Re: [lang] ***Utils.classForName( String) ?
Ola Berg wrote: Is the ClassUtils supposed to go into [lang]? If then, yes, if not... I (like java.lang) think that loading class per name is really core. Maybe this ClassUtils will do the same as: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/discover/apidocs/org/apache/commons/discovery/load/ClassLoaderUtils.html ? Tomek As for better and best... different algorithms in different methods, plus a recommended method that points to any of the former? /O -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] ***Utils.classForName( String) ?
Maybe this ClassUtils will do the same as: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/discover/apidocs/org/apache/commons/discovery/load/ClassLoaderUtils.html ? Not only, no. But for the class loading parts more or less yes. There is a slight overlap in functionality here. What the regular [lang] user needs is a quick replacement for Class.forName() that can be considered safe to use. /O -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
