Re: Extending Apache Commons Functor
On 10/26/05, Dmitri Pissarenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > > Some of that stuff looks like it would be better suited for Commons > > Collections rather than Commons Functor, since it's merely dealing with > > Iterators (especially the reverse method). > > OK, you are probably right. > > But the question remains: what should I to put these routines into > Apache Commons Collections? You can file enhancement requests in the Apache Bugzilla (under Commons, and after choosing the appropriate component). It is customary to prefix the title/subject with [component-name]. Someone working on the component will then take a look. Thanks. -Rahul > > TIA > > Dmitri Pissarenko > -- > Dmitri Pissarenko > Software Engineer > http://dapissarenko.com > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Extending Apache Commons Functor
Open up Bugzilla issues for each of the different types of methods, I'd say. If someone has any issues/questions, they'll put a comment on the issue. If you want, you can submit a SVN patch (including your test cases) via Bugzilla and one of us can apply it. -Original Message- From: Dmitri Pissarenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:30 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Extending Apache Commons Functor Hello! > Some of that stuff looks like it would be better suited for Commons > Collections rather than Commons Functor, since it's merely dealing with > Iterators (especially the reverse method). OK, you are probably right. But the question remains: what should I to put these routines into Apache Commons Collections? TIA Dmitri Pissarenko -- Dmitri Pissarenko Software Engineer http://dapissarenko.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Extending Apache Commons Functor
Hello! Some of that stuff looks like it would be better suited for Commons Collections rather than Commons Functor, since it's merely dealing with Iterators (especially the reverse method). OK, you are probably right. But the question remains: what should I to put these routines into Apache Commons Collections? TIA Dmitri Pissarenko -- Dmitri Pissarenko Software Engineer http://dapissarenko.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Extending Apache Commons Functor
Dmitri, Some of that stuff looks like it would be better suited for Commons Collections rather than Commons Functor, since it's merely dealing with Iterators (especially the reverse method). -Original Message- From: Dmitri Pissarenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:09 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Extending Apache Commons Functor Hello! I want to extend Apache Commons Functor by some additional functionality, which is described at the URL below. http://dapissarenko.com/resources/2005_09_18_apacheFunctor/ What can I do in order for these functionalities to be included in the Apache Commons Functor library? TIA Dmitri Pissarenko -- Dmitri Pissarenko Software Engineer http://dapissarenko.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Extending Apache Commons Functor
Hello! I want to extend Apache Commons Functor by some additional functionality, which is described at the URL below. http://dapissarenko.com/resources/2005_09_18_apacheFunctor/ What can I do in order for these functionalities to be included in the Apache Commons Functor library? TIA Dmitri Pissarenko -- Dmitri Pissarenko Software Engineer http://dapissarenko.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
