RetriableFileCopyCommand.CopyReadException}} 
failures? Sorry I don't have the context about MRv1.

> distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12473
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: tools/distcp
>Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>Reporter: Mingliang Liu
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> In {{CopyMapper::handleFailure}}, the mapper handles failure and will ignore 
> it if no it's config key is on. Ignoring failures should be mutually 
> exclusive with the atomic option otherwise an incomplete dir is eligible for 
> commit defeating the purpose.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12473) distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option

2015-10-30 Thread Prabhu Joseph (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14982052#comment-14982052
 ] 

Prabhu Joseph commented on HADOOP-12473:


[~liuml07] Hi,  I am having a doubt on the below code of 
org.apache.hadoop.tools.mapred.CopyMapper

  if (ignoreFailures && exception.getCause() instanceof
 RetriableFileCopyCommand.CopyReadException

Why we are using &&, if i use hadoop distcp -i , it has ignore any Exception 
right. In MRV1 distcp org/apache/hadoop/tools/DistCp$CopyFilesMapper, it was || 
and it ignores any Exception. But in MRV2, it doesn't.

   if (0 == failcount || ignoreReadFailures) 







> distcp's ignoring failures should be mutually exclusive with the atomic option
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12473
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12473
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: tools/distcp
>Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>Reporter: Mingliang Liu
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> In {{CopyMapper::handleFailure}}, the mapper handles failure and will ignore 
> it if no it's config key is on. Ignoring failures should be mutually 
> exclusive with the atomic option otherwise an incomplete dir is eligible for 
> commit defeating the purpose.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)