Re: Local jobtracker in test env?
Yes, singular JVM (The test JVM itself) and the latter approach (no TT/JT daemons). On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Mohit Anchlia mohitanch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Harsh J ha...@cloudera.com wrote: It used the local mode of operation: org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner In localmode everything is done inside the same JVM i.e. tasktracker,jobtracker etc. all run in the same JVM. Or does it mean that none of those processes run everything is pipelined in the same process on the local file system. A JobTracker (via MiniMRCluster) is only required for simulating distributed tests. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Mohit Anchlia mohitanch...@gmail.com wrote: I just wrote a test where fs.default.name is file:/// and mapred.job.tracker is set to local. The test ran fine, I also see mapper and reducer were invoked but what I am trying to understand is that how did this run without specifying the job tracker port and which port task tracker connected with job tracker. It's not clear from the output: Also what's the difference between this and bringing up miniDFS cluster? INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat [main]: Total input paths to proc ess : 1 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Running job: job_local_0001 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task [Thread-11]: Using ResourceCalculatorPlugin : null INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask [Thread-11]: numReduceTasks: 1 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask [Thread-11]: io.sort.mb = 100 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask [Thread-11]: data buffer = 79691776/99614 720 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask [Thread-11]: record buffer = 262144/32768 0 INFO com.i.cg.services.dp.analytics.hadoop.mapred.GeoLookup [Thread-11]: z ip 92127 INFO com.i.cg.services.dp.analytics.hadoop.mapred.GeoLookup [Thread-11]: z ip 1 INFO com.i.cg.services.dp.analytics.hadoop.mapred.GeoLookup [Thread-11]: z ip 92127 INFO com.i.cg.services.dp.analytics.hadoop.mapred.GeoLookup [Thread-11]: z ip 1 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask [Thread-11]: Starting flush of map output INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask [Thread-11]: Finished spill 0 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task [Thread-11]: Task:attempt_local_0001_m_0 0_0 is done. And is in the process of commiting INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner [Thread-11]: file:/c:/upb/dp/manch lia-dp/depot/services/data-platform/trunk/analytics/geoinput/geo.dat:0+18 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task [Thread-11]: Task 'attempt_local_0001_m_ 00_0' done. INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task [Thread-11]: Using ResourceCalculatorPlugin : null INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner [Thread-11]: INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger [Thread-11]: Merging 1 sorted segments INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger [Thread-11]: Down to the last merge-pass, with 1 segments left of total size: 26 bytes INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner [Thread-11]: INFO com.i.cg.services.dp.analytics.hadoop.mapred.GeoLookup [Thread-11]: I nside reduce INFO com.i.cg.services.dp.analytics.hadoop.mapred.GeoLookup [Thread-11]: O utside reduce INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task [Thread-11]: Task:attempt_local_0001_r_0 0_0 is done. And is in the process of commiting INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner [Thread-11]: INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task [Thread-11]: Task attempt_local_0001_r_0 0_0 is allowed to commit now INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileOutputCommitter [Thread-11]: Saved output of task 'attempt_local_0001_r_00_0' to file:/c:/upb/dp/manchlia-dp/depot/servic es/data-platform/trunk/analytics/geooutput INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner [Thread-11]: reduce reduce INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task [Thread-11]: Task 'attempt_local_0001_r_ 00_0' done. INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: map 100% reduce 100% INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Job complete: job_local_0001 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Counters: 15 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: FileSystemCounters INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: FILE_BYTES_READ=458 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=96110 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Map-Reduce Framework INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Map input records=2 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Reduce shuffle bytes=0 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Spilled Records=4 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Map output bytes=20 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Total committed heap usage (bytes)=321527808 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient [main]: Map input bytes=18 INFO
Re: mkdir fails
Hi, Are you using windows? If yes and possible then you can try out Ubuntu, its almost like windows.Most of the people use ubuntu for hadoop. If its for design environment on windows then you can try Virtual box ( or WM ware) with ubuntu. I am using hadoop in ubuntu, so did not faced this problem. Regards, Saravanan Nagarajan On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Mohit Anchlia mohitanch...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to bringup mini cluster and it keeps failing even though I have right permissions on the directory: The below file exists and there seems to be a symlink to a path that doesn't fully exist. Could someone help me point on the right direction? INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JvmManager [Thread-140]: In JvmRunner constructed JVM ID: jvm_20120807175927090_0001_m_-1041109238 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JvmManager [Thread-140]: JVM Runner jvm_20120807175927090_0001_m_-1041109238 spawned. WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DefaultTaskController [JVM Runner jvm_20120807175927090_0001_m_-1041109238 spawned.]: Unexpected error launching task JVM java.io.IOException: Mkdirs failed to create C:\upb\dp\manchlia-dp\depot\services\data-platform\trunk\analytics\build\log\userlogs\job_20120807175927090_0001\attempt_20120807175927090_0001_m_01_0 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DefaultTaskController.launchTask(DefaultTaskController.java:108) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JvmManager$JvmManagerForType$JvmRunner.runChild(JvmManager.java:497) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JvmManager$JvmManagerForType$JvmRunner.run(JvmManager.java:471) INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JvmManager [JVM Runner jvm_20120807175927090_0001_m_-1041109238 spawned.]: JVM Not killed jvm_20120807175927090_0001_m_-1041109238 but just removed WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner [Thread-140]: attempt_20120807175927090_0001_m_01_0 : Child Error java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of -1. at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:229) INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JvmManager [JVM Runner jvm_20120807175927090_0001_m_-1041109238 spawned.]: JVM : jvm_20120807175927090_0001_m_-1041109238 exited with exit code -1. Number of tasks it ran: 0 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskInProgress [IPC Server handler 1 on 54311]: Error from attempt_20120807175927090_0001_m_01_0: java.lang.Throwable: Child Error at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:242) Caused by: java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of -1. at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:229)
Problem with hadoop filesystem after restart cluster
Hello! I have problem with hadoop filesystem after restart cluster. When i execute command: 'hadoop fs -ls / ' it doesn't show any directories. I'm sure that before restart there was some directories (for example /user). Do I have to start any processes? Any help would be appreciate -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-hadoop-filesystem-after-restart-cluster-tp34271149p34271149.html Sent from the Hadoop core-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Problem with hadoop filesystem after restart cluster
Hi Andy Is your hadoop.tmp.dir or dfs.name.dir configured to /tmp? If so it can happen as /tmp dir gets wiped out on OS restarts Regards Bejoy KS
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
Now that's a loaded question. I'm going to plead the 5th because no matter how I answer it, I will probably piss someone off. ;-P They all have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. (Like that's stopped me before. ;-) -Mike On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I have a very basic question - There are various flavors of hadoop by Apache, Cloudera, MapR, HortonWorks(may be more I am not aware of). I would like to learn what are the differences between these distributions and how do I know which distribution is best for me? I am current using Apache Hadoop Thank you + Harit
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
That's a bit like asking people what the best Linux Distro is..they all serve (mostly) the same function, and you're likely to start a religious war by stating their differences. The main point running through all the different flavors of Hadoop is that they are all Hadoop. The differences only come from the chosen patch sets, which are all open-sourced anyway. At least in theory, you could rebuild Cloudera/Hortonworks/whatever just by applying the right sequences of patch sets to core Hadoop. The real question is: Are you happy with what you are currently using? If so, why worry about it? If not, why are you unhappy? Answering that question is likely to give you the guidance you would like in terms of what flavor you wish to pick. Scott On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: Now that's a loaded question. I'm going to plead the 5th because no matter how I answer it, I will probably piss someone off. ;-P They all have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. (Like that's stopped me before. ;-) -Mike On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I have a very basic question - There are various flavors of hadoop by Apache, Cloudera, MapR, HortonWorks(may be more I am not aware of). I would like to learn what are the differences between these distributions and how do I know which distribution is best for me? I am current using Apache Hadoop Thank you + Harit
