Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
By the way, are the people involved in WordWrapUtils aware of ICU's (http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/) code to do this? (LineBreakIterator, etc.). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
For my part, I'd never heard of it in this context. Did come across it the other day when trying to build jikes and not having some GNU api [iconv]. ICU [C variant] was the alternative. http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu4j/ looks interesting. Hen On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bill Keese wrote: By the way, are the people involved in WordWrapUtils aware of ICU's (http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/) code to do this? (LineBreakIterator, etc.). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: +1 Ahem, +1 to what: +1 to keep WordWrapUtils in commons-lang for the next release but moving it into commons-text (sandbox) and deprecating it from c-l once the commons-text leaves sandbox status. Agreed. If a healthy commons-text emerged, I see no reason why WordWrapUtils shouldn't be able to head over. Unlike some of the lang.math stuff it's not as core. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
Henri Yandell wrote: Apple have a spell-checking api. It only works on OS X, but they supply a stubbed out API for deploying to other machines. Would be quite cool if your spell checker shared API with Apple's. Neat idea. The current API is for spell checking a single word, the Apple API is a somewhat higher level, with parsing words from text and dictionary management. I don't think however a com.apple.spell package would be tolerated in the ASF repository by either Apple ot the board. Is there an established procedure for creating new sandbox components (including voting and such), and if a [text] component was created could someone help bootstrap the component (Gump integration etc.)? J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
J.Pietschmann wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Apple have a spell-checking api. It only works on OS X, but they supply a stubbed out API for deploying to other machines. Would be quite cool if your spell checker shared API with Apple's. Neat idea. The current API is for spell checking a single word, the Apple API is a somewhat higher level, with parsing words from text and dictionary management. I don't think however a com.apple.spell package would be tolerated in the ASF repository by either Apple ot the board. Actually, our company has developed an open-source generic spell checking API (under an Apache/MIT-like license, I believe), in the same spirit as Commons Logging. Currently it has backends for Wintertree and Jazzy. Actually, come to think of it, I'm not sure if the Jazzy one was ever written. But it certainly has a Wintertree backend. If you're interested, we could donate this to Jakarta without much problem, and it would be possible to write additional drivers for your spelling API and for Apple's. - Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lang] WordWrapUtils
Henri Yandell wrote: We also see the addition of more Utils classes: ... WordWrapUtils RT mode: It would be interesting if WordWrap would implement Unicode TR14. I, or better the FOP project, have also a hyphenator which would also fit with the word wrapping issue. Finally I have a spell chacker (a rewrite of MySpell in Java) which searches a home. Because it loads the whole dictionary into memory, I dont consider it ready for use in long running programs, like servers. Apart from this, is anybody interested in including this type of software into [lang], or perhaps in sponsoring a [text] project in the sandbox? J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +1 However, as it was me who resurrected WordWrapUtils, I'd like to see them in a commons-proper package the sooner the better, because we're currently planning to remove our internal class from the Turbine code and we want to use it. Moving it to a commons-text package later would be really nice. Regards Henning Henri Yandell wrote: We also see the addition of more Utils classes: ... WordWrapUtils RT mode: It would be interesting if WordWrap would implement Unicode TR14. I, or better the FOP project, have also a hyphenator which would also fit with the word wrapping issue. Finally I have a spell chacker (a rewrite of MySpell in Java) which searches a home. Because it loads the whole dictionary into memory, I dont consider it ready for use in long running programs, like servers. Apart from this, is anybody interested in including this type of software into [lang], or perhaps in sponsoring a [text] project in the sandbox? J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire --- Quote of the week: It is pointless to tell people anything when you know that they won't process the message. --- Jonathan Revusky - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: +1 Ahem, +1 to what: [ ] Creating a sandbox [text] component, move WordWrapUtils there and [ ] implement TR14 [ ] add hyphenation including all utilities [ ] add spell checking [ ] improve/add stuff to WordWrapUtils in [lang] [ ] something else: However, as it was me who resurrected WordWrapUtils, I'd like to see them in a commons-proper package the sooner the better, because we're currently planning to remove our internal class from the Turbine code and we want to use it. Moving it to a commons-text package later would be really nice. Hmm, there are rules, I mean a developer community is required. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [lang] WordWrapUtils
J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: +1 Ahem, +1 to what: +1 to keep WordWrapUtils in commons-lang for the next release but moving it into commons-text (sandbox) and deprecating it from c-l once the commons-text leaves sandbox status. Regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire --- Quote of the week: It is pointless to tell people anything when you know that they won't process the message. --- Jonathan Revusky - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]