Is there such a thing as conceptual dyslexia? I think I have it.. I left
out a parameter...
Redo those signatures:
public static byte[] encode( byte[] binaryData ) throws EncoderException
public static byte[] encode( byte[] binaryData,
boolean addNewline,
int errorLevel ) throws EncoderException
* Where errorLevel would be either Base64.IGNORE, Base64.WARN, or
Base64.EXCEPTION
Tim O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: O'brien, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:08 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [codec] base64 improved
An improved Base64 was added to a binary subpackage of
codec. Martin
Redington who is involved in xml-rpc submitted this version
of the class as he has been actively contributing to the
xml-rpc effort. This new version of the Base64 class
improves performance of the decode and also is more
compatible with RFC. There is a thread on rpc-dev to this effect:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]m
sgNo=713
So, [codec] now contains an implementation compatible with the xml-rpc
project, and the next step is to reconcile this version with the needs of
[httpclient].
Possible controversy here may be that the RFC was interpreted as requiring a
terminating newline. The RFC also mentions that a warning or exception
should be thrown when the encoder/decoder encounters invalid characters or
whitespace. My proposal is that we add a series of boolean flags, int
fields to the method signature to allow client projects to specify different
levels of RFC compliance.
public static byte[] encode( byte[] binaryData ) throws EncoderException
public static byte[] encode( byte[] binaryData, int errorLevel ) throws
EncoderException
Where errorLevel would be either Base64.IGNORE, Base64.WARN, or
Base64.EXCEPTION
Tim O'Brien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
