Re: [Digester] Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] - [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule

[Christopher Lenz]

Hi John,

I'd also like to see the functionality you describe in Digester. I 
needed to do equivalent changes in my local workspace to meet the 
requirements of my use cases, but my personal patch queue against 
Digester is still not cleared so ... :-P

Just to add a bit of pressure behind this issue ;-P

John Yu wrote:
> 
> I haven't got any response/comment on this patch I submitted a week ago.
> Some feedback please. >:-)
> 
> At 09:56 am 25-09-2002, you wrote:
> 
>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
>> .
>> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
>> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>>
>> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756
>>
>> [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>>
>>What|Removed |Added
>>  
>>
>> Summary|[Patch] |[Patch]
>>
>> |CallMethodRule/CallParamRule|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>>
>>
>>
>> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-09-25 01:55 
>> ---
>> It seems the fix from Bug#11693 has addressed (partly?) the last issue 
>> that
>> CallMethodRule didn't work correctly in nested situation.

-- 
Christopher Lenz
/=/ cmlenz at gmx.de


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

[Digester] Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] - [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule

[John Yu]

I haven't got any response/comment on this patch I submitted a week ago.
Some feedback please. >:-)


At 09:56 am 25-09-2002, you wrote:
>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756
>
>[Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
> Summary|[Patch] |[Patch]
>|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>
>
>
>--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-09-25 01:55 ---
>It seems the fix from Bug#11693 has addressed (partly?) the last issue that
>CallMethodRule didn't work correctly in nested situation.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>For additional commands, e-mail: 

-- 
John Yu


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: