Re: [all] dormancy nomenclature [WAS Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant]
On 3/14/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:25 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > > I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. > > it'd be best to get some documentation up before making the move > This came up at feedparser time, resulted in (which ofcourse you -- or anyone else -- is free to edit): http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MovingComponents -Rahul > - robert > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[all] dormancy nomenclature [WAS Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant]
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:25 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > None of this should prevent it being brought back later. cool > I suggest that a discussion about renaming Dormat to Unmaintained starts > in a new thread. here's the thread :) i quite like the idea of grades of status and separating the community organisational (moving to a separate part of the repository) from the communication perspective. perhaps we allow different states of dormancy to let users know a little more. resources has a lot more interest and has a reasonable chance of being resurrected. there are interested committers who lack the energy ATM to push the component forward. if an interested developer or two stepped up then it could quite easily burst into life again. the code base is mature but limited. the only reason not to use resources is that it lacks a formal release. this is quite different from latka. > I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. it'd be best to get some documentation up before making the move - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]