Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant
On 3/27/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *ping* > > In case this one has dropped off of the TODO lists. > Still on the list, and within the next 24 hours. -Rahul > Hen > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant
*ping* In case this one has dropped off of the TODO lists. Hen On 3/14/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > Demote [latka] to dormant status > > +1 > Simon Kitching > Henri Yandell > Robert Burrell Donkin > Dion Gillard > Niall Pemberton > Torsten Curdt > Stephen Colebourne > Brian Wallace (non binding) > > +0 > Sandy McArthur > > Vote passes - move to dormant > > > > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > +1 > Simon Kitching > Henri Yandell > Robert Burrell Donkin > Stephen Colebourne > Brian Wallace (non binding) > > +0 > Dion Gillard > Sandy McArthur > Torsten Curdt > > -0 > Niall Pemberton > > Vote passes - move to dormant > None of this should prevent it being brought back later. > > I suggest that a discussion about renaming Dormat to Unmaintained starts > in a new thread. > > > I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. Rahul, you > volunteered to help move the components, so if you're still willing, the > opportunity is now there :-) > > Stephen > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant
On 14/03/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suggest that a discussion about renaming Dormat to Unmaintained starts > in a new thread. How about Doormat instead ;-) [Sorry ...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] dormancy nomenclature [WAS Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant]
On 3/14/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:25 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > > I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. > > it'd be best to get some documentation up before making the move > This came up at feedparser time, resulted in (which ofcourse you -- or anyone else -- is free to edit): http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MovingComponents -Rahul > - robert > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant
On 3/14/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. Rahul, you > volunteered to help move the components, so if you're still willing, the > opportunity is now there :-) > Yes, it was a blanket offer. Though I'll wait well beyond 72 hours since the vote(s) were called, as a general courtesy. -Rahul > Stephen > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[all] dormancy nomenclature [WAS Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant]
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:25 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > None of this should prevent it being brought back later. cool > I suggest that a discussion about renaming Dormat to Unmaintained starts > in a new thread. here's the thread :) i quite like the idea of grades of status and separating the community organisational (moving to a separate part of the repository) from the communication perspective. perhaps we allow different states of dormancy to let users know a little more. resources has a lot more interest and has a reasonable chance of being resurrected. there are interested committers who lack the energy ATM to push the component forward. if an interested developer or two stepped up then it could quite easily burst into life again. the code base is mature but limited. the only reason not to use resources is that it lacks a formal release. this is quite different from latka. > I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. it'd be best to get some documentation up before making the move - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant
Stephen Colebourne wrote: Demote [latka] to dormant status +1 Simon Kitching Henri Yandell Robert Burrell Donkin Dion Gillard Niall Pemberton Torsten Curdt Stephen Colebourne Brian Wallace (non binding) +0 Sandy McArthur Vote passes - move to dormant Demote [reosurces] to dormant status +1 Simon Kitching Henri Yandell Robert Burrell Donkin Stephen Colebourne Brian Wallace (non binding) +0 Dion Gillard Sandy McArthur Torsten Curdt -0 Niall Pemberton Vote passes - move to dormant None of this should prevent it being brought back later. I suggest that a discussion about renaming Dormat to Unmaintained starts in a new thread. I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. Rahul, you volunteered to help move the components, so if you're still willing, the opportunity is now there :-) Stephen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
