Can you supply a test case demonstrating the problem
please ;-) The serialization aspects were new in
collections 3.1 so may have an odd bug.
Stephen
--- Marc Jambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have met a strange problem while
> serializing/deserializing LRUMaps.
>
> I am performing the following operations in my code:
> 1) If serialized file exists, deserialize LRUMap
> 2) Fill LRUMap
> 3) Serialize LRUMap to file
>
> I run my program several times, and the memory is
> growing over and over
> at each run ! After 10 runs the deserialization of a
> file of 1850 bytes
> ends up in taking 300megs in memory. The strange
> thing is that :
>
> * The number of entries is the same each time
> * The size of the file cache on disk is always the
> same (though the file
> is modified)
>
> I replaced the LRUMap with a classical HashMap and
> do not have any
> memory problem.
>
> Any clue ? Is there some kind of memory leak ?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> o--o
> | Marc Jambert |
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> | |
> | (tel) 05-67-77-19-72 |
> | (fax) 05-67-77-19-98 |
> o--o
> |Vega Technologies |
> o--o
>
>
>
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
