RE: [workflow] outstanding bugs

[Sharples, Colin]

 i'd probably be willing to take a look at the patches once 
 things are a little less hectic (which the way things have 
 been going might be quite a long while) but i suspect that 
 the best plan would be wait until after java one when 
 craig is going to have some more time.

Thanks, Robert, I appreciate the response. Of course, I do know the best way to become 
a committer is to keep on submitting stuff, so I might have a look at a component 
that's a bit more active ;-)

 i admire your dedication and if you could remind us again 
 once digester and validator have been released, that'd be 
 very much appreciated.

I'll do that. Incidentally, it's likely that the project I'm working on will have 
quite a bit of stuff that could be submitted back into workflow. Our first release is 
at the end of July, and after that I'll have a bit of time to look at harvesting some 
assets.

Colin Sharples
IBM IT Architect
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +64 21 402 085

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [workflow] outstanding bugs

[Sharples, Colin]

Well, if no-one else wants to do it, how do I get committer rights so that I can do it?

;-)

 -Original Message-
 From: Sharples, Colin 
 Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 10:31 a.m.
 To: Commons-Dev (E-mail)
 Subject: [workflow] outstanding bugs
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I have a few bugs outstanding on the Workflow component that 
 I would quite like to see fixed - I have supplied patches. 
 Craig is a very busy person, so I don't know if he has time 
 to look at those. Is there anyone else who can take a look at 
 them and apply the patches? The bug numbers are:
 
 26902
 26903
 28238
 
 Thanks.
 
 Colin Sharples
 IBM IT Architect
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Mobile: +64 21 402 085
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [workflow] outstanding bugs

[robert burrell donkin]

On 25 May 2004, at 21:28, Sharples, Colin wrote:
Well, if no-one else wants to do it, how do I get committer rights so 
that I can do it?

;-)
craig is very likely to be very busy until after java one but when he's 
travelling he'll drop in to see us from time to time :)

workflow is in the sandbox. for these components, the jakarta commons 
community is able to grant karma (upon request) for any existing apache 
committer but not committership (the jakarta pmc would be entitled - if 
you could persuade them - to make you a committer).

things are really, really busy here right now. the commons collections 
3.0 and log4j 1.3 release series are not binary compatible and rushing 
road to ensure that we can ship releases that can be used by those 
projects downstream without compatibility problems is the major 
priority right now. this means cutting four or more major releases.

i'd probably be willing to take a look at the patches once things are a 
little less hectic (which the way things have been going might be quite 
a long while) but i suspect that the best plan would be wait until 
after java one when craig is going to have some more time.

i admire your dedication and if you could remind us again once digester 
and validator have been released, that'd be very much appreciated.

- robert

-Original Message-
From: Sharples, Colin
Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 10:31 a.m.
To: Commons-Dev (E-mail)
Subject: [workflow] outstanding bugs
Hi,
I have a few bugs outstanding on the Workflow component that
I would quite like to see fixed - I have supplied patches.
Craig is a very busy person, so I don't know if he has time
to look at those. Is there anyone else who can take a look at
them and apply the patches? The bug numbers are:
26902
26903
28238
Thanks.
Colin Sharples
IBM IT Architect
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +64 21 402 085

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]