[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-12 Thread Virajith Jalaparti (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17105964#comment-17105964
 ] 

Virajith Jalaparti commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Committed  [^HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch]  and  
[^HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch] to branches 3.1 and 2.10 resp.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch, HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-12 Thread Virajith Jalaparti (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17105852#comment-17105852
 ] 

Virajith Jalaparti commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Thanks for taking a look [~umamaheswararao]! Will commit these soon.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch, HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-12 Thread Uma Maheswara Rao G (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17105817#comment-17105817
 ] 

Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

[~virajith],  I have looked at them.

+1 LGTM.

 

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch, HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-12 Thread Virajith Jalaparti (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17105617#comment-17105617
 ] 

Virajith Jalaparti commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Looks like the issues in [the last jenkins run| 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?focusedCommentId=17105143=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17105143]
 are from 2.10 and not related to  [^HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch] 

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch, HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-12 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17105143#comment-17105143
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 17m  
9s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2.10 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 13m 
 2s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red}  0m 
44s{color} | {color:red} root in branch-2.10 failed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m 
36s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
40s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
15s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red}  0m 
22s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-common in branch-2.10 failed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
59s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue}  2m  
2s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching 
to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red}  2m  
0s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common in branch-2.10 has 
14 extant findbugs warnings. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 12m 
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 12m 58s{color} 
| {color:red} root-jdkOracleCorporation-1.7.0_95-b00 with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00 generated 1428 new + 7 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1435 
total (was 7) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m 
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 11m 
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
40s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: The patch 
generated 0 new + 330 unchanged - 3 fixed = 330 total (was 333) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red}  1m 
11s{color} | {color:red} 
hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common-jdkOracleCorporation-1.7.0_95-b00 with JDK 
Oracle Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00 generated 11 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 11 
total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  2m  
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m  
7s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-11 Thread Virajith Jalaparti (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17105080#comment-17105080
 ] 

Virajith Jalaparti commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Hi [~umamaheswararao] - do you mind checking 
[^HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch] and [^HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch]? 
Straight forward but had minor conflicts when I backported. 

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.2
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-2.10.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch, HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-11 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17104999#comment-17104999
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 19m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.1 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
21s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 23m 
13s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m 
13s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
42s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
37s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
19m 23s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
4s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
54s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering 
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
56s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.1 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
18s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 14m 
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 14m 16s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1301 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1316 total 
(was 1316) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
40s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 342 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 342 total (was 345) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}  
2m 10s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing our 
client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
6s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m 
21s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}109m 47s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
53s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}241m 13s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestNameNodeMXBean |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/16934/artifact/out/Dockerfile
 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13002656/HADOOP-15565-branch-3.1.001.patch
 |
| Optional 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-11 Thread Virajith Jalaparti (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17104861#comment-17104861
 ] 

Virajith Jalaparti commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Thanks [~umamaheswararao]. The test failures in the last jenkins run are not 
related here; the javac issues are warnings – changing these will not be a 
simple backport. Will commit [^HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch] soon. 

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-11 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17104850#comment-17104850
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 17m 
58s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
36s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 26m 
38s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 19m 
52s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  3m 
 3s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m  
4s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
21m 32s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
26s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue}  3m 
26s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering 
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m 
44s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  2m 
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 19m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 19m 21s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1350 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1365 total 
(was 1365) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
55s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 342 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 342 total (was 345) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 59s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
17s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  6m 
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m 
32s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}133m 19s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  1m 
32s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}296m 33s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDirectoryScanner |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockTokenWithDFS |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDecommission |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFSImage |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestFileCreation |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-11 Thread Uma Maheswara Rao G (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17104713#comment-17104713
 ] 

Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

+1 LGTM

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-11 Thread Virajith Jalaparti (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17104509#comment-17104509
 ] 

Virajith Jalaparti commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Good catch [~umamaheswararao]. I removed {{removeFileSystemForTesting}} in  
[^HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch] 

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-09 Thread Uma Maheswara Rao G (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103532#comment-17103532
 ] 

Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

[~virajith] I have looked at the patch. It seems clean backport to me. 
 I am almost +1, But I have a question:
 Looks like following change is not from this trunk patch.
 In FileSystem.java
{code:java}
197   @VisibleForTesting
198   static void removeFileSystemForTesting(URI uri, Configuration conf,
199   FileSystem fs) throws IOException {
200 CACHE.map.remove(new Cache.Key(uri, conf), fs);
201   }
{code}
I have looked history and figured out that, this change introduced as part of 
[^HADOOP-13656.008.patch]

Could you please check if we can avoid that change in this JIRA?
 Otherwise I am +1.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-09 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103492#comment-17103492
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
24s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
19s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 23m 
35s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 16m 
22s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
46s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
31s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
20m  1s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
6s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
54s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering 
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
51s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m 
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 15m 28s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1350 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1365 total 
(was 1365) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
45s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 343 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 343 total (was 346) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 41s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
4s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m  
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m 
30s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}101m 26s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
58s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}229m 55s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestDecommissioningStatus |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestReconstructStripedFileWithRandomECPolicy |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/16930/artifact/out/Dockerfile
 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-08 Thread Uma Maheswara Rao G (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103073#comment-17103073
 ] 

Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

[~virajith] Thanks for updating the patch. I will take a look at it. Thank you.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-08 Thread Virajith Jalaparti (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103025#comment-17103025
 ] 

Virajith Jalaparti commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Failed test {{TestRollingUpgrade}} seems to be a transient failure here (passes 
locally) - re-queuing jenkins. [~umamahesh]/[~cliang] - do you mind reviewing 
[^HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch]? Backporting this all the way to 2.10.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-08 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17102920#comment-17102920
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 15m 
51s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
35s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 23m 
53s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 16m 
23s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
45s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
33s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
19m 53s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
6s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
57s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering 
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
58s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m 
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 15m 27s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1350 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1365 total 
(was 1365) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
43s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 343 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 343 total (was 346) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 50s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m 
10s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m 
28s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}102m 25s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
59s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}245m 59s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestRollingUpgrade |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/16928/artifact/out/Dockerfile
 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13002430/HADOOP-15565-branch-3.2.001.patch
 |
| Optional Tests | dupname 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2020-05-07 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17102203#comment-17102203
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 17m 
47s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2.10 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  9m 
50s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red}  0m 
44s{color} | {color:red} root in branch-2.10 failed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m 
32s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
42s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
13s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
10s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
57s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.10 passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue}  2m  
1s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching 
to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red}  1m 
59s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common in branch-2.10 has 
14 extant findbugs warnings. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red}  0m 
56s{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red}  0m 56s{color} 
| {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 11m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
0m 39s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: The patch 
generated 6 new + 328 unchanged - 5 fixed = 334 total (was 333) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
14s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK Oracle 
Corporation-1.7.0_95-b00 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK Private 
Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~16.04-b09 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red}  2m  
8s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common generated 2 new + 
14 unchanged - 0 fixed = 16 total (was 14) {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m  
6s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
44s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 78m 44s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-06 Thread Hudson (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16924443#comment-16924443
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #17242 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/17242/])
HADOOP-15565. Add an inner FS cache to ViewFileSystem, separate from the 
(xkrogen: rev c92a3e94d80c86199e65735ee5aec4a6f02f50a3)
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFileSystem.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystemBaseTest.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ChRootedFileSystem.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystem.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFileUtil.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFsDefaultValue.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFileSystemDelegation.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileSystem.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/Constants.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFileSystemDelegationTokenSupport.java


> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-06 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16924441#comment-16924441
 ] 

Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

The v8 patch LGTM, thanks a lot [~LiJinglun]! I just committed this to trunk.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923948#comment-16923948
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
34s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m  
6s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 18m 
11s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m 
37s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
18s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
24s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
16m 58s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
42s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 14m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 14m 57s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1457 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1472 total 
(was 1472) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
19s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 346 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 346 total (was 349) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
11m 29s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m  
7s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 96m 
48s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}206m 49s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e53b4 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12979600/HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 181e3c92e83a 4.15.0-54-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24 
10:55:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / acbea8d |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_222 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| javac | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-05 Thread Jinglun (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923876#comment-16923876
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Hi [~xkrogen], I did a test about the diff 0 issue. When I wget v006 link the 
patch downloaded is actually v007. There must be a bug of Jira. I'll re-upload  
v006 as v006.bak.

Thanks for your advice, very helpful ! Upload patch-008 changing to 
Objects.equals.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.bak, HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0008.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-05 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923545#comment-16923545
 ] 

Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Thanks for the detailed explanations [~LiJinglun]! They are very helpful; it 
all makes sense now.

It looks like the v007 patch is identical to the v006 patch – did you upload 
the wrong file?
{code:java}
± diff HADOOP-15565.0006.patch HADOOP-15565.0006.patch | wc -l
   0
{code}
While I'm at it, there is one more thing I noticed: In 
{{TestChRootedFileSystem#getChildFileSystem()}}, can we use 
[{{Objects.equals}}|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/Objects.html#equals-java.lang.Object-java.lang.Object-]
 instead of manually doing a null + equality check? I think it should make this 
cleaner.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923532#comment-16923532
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
43s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  7m 
44s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m 
56s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 17m 
20s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
24s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
17m 14s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
1s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 14m 
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 14m 52s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1457 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1472 total 
(was 1472) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
22s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 345 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 345 total (was 348) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
11m 28s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m  
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m 
41s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 97m 16s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
48s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}217m 50s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.qjournal.server.TestJournalNodeSync |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.2 Server=19.03.2 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e53b4 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12979558/HADOOP-15565.0007.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 9c8c0fa73c46 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 
11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 172bcd8 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-05 Thread Jinglun (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923308#comment-16923308
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Hi [~xkrogen], thanks very much for your nice review !  I followed all the 
suggestions and upload patch- 007.
{quote}Can you explain why the changes in 
{{TestViewFileSystemDelegationTokenSupport}} are necessary? Same for 
{{TestViewFileSystemDelegation}} – it seems like the old way of returning the 
created {{fs}} was cleaner?
{quote}
Good question! I change the unit tests because: Before we add the cache, all 
the children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE. So the filesystem 
instance returned by setupMockFileSystem() is exactly the child filesystem of 
viewFs. After adding the ViewFileSystem.InnerCache, viewFs's children 
filesystem instances are no longer cached in FileSystem.CACHE, so we can't set 
fs1 and fs2 to the FileSystem instance returned by setupMockFileSystem().
{quote}I also don't understand the need for changes in {{testSanity()}} – does 
the string comparison no longer work?
{quote}
About testSanity(), after changing to 
{code:java}
fs1 = (FakeFileSystem) getChildFileSystem((ViewFileSystem) viewFs, new 
URI("fs1:/"));{code}
fs1.getUri() will have a path which is set by ViewFileSystem.InnerCache.get(URI 
uri, Configuratioin config). So comparing the URI.toString() doesn't work any 
more. And I change to compare the scheme and authority.
{quote}Can you describe why the changes in {{TestViewFsDefaultValue}} are 
necessary?
{quote}
Good question! I did the changes because: In 
TestViewFsDefaultValue.clusterSetupAtBegining(), there are 2 Configuration 
instances *CONF* and *conf*. For key _DFS_REPLICATION_KEY_, *CONF* is set to 
_DFS_REPLICATION_DEFAULT + 1_ while *conf* is the default value. Before we have 
the InnerCache, the child filesystem instance of vfs is got from 
FileSystem.CACHE which is constructed with *CONF*. After the InnerCache the 
child filesystem instance is got with *conf*. In the test case 
testGetDefaultReplication(), the default replication is got from the child 
FileSystem instance. When using *CONF* it will be _DFS_REPLICATION_DEFAULT + 1_ 
and when using *conf* it will be _DFS_REPLICATION_DEFAULT_. Because 
testGetDefaultReplication() tests the default replication of the mount point 
path, I set __ to *conf* to 
make it work_._

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch, HADOOP-15565.0007.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-09-04 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16922760#comment-16922760
 ] 

Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Hi [~LiJinglun], sorry for my delayed response, I just returned from vacation 
recently. Here is another review. Things look great overall, the comments are 
mostly minor.

* Can we make the log message in {{ViewFileSystem}} L119 more informative? If 
you were only to look at the logs and not the code, "close failed" would be 
confusing.
* Can you add some comments on {{ViewFileSystem}} L292 explaining why the cache 
can be immutable, on {{InnerCache}} explaining why this cache is necessary 
(maybe just a reference to this JIRA), and on {{InnerCache.Key}} describing why 
it is okay to use a simple key here (as we discussed previously, no need for 
UGI)?
* The tests in {{TestViewFileSystemHdfs}} LGTM, but I don't think they are 
HDFS-specific. Can we put them in {{ViewFileSystemBaseTest}}? Also you have one 
typo, {{testViewFilsSystemInnerCache}} should be 
{{testViewFileSystemInnerCache}}
* Can you describe why the changes in {{TestViewFsDefaultValue}} are necessary?
* Can you explain why the changes in 
{{TestViewFileSystemDelegationTokenSupport}} are necessary? Same for 
{{TestViewFileSystemDelegation}} -- it seems like the old way of returning the 
created {{fs}} was cleaner? I also don't understand the need for changes in 
{{testSanity()}} -- does the string comparison no longer work?

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-29 Thread Jinglun (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16918429#comment-16918429
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Hi [~xkrogen] [~xkrogen], could you help to review this, thanks !

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-20 Thread Jinglun (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16911019#comment-16911019
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Hi [~xkrogen], do you have time to review this?  Thanks~

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0006.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-14 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16907191#comment-16907191
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
36s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m 
34s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 20m 
27s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
59s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m 
17s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
20m 42s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
30s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
29s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  2m 
10s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 21m  
4s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 21m  4s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1457 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1472 total 
(was 1472) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  3m 
 4s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 294 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 294 total (was 297) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
15m  5s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m  
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m 
57s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}106m 42s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
47s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}244m 30s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestDFSUpgradeWithHA |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestMultipleNNPortQOP |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestFileCorruption |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.tools.TestDFSZKFailoverController |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.qjournal.server.TestJournalNodeSync |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestNamenodeCapacityReport |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestReconstructStripedFile |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e53b4 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12977561/HADOOP-15565.0006.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-14 Thread Jinglun (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906972#comment-16906972
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Thanks [~xkrogen] for your nice comments.
{quote}I don't think publicly exposing cacheSize() on FileSystem is a great 
idea. Can we make it package-private, and if it is needed in non-package-local 
tests, use a test utility to export it publicly?
{quote}
Reasonable! I don't want to start a new file so I'll add the test utility to 
TestFileUtil.java.
{quote}Is there a chance the cache will be accessed in a multi-threaded way? If 
so we need to harden it for concurrent access. Looks like it will only work in 
a single-threaded fashion currently. If the FS instances are actually all 
created on startup, then I think we should explicitly populate the cache on 
startup.
{quote}
The fs instances are all created on startup, I'll make the cache unmodifiable 
so we know it will only be created on startup and won't be modified anymore.
{quote}I agree that swallowing exceptions on child FS close is the right move, 
but probably we should at least put them at INFO level?
{quote}
Right! I'll change it.
{quote}This seems less strict than FileSystem.CACHE when checking for equality; 
it doesn't use the UserGroupInformation at all. I think this is safe because 
the cache is local to a single ViewFileSystem, so all of the inner cached 
instances must share the same UGI, but please help me to confirm.
{quote}
Yes, it's safe. As all the instances share the same UGI we can make the Key 
simple.
{quote}We can use Objects.hash() for the hashCode() method of Key.
{quote}
Right! That's a good practice! I'll update it.
{quote}On ViewFileSystem L257, you shouldn't initialize fs – you can just 
declare it: FileSystem fs; (this allows the compiler to help ensure that you 
remember to initialize it later)
{quote}
Right! I'll update it.

 

Upload patch-006.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-13 Thread Erik Krogen (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906520#comment-16906520
 ] 

Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Thanks for working on this [~LiJinglun]! Seems like a good problem to fix and I 
think the idea is sound.

I didn't get a chance to look at the tests yet, but I have some comments from 
an initial review of the production code:

* I don't think publicly exposing {{cacheSize()}} on {{FileSystem}} is a great 
idea. Can we make it package-private, and if it is needed in non-package-local 
tests, use a test utility to export it publicly?
* Is there a chance the cache will be accessed in a multi-threaded way? If so 
we need to harden it for concurrent access. Looks like it will only work in a 
single-threaded fashion currently. If the FS instances are actually all created 
on startup, then I think we should explicitly populate the cache on startup.
* I agree that swallowing exceptions on child FS close is the right move, but 
probably we should at least put them at INFO level?
* This seems less strict than {{FileSystem.CACHE}} when checking for equality; 
it doesn't use the {{UserGroupInformation}} at all. I think this is safe 
because the cache is local to a single {{ViewFileSystem}}, so all of the inner 
cached instances must share the same UGI, but please help me to confirm.
* We can use {{Objects.hash()}} for the {{hashCode()}} method of {{Key}}.
* On {{ViewFileSystem}} L257, you shouldn't initialize {{fs}} -- you can just 
declare it: {{FileSystem fs;}} (this allows the compiler to help ensure that 
you remember to initialize it later)

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-13 Thread Jinglun (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905932#comment-16905932
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Hi [~jojochuang] [~xkrogen] [~gabor.bota] [~hexiaoqiao], patch-005 is ready 
now. Could you help review it, thanks!

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-12 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16904959#comment-16904959
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
33s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m 
 9s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 17m 
37s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
14s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
25s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
15m 49s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
57s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
25s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 16m 
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 16m 39s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1464 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1479 total 
(was 1479) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
20s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 234 unchanged - 3 
fixed = 234 total (was 237) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
10m 19s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m 
33s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 84m  7s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  1m 
 1s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}196m 53s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestDistributedFileSystem |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.tools.TestDFSZKFailoverController |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12977281/HADOOP-15565.0005.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 4e8bf17c6176 4.4.0-139-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 24 
10:58:50 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-11 Thread Jinglun (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16904842#comment-16904842
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Thanks a lot [~jojochuang] for pointing it out. Yes it's related and can be 
solved by the inner-cache too. I add a new test case for the deleteOnExit 
situation.

The javac failure are caused by calling deprecated methods in 
TestChrootedFileSystem.java by the old unit tests. I think we can fix the javac 
problem in a new jira. Here we just ignore it.

The unit tests all passed on my local pc except 
[org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport.testBlockReportSucceedsWithLargerLengthLimit|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/16464/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode/TestLargeBlockReport/testBlockReportSucceedsWithLargerLengthLimit/].
 It failed with and without the patch. 

 

Upload patch-005 and wait jenkins.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch, HADOOP-15565.0005.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-09 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16904283#comment-16904283
 ] 

Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

HDFS-10323 looks related.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch, HADOOP-15565.0004.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16903829#comment-16903829
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
55s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
42s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 33m 
20s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 20m 
52s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  3m 
 2s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m 
41s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
23m 17s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m 
12s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
37s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
28s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  2m 
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 20m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 20m 51s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 15 new + 1464 unchanged - 15 fixed = 1479 total 
(was 1479) {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
2m 56s{color} | {color:orange} root: The patch generated 2 new + 234 unchanged 
- 3 fixed = 236 total (was 237) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m 
14s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 25s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m 
33s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}137m 43s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  2m 
38s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}293m 34s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFSImageWithAcl |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestReconstructStripedFileWithRandomECPolicy |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.0 Server=19.03.0 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e53b4 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12977102/HADOOP-15565.0004.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 9536fe002124 4.15.0-52-generic #56-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 4 
22:49:08 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-09 Thread Jinglun (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16903600#comment-16903600
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

These 6 tests are related. They all rely on FileSystem.CACHE to get the 
children filesystems. Since the children filesystems are not cached in 
FileSystem.CACHE any more, the unit tests failed. The ViewFileSystem already 
has the method getChildFileSystems() and we can use it to fix the unit tests.


org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestChRootedFileSystem.testListLocatedFileStatus
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegation.testAclMethods
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegation.testVerifyChecksum
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegationTokenSupport.testGetChildFileSystems
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegationTokenSupport.testAddDelegationTokens
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsDefaultValue.testGetDefaultReplication

 

Upload patch-004.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-08 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16903307#comment-16903307
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
42s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
15s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 26m 
21s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 23m 
40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m 
12s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
18m 12s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m 
43s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
32s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
26s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  2m 
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 24m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 24m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
2m 22s{color} | {color:orange} root: The patch generated 2 new + 152 unchanged 
- 0 fixed = 154 total (was 152) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
11m 44s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  9m 53s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 96m 59s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
52s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}242m 40s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestChRootedFileSystem |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegationTokenSupport |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegation |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsDefaultValue |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestBootstrapAliasmap |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeErasureCodingMetrics |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestMaintenanceState |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12977043/HADOOP-15565.0003.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-08 Thread Jinglun (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16902986#comment-16902986
 ] 

Jinglun commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

Thanks [~gabor.bota] for your nice comments. I add more unit tests and change 
some variables name to make the code more readable. The description is also 
updated.

Upload patch-003 and pend jenkins.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch, 
> HADOOP-15565.0003.patch
>
>
> ViewFileSystem.close() does nothing but remove itself from FileSystem.CACHE. 
> It's children filesystems are cached in FileSystem.CACHE and shared by all 
> the ViewFileSystem instances. We could't simply close all the children 
> filesystems because it will break the semantic of FileSystem.newInstance().
> We might add an inner cache to ViewFileSystem, let it cache all the children 
> filesystems. The children filesystems are not shared any more. When 
> ViewFileSystem is closed we close all the children filesystems in the inner 
> cache. The ViewFileSystem is still cached by FileSystem.CACHE so there won't 
> be too many FileSystem instances.
> The FileSystem.CACHE caches the ViewFileSysem instance and the other 
> instances(the children filesystems) are cached in the inner cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-08-05 Thread Gabor Bota (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1697#comment-1697
 ] 

Gabor Bota commented on HADOOP-15565:
-

Thanks for working on this [~LiJinglun]!

> I think we should let FileSystem.CACHE cache ViewFileSystem only, and let 
> ViewFileSystem cache all it's child filesystems.
You mean that the {{FileSystem.CACHE}} will only cache *one instance* of  
{{ViewFileSystem}}, and the {{ViewFileSystem}} will handle other instances 
right? If you mean that (based on the code you do) please correct the 
description.

It would be also good to see more test fore this change: 
* Unit tests for the {{ViewFileSystem#SimpleCache}}.
* Based on the description you had a problem with "re-login my kerberos and 
renew ViewFileSystem periodically". Could you write a test case where this is 
reproduced to show that this change will solve that issue?



> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch
>
>
> When we create a ViewFileSystem, all it's child filesystems will be cached by 
> FileSystem.CACHE. Unless we close these child filesystems, they will stay in 
> FileSystem.CACHE forever.
> I think we should let FileSystem.CACHE cache ViewFileSystem only, and let 
> ViewFileSystem cache all it's child filesystems. So we can close 
> ViewFileSystem without leak and won't affect other ViewFileSystems.
> I find this problem because i need to re-login my kerberos and renew 
> ViewFileSystem periodically. Because FileSystem.CACHE.Key is based on 
> UserGroupInformation, which changes everytime i re-login, I can't use the 
> cached child filesystems when i new a ViewFileSystem. And because 
> ViewFileSystem.close does nothing but remove itself from cache, i leak all 
> it's child filesystems in cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-07-31 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16896885#comment-16896885
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
33s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  7m 
35s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 20m 
 1s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 16m 
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
19s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
17m 31s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
56s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 18m 
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 18m 
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
2m 46s{color} | {color:orange} root: The patch generated 8 new + 68 unchanged - 
0 fixed = 76 total (was 68) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m 
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m  0s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m 
51s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}107m 55s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}238m  4s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.tools.TestDFSZKFailoverController |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestNamenodeCapacityReport |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e53b4 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12929510/HADOOP-15565.0002.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 3b05e6febfbe 4.15.0-54-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24 
10:55:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2019-07-30 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16896698#comment-16896698
 ] 

Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-15565:
--

This is the same as HDFS-14645.

> ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem 
> objects leak.
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-15565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jinglun
>Assignee: Jinglun
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15565.0001.patch, HADOOP-15565.0002.patch
>
>
> When we create a ViewFileSystem, all it's child filesystems will be cached by 
> FileSystem.CACHE. Unless we close these child filesystems, they will stay in 
> FileSystem.CACHE forever.
> I think we should let FileSystem.CACHE cache ViewFileSystem only, and let 
> ViewFileSystem cache all it's child filesystems. So we can close 
> ViewFileSystem without leak and won't affect other ViewFileSystems.
> I find this problem because i need to re-login my kerberos and renew 
> ViewFileSystem periodically. Because FileSystem.CACHE.Key is based on 
> UserGroupInformation, which changes everytime i re-login, I can't use the 
> cached child filesystems when i new a ViewFileSystem. And because 
> ViewFileSystem.close does nothing but remove itself from cache, i leak all 
> it's child filesystems in cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2018-06-28 Thread genericqa (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16526061#comment-16526061
 ] 

genericqa commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 25m 
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 27m 
48s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
32s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 54s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
24s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
48s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
18s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 27m 
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 27m 
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
10m 51s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m 
18s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 96m  
2s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
43s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}229m 56s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:abb62dd |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12929510/HADOOP-15565.0002.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux ba0f5edaec29 3.13.0-137-generic #186-Ubuntu SMP Mon Dec 4 
19:09:19 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 8752a48 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_171 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/14826/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 2762 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C: 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-15565) ViewFileSystem.close doesn't close child filesystems and causes FileSystem objects leak.

2018-06-27 Thread genericqa (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16524671#comment-16524671
 ] 

genericqa commented on HADOOP-15565:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
37s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 25m 
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 27m 
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
15s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 50s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m  
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
53s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 27m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 27m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
10m 57s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  8m 29s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 93m 23s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
43s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}227m 51s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegation |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemDelegationTokenSupport |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestChRootedFileSystem |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.tools.TestViewFSStoragePolicyCommands |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemLinkMergeSlash |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemLinkFallback |
|   | hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsDefaultValue |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:abb62dd |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-15565 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12929316/HADOOP-15565.0001.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux ea81d02eb142 3.13.0-137-generic #186-Ubuntu