[JEXL] Site
I've refreshed the JEXL site [1]. The site was built with JDK1.4, but that shouldn't be a concern. I'll try to look at the Javadoc warnings [2],[3] probably over the next weekend. If you notice any site regressions, ping this thread. -Rahul [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/ [2] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/javadoc.html [3] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/javadoc-warnings-report.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [JEXL] Site
Thanks Rahul. Do you want me to start some documentation on the new features in 1.0.1? And since there are new features, should we call this release 1.1? On 2/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've refreshed the JEXL site [1]. The site was built with JDK1.4, but that shouldn't be a concern. I'll try to look at the Javadoc warnings [2],[3] probably over the next weekend. If you notice any site regressions, ping this thread. -Rahul [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/ [2] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/javadoc.html [3] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/javadoc-warnings-report.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
Re: [JEXL] Site
On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Rahul. Do you want me to start some documentation on the new features in 1.0.1? snip/ Ideally, it helps if someone *else* documents the new features, but I need to wrap up on some [scxml] tickets / documentation for now, so I guess if you start, it'll be much faster. And since there are new features, should we call this release 1.1? snap/ I don't think we can squeeze this out as a 1.0.1. Besides, IMO, JEXL is truly approaching 1.1 material. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
