Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-26 Thread Oliver Heger
robert burrell donkin wrote:

>On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:44 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>  
>
>>P.S. Oliver isn't on the Jakarta "whoweare" page, although he was voted on
>>to the PMC in January.
>>
>>
>
>sounds like it's time for oliver to add himself...
>
>- robert
>
>  
>
Done. Thanks for pointing this out.

Oliver

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:44 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:

> P.S. Oliver isn't on the Jakarta "whoweare" page, although he was voted on
> to the PMC in January.

sounds like it's time for oliver to add himself...

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
Its now been 72+ hours since this vote was called and the vote has passed,
with the following people all voting +1 (and no other votes):

Robert Burrell Donkin (binding)
Niall Pemberton (binding)
Dion Gillard (binding)
Rahul Akolkar (binding)
Oliver Heger (binding)
Phil Steitz (binding)
Stephen Colebourne (binding)

I will cut the release in the next couple of days. Thanks to everyone who
participated with feedback and votes.

Niall

P.S. Oliver isn't on the Jakarta "whoweare" page, although he was voted on
to the PMC in January.

- Original Message - 
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 5:37 AM


> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator
1.3.0.
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
>
> - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> - corrected a problem generating the md5 checksums
> - sigs have been generated for this RC
> - ant build now automatically downloads dependencies (requires less setup)
> - "build.properties.sample" file included in source distro
> - release notes now point to local copy of changes-report.html (rather
than
> online)
> - source distro now unpacks to a different directory
>
> RC3 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/
>
> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/
>
> Release notes here:
>
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/changes-report.html
>
> Keys file is here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/validator/KEYS
>
> 
> [ ] +1  I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> 
>
> Niall



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Stephen Colebourne

Niall Pemberton wrote:


[X] +1  I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1  I do not support this release because...



Not sure whether you intended to include validator_2_0_0_proposal.dtd in 
the release?


Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Phil Steitz
+1

Phil

On 3/20/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
>
> - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> - corrected a problem generating the md5 checksums
> - sigs have been generated for this RC
> - ant build now automatically downloads dependencies (requires less setup)
> - "build.properties.sample" file included in source distro
> - release notes now point to local copy of changes-report.html (rather than
> online)
> - source distro now unpacks to a different directory
>
> RC3 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/
>
> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/
>
> Release notes here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/changes-report.html
>
> Keys file is here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/validator/KEYS
>
> 
> [ ] +1  I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> 
>
> Niall
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Sorry for the dely, was quite busy the last days. RC3 looks good to me,
there are no more problems with the tests. So here is my +1!

Oliver

Niall Pemberton wrote:

>So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
>it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
>Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
>
>If there are any other votes out there they would be v.welcome :-)
>
>Niall
>
>On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
>>
>>Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
>>
>>- corrected problems with "localized" tests
>>- corrected a problem generating the md5 checksums
>>- sigs have been generated for this RC
>>- ant build now automatically downloads dependencies (requires less setup)
>>- "build.properties.sample" file included in source distro
>>- release notes now point to local copy of changes-report.html (rather than
>>online)
>>- source distro now unpacks to a different directory
>>
>>RC3 is here:
>>http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/
>>
>>Site here:
>>http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/
>>
>>Release notes here:
>>http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/changes-report.html
>>
>>Keys file is here:
>>http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/validator/KEYS
>>
>>
>>[ ] +1  I support this release
>>[ ] +0
>>[ ] -0
>>[ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
>>
>>
>>Niall
>>
>>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.

>
> 
> [X] +1  I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> 
>

-Rahul


> Niall
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/23/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
> > it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
> > Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
> >
> 
>
> Best if that issue doesn't arise, IMO.

Yeah, better to extend the 72 and nudge for another vote. If we can't
get a 3 person vote for a released component it's something we should
be worrying about :)

In this case, it's probably just a time bit. I'm away from home until
tonight on weak bandwidth networks, so haven't had much chances to
check RCs.

Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
> it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
> Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
>


Best if that issue doesn't arise, IMO.


> If there are any other votes out there they would be v.welcome :-)
>


I intend to vote here, but will need close to the full 72 hours this time.

-Rahul


> Niall
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Dion Gillard
+1. Looks ok to me.

On 3/24/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
> it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
> Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
>
> If there are any other votes out there they would be v.welcome :-)
>
> Niall
>
> On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator
> 1.3.0.
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
> >
> > - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> > - corrected a problem generating the md5 checksums
> > - sigs have been generated for this RC
> > - ant build now automatically downloads dependