Regarding Parrallel Iron's claim
Hi, Does anyone know any discussion in Apache Hadoop regarding the claim by Parrallel Iron with their patent against use of HDFS? Thanks in advance. Regards, JS
Re: Regarding Parrallel Iron's claim
Isn't that old news? http://www.dbms2.com/2011/06/10/patent-nonsense-parallel-ironhdfs-edition/ Googling around, doesn't seem anything happened after that. J-D On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:52 PM, JS Jang jsja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone know any discussion in Apache Hadoop regarding the claim by Parrallel Iron with their patent against use of HDFS? Thanks in advance. Regards, JS
Re: Regarding Parrallel Iron's claim
I appreciate your help, J-D. Yes, I wondered whether there was any update since or previous discussion within Apache Hadoop as I am new in this mailing list. On 12/9/11 12:19 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: Isn't that old news? http://www.dbms2.com/2011/06/10/patent-nonsense-parallel-ironhdfs-edition/ Googling around, doesn't seem anything happened after that. J-D On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:52 PM, JS Jangjsja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone know any discussion in Apache Hadoop regarding the claim by Parrallel Iron with their patent against use of HDFS? Thanks in advance. Regards, JS -- 장정식 / jsj...@gruter.com (주)그루터, RD팀 수석 www.gruter.com Cloud, Search and Social
Re: Regarding Parrallel Iron's claim
You could just look at the archives: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-user/ It is also indexed by all search engines. J-D On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:44 PM, JS Jang jsja...@gmail.com wrote: I appreciate your help, J-D. Yes, I wondered whether there was any update since or previous discussion within Apache Hadoop as I am new in this mailing list. On 12/9/11 12:19 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: Isn't that old news? http://www.dbms2.com/2011/06/10/patent-nonsense-parallel-ironhdfs-edition/ Googling around, doesn't seem anything happened after that. J-D On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:52 PM, JS Jangjsja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone know any discussion in Apache Hadoop regarding the claim by Parrallel Iron with their patent against use of HDFS? Thanks in advance. Regards, JS -- 장정식 / jsj...@gruter.com (주)그루터, RD팀 수석 www.gruter.com Cloud, Search and Social
Re: Regarding Parrallel Iron's claim
Got it. Thanks again, J-D. On 12/9/11 12:54 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: You could just look at the archives: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-user/ It is also indexed by all search engines. J-D On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:44 PM, JS Jang jsja...@gmail.com wrote: I appreciate your help, J-D. Yes, I wondered whether there was any update since or previous discussion within Apache Hadoop as I am new in this mailing list. On 12/9/11 12:19 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: Isn't that old news? http://www.dbms2.com/2011/06/10/patent-nonsense-parallel-ironhdfs-edition/ Googling around, doesn't seem anything happened after that. J-D On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:52 PM, JS Jangjsja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone know any discussion in Apache Hadoop regarding the claim by Parrallel Iron with their patent against use of HDFS? Thanks in advance. Regards, JS -- 장정식 / jsj...@gruter.com (주)그루터, RD팀 수석 www.gruter.com Cloud, Search and Social -- 장정식 / jsj...@gruter.com (주)그루터, RD팀 수석 www.gruter.com Cloud, Search and Social
