[Digester] Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] - [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
I haven't got any response/comment on this patch I submitted a week ago. Some feedback please. :-) At 09:56 am 25-09-2002, you wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756 [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Patch] |[Patch] |CallMethodRule/CallParamRule|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-25 01:55 --- It seems the fix from Bug#11693 has addressed (partly?) the last issue that CallMethodRule didn't work correctly in nested situation. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John Yu -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Digester] Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] - [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
Hi John, I'd also like to see the functionality you describe in Digester. I needed to do equivalent changes in my local workspace to meet the requirements of my use cases, but my personal patch queue against Digester is still not cleared so ... :-P Just to add a bit of pressure behind this issue ;-P John Yu wrote: I haven't got any response/comment on this patch I submitted a week ago. Some feedback please. :-) At 09:56 am 25-09-2002, you wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756 [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Patch] |[Patch] |CallMethodRule/CallParamRule|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-25 01:55 --- It seems the fix from Bug#11693 has addressed (partly?) the last issue that CallMethodRule didn't work correctly in nested situation. -- Christopher Lenz /=/ cmlenz at gmx.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