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
I agree with Scoot! The first question to answer is Do you have a problem with your current distribution? Thanks Serge On 8/8/12 9:17 AM, Scott Fines scottfi...@gmail.com wrote: That's a bit like asking people what the best Linux Distro is..they all serve (mostly) the same function, and you're likely to start a religious war by stating their differences. The main point running through all the different flavors of Hadoop is that they are all Hadoop. The differences only come from the chosen patch sets, which are all open-sourced anyway. At least in theory, you could rebuild Cloudera/Hortonworks/whatever just by applying the right sequences of patch sets to core Hadoop. The real question is: Are you happy with what you are currently using? If so, why worry about it? If not, why are you unhappy? Answering that question is likely to give you the guidance you would like in terms of what flavor you wish to pick. Scott On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: Now that's a loaded question. I'm going to plead the 5th because no matter how I answer it, I will probably piss someone off. ;-P They all have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. (Like that's stopped me before. ;-) -Mike On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I have a very basic question - There are various flavors of hadoop by Apache, Cloudera, MapR, HortonWorks(may be more I am not aware of). I would like to learn what are the differences between these distributions and how do I know which distribution is best for me? I am current using Apache Hadoop Thank you + Harit
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
Well Scott kinda side stepped MapR in his response. ;-) On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Serge Blazhiyevskyy serge.blazhiyevs...@nice.com wrote: I agree with Scoot! The first question to answer is Do you have a problem with your current distribution? Thanks Serge On 8/8/12 9:17 AM, Scott Fines scottfi...@gmail.com wrote: That's a bit like asking people what the best Linux Distro is..they all serve (mostly) the same function, and you're likely to start a religious war by stating their differences. The main point running through all the different flavors of Hadoop is that they are all Hadoop. The differences only come from the chosen patch sets, which are all open-sourced anyway. At least in theory, you could rebuild Cloudera/Hortonworks/whatever just by applying the right sequences of patch sets to core Hadoop. The real question is: Are you happy with what you are currently using? If so, why worry about it? If not, why are you unhappy? Answering that question is likely to give you the guidance you would like in terms of what flavor you wish to pick. Scott On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: Now that's a loaded question. I'm going to plead the 5th because no matter how I answer it, I will probably piss someone off. ;-P They all have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. (Like that's stopped me before. ;-) -Mike On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I have a very basic question - There are various flavors of hadoop by Apache, Cloudera, MapR, HortonWorks(may be more I am not aware of). I would like to learn what are the differences between these distributions and how do I know which distribution is best for me? I am current using Apache Hadoop Thank you + Harit
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
Oh no! it begins! ;) On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Michael Segel wrote: Well Scott kinda side stepped MapR in his response. ;-) On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Serge Blazhiyevskyy serge.blazhiyevs...@nice.com wrote: I agree with Scoot! The first question to answer is Do you have a problem with your current distribution? Thanks Serge On 8/8/12 9:17 AM, Scott Fines scottfi...@gmail.com wrote: That's a bit like asking people what the best Linux Distro is..they all serve (mostly) the same function, and you're likely to start a religious war by stating their differences. The main point running through all the different flavors of Hadoop is that they are all Hadoop. The differences only come from the chosen patch sets, which are all open-sourced anyway. At least in theory, you could rebuild Cloudera/Hortonworks/whatever just by applying the right sequences of patch sets to core Hadoop. The real question is: Are you happy with what you are currently using? If so, why worry about it? If not, why are you unhappy? Answering that question is likely to give you the guidance you would like in terms of what flavor you wish to pick. Scott On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: Now that's a loaded question. I'm going to plead the 5th because no matter how I answer it, I will probably piss someone off. ;-P They all have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. (Like that's stopped me before. ;-) -Mike On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I have a very basic question - There are various flavors of hadoop by Apache, Cloudera, MapR, HortonWorks(may be more I am not aware of). I would like to learn what are the differences between these distributions and how do I know which distribution is best for me? I am current using Apache Hadoop Thank you + Harit
Re: is HDFS RAID data locality efficient?
Nice explanation guys .. thanks Syed Abdul kather send from Samsung S3 On Aug 9, 2012 12:02 AM, Ajit Ratnaparkhi [via Lucene] ml-node+s472066n32...@n3.nabble.com wrote: Agreed with Steve. That is most important use of HDFS RAID, where you consume less disk space with same reliability and availability guarantee at cost of processing performance. Most of data in hdfs is cold data, without HDFS RAID you end up maintaining 3 replicas of data which is hardly going to be processed again, but you cant remove/move this data to separate archive because if required processing should be as soon as possible. -Ajit On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Steve Loughran [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=322i=0 wrote: On 8 August 2012 09:46, Sourygna Luangsay [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=322i=1 wrote: Hi folks! One of the scenario I can think in order to take advantage of HDFS RAID without suffering this penalty is:** **- **Using normal HDFS with default replication=3 for my “fresh data” **- **Using HDFS RAID for my historical data (that is barely used by M/R) ** ** exactly: less space use on cold data, with the penalty that access performance can be worse. As the majority of data on a hadoop cluster is usually cold, it's a space and power efficient story for the archive data -- Steve Loughran Hortonworks Inc -- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-HDFS-RAID-data-locality-efficient-tp3999891p322.html To unsubscribe from Lucene, click herehttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=472066code=aW4uYWJkdWxAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ3MjA2NnwxMDczOTUyNDEw . NAMLhttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml - THANKS AND REGARDS, SYED ABDUL KATHER -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-HDFS-RAID-data-locality-efficient-tp3999891p324.html Sent from the Hadoop lucene-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
nah! I am happy with Apache Hadoop as I am learning but saw so many distributions so wanted to know about them On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: hey all have their own respective strengths and wea
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
I recently stepped into this Forrester report, may give you more information to consider for a decision: http://www.forrester.com/dl/The+Forrester+Wave+Enterprise+Hadoop+Solutions+Q1+2012/-/E-RES60755/PDF?oid=1-KCJIQAaction=PDFobjectid=RES60755 Regards On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: nah! I am happy with Apache Hadoop as I am learning but saw so many distributions so wanted to know about them On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: hey all have their own respective strengths and wea
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
Uhm... I'd take that report with a grain of salt. ;-) On Aug 8, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Alberto Ortiz aort...@gmail.com wrote: I recently stepped into this Forrester report, may give you more information to consider for a decision: http://www.forrester.com/dl/The+Forrester+Wave+Enterprise+Hadoop+Solutions+Q1+2012/-/E-RES60755/PDF?oid=1-KCJIQAaction=PDFobjectid=RES60755 Regards On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: nah! I am happy with Apache Hadoop as I am learning but saw so many distributions so wanted to know about them On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: hey all have their own respective strengths and wea
Re: creating cluster to analyze unsubscribe emails
:-) Syed Abdul kather send from Samsung S3 On Aug 9, 2012 4:42 AM, Hennig, Ryan [via Lucene] ml-node+s472066n370...@n3.nabble.com wrote: Hello, ** ** I’m thinking about building a hadoop cluster to analyze all the unsubscribe mails that people mistakenly send to this address. How many PB of storage will I need? ** ** - Ryan -- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/creating-cluster-to-analyze-unsubscribe-emails-tp370.html To unsubscribe from Lucene, click herehttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=472066code=aW4uYWJkdWxAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ3MjA2NnwxMDczOTUyNDEw . NAMLhttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml - THANKS AND REGARDS, SYED ABDUL KATHER -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/creating-cluster-to-analyze-unsubscribe-emails-tp370p392.html Sent from the Hadoop lucene-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Learning about different distributions of Hadoop
would go through it, thank you very much! On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Alberto Ortiz wrote: I recently stepped into this Forrester report, may give you more information to consider for a decision: http://www.forrester.com/dl/The+Forrester+Wave+Enterprise+Hadoop+Solutions+Q1+2012/-/E-RES60755/PDF?oid=1-KCJIQAaction=PDFobjectid=RES60755 Regards On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Harit Himanshu harit.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote: nah! I am happy with Apache Hadoop as I am learning but saw so many distributions so wanted to know about them On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Michael Segel wrote: hey all have their own respective strengths and wea
Re: Hadoop list?
