Re: [BeanUtils] Could be changedpropertyUtilsBean.findNextNestedInde x(String expression) modifier toprotected ?
robert burrell donkin wrote: my much-lovely cube blew up recently and my secondary development box is needing quite a bit of tweaking. please create a bug report so this doesn't get lost. (you might also need to remind me in a week or so if i don't get round to it by then.) Ok, I'll do it tomorrow in the morning. RIP lovely cube. Marc DeXeT - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jexl BeanUtils] Why not extend Jexl or beanutils to match same map syntax ?
Hi. This message is for jexl and beanutils folks. I'm using both of them, as many people I presume. Both of them share _almost_ the same syntax but for mapped access. Jexl uses square brackets as bean.map[key] and beanUtils uses parentheses bean.map(key) To my opinion it could be a good idea to extends jexl to uses also beanutils parentheses syntax. What are you thinking about this ? Marc DeXeT - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Jexl BeanUtils] Why not extend Jexl or beanutils to match same map syntax ?
Matt Sgarlata wrote: shameless-plug The Morph framework (morph.sourceforge.net) supports either syntax out-of-the box. Morph had its first beta release yesterday. For a comparison of Morph to JEXL, see http://morph.sourceforge.net/alternatives/jexl.html For a comparison of Morph to BeanUtils, see http://morph.sourceforge.net/alternatives/beanutils.html /shameless-plug It seems' to be a nice framework, but I'm working with jelly so need jexl :) Marc DeXeT - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
