RE: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
I did some fixes to the Maven Ant plugin to deal better with overrides. I'll take what you sort out in build.xml and then see if I can support it in the Maven Ant plugin. As long as Email is built primarily by Maven, we will always have problems keeping the Ant script up to date without automation (or lots of attention to detail!). Thanks for the assist.. Eric -Original Message- From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 8:05 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar We appreciate all the help we can get :-) -Corey On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:35:04 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me. If the Ant script had properties to define the source URLs for these two JARs, I could point them at my local copies. The license on the JARs in question allows them to be distributed as *part* of a larger package, so my building my own copy into the nightlies is fine ... the license also says you cannot make them available *separately*, which is why having them in CVS doesn't work. Would you guys mind if I hand patched the build.xml file to see if I can get that to work? Eric Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
It's fine. Can you also do the same trick in jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/libs as well? As I sent in my email to the PMC, I thought the reason those jars are not on ibiblio is that you can't redistribute them via a website. But having them in CVS would be akin to having them in a war file, correct? You can crack open a war file and download the jar the same way you can can go into CVS and checkout just that jar. But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me. Eric -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:47 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar Apologies for treading on people's toes here, but I wanted to get the problem solved quickly, even if it causes a bad build etc. Making sure we're good licence-wise is crucial. Craig raised the issue on the PMC list that the email component had the activation.jar and the javamail.jar in the cvs repository. We're allowed to ship them in distributions, but not to offer them separately (correct me if that's wrong somebody?). Having them in CVS is effectively offering them separately. I've rm-r'd them on the cvs server and modified the build.xml to do the same thing the project.xml does; attempt to grab them from ibiblio and fail. I used rm -r as opposed to cvs remove as they'd still be available with cvs remove. Sorry for not just waiting for the main email committers to read Craig's email from this morning. Given the time of year I'd hate for it to turn out that the 2 or 3 people most likely to fix it are in the US and out late at thanksgiving dinners. Feel free to flame :) Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
Done. On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's fine. Can you also do the same trick in jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/libs as well? As I sent in my email to the PMC, I thought the reason those jars are not on ibiblio is that you can't redistribute them via a website. But having them in CVS would be akin to having them in a war file, correct? You can crack open a war file and download the jar the same way you can can go into CVS and checkout just that jar. But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me. Eric -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:47 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar Apologies for treading on people's toes here, but I wanted to get the problem solved quickly, even if it causes a bad build etc. Making sure we're good licence-wise is crucial. Craig raised the issue on the PMC list that the email component had the activation.jar and the javamail.jar in the cvs repository. We're allowed to ship them in distributions, but not to offer them separately (correct me if that's wrong somebody?). Having them in CVS is effectively offering them separately. I've rm-r'd them on the cvs server and modified the build.xml to do the same thing the project.xml does; attempt to grab them from ibiblio and fail. I used rm -r as opposed to cvs remove as they'd still be available with cvs remove. Sorry for not just waiting for the main email committers to read Craig's email from this morning. Given the time of year I'd hate for it to turn out that the 2 or 3 people most likely to fix it are in the US and out late at thanksgiving dinners. Feel free to flame :) Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me. If the Ant script had properties to define the source URLs for these two JARs, I could point them at my local copies. The license on the JARs in question allows them to be distributed as *part* of a larger package, so my building my own copy into the nightlies is fine ... the license also says you cannot make them available *separately*, which is why having them in CVS doesn't work. Would you guys mind if I hand patched the build.xml file to see if I can get that to work? Eric Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
We appreciate all the help we can get :-) -Corey On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:35:04 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me. If the Ant script had properties to define the source URLs for these two JARs, I could point them at my local copies. The license on the JARs in question allows them to be distributed as *part* of a larger package, so my building my own copy into the nightlies is fine ... the license also says you cannot make them available *separately*, which is why having them in CVS doesn't work. Would you guys mind if I hand patched the build.xml file to see if I can get that to work? Eric Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