Yes Ryan .. welcome to Hadoop community .. Syed Abdul kather send from Samsung S3 On Aug 9, 2012 10:34 AM, Ryan Rosario [via Lucene] ml-node+s472066n429...@n3.nabble.com wrote: Is this the correct list for Hadoop help? -- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hadoop-list-tp429.html To unsubscribe from Lucene, click herehttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=472066code=aW4uYWJkdWxAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ3MjA2NnwxMDczOTUyNDEw . NAMLhttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml - THANKS AND REGARDS, SYED ABDUL KATHER -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hadoop-list-tp429p433.html Sent from the Hadoop lucene-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ***LIST MANAGER***
Aren't these people able to read the other unsubscribe mail threads?? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: How hard would it be to block **ALL** messages with unsubscribe in the title? -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
Re: ***LIST MANAGER***
They are trolls, they should be banned --Mensaje original-- De: Viji R Para: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Responder a: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Asunto: Re: ***LIST MANAGER*** Enviado: 9 de ago, 2012 00:11 Aren't these people able to read the other unsubscribe mail threads?? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: How hard would it be to block **ALL** messages with unsubscribe in the title? -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon Enviado desde un dispositivo BlackBerry® de Tigo
Re: ***LIST MANAGER***
Some people are ignorant and lazy!! I think, How to unsubscribe a mailing list?? should become one of the Career Cup/Interview question. Its really hard!! On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Viji R v...@cloudera.com wrote: Aren't these people able to read the other unsubscribe mail threads?? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: How hard would it be to block **ALL** messages with unsubscribe in the title? -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon -- Thanks Regards, Anil Gupta
Re: ***LIST MANAGER***
No, they should be taken out back and shot... On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:15 PM, anil gupta anilgupt...@gmail.com wrote: Some people are ignorant and lazy!! I think, How to unsubscribe a mailing list?? should become one of the Career Cup/Interview question. Its really hard!! On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Viji R v...@cloudera.com wrote: Aren't these people able to read the other unsubscribe mail threads?? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: How hard would it be to block **ALL** messages with unsubscribe in the title? -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon -- Thanks Regards, Anil Gupta -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
Re: ***LIST MANAGER***
I'm takng a wild guess, but i think they are legitimately trying to unsubscribe but are clueless and don't RTFM On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Viji R v...@cloudera.com wrote: Are these people trying to pull our legs, or are they genuinely making this mistake? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: No, they should be taken out back and shot... On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:15 PM, anil gupta anilgupt...@gmail.com wrote: Some people are ignorant and lazy!! I think, How to unsubscribe a mailing list?? should become one of the Career Cup/Interview question. Its really hard!! On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Viji R v...@cloudera.com wrote: Aren't these people able to read the other unsubscribe mail threads?? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: How hard would it be to block **ALL** messages with unsubscribe in the title? -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon -- Thanks Regards, Anil Gupta -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
Re: ***LIST MANAGER***
Are these people trying to pull our legs, or are they genuinely making this mistake? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: No, they should be taken out back and shot... On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:15 PM, anil gupta anilgupt...@gmail.com wrote: Some people are ignorant and lazy!! I think, How to unsubscribe a mailing list?? should become one of the Career Cup/Interview question. Its really hard!! On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Viji R v...@cloudera.com wrote: Aren't these people able to read the other unsubscribe mail threads?? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: How hard would it be to block **ALL** messages with unsubscribe in the title? -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon -- Thanks Regards, Anil Gupta -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
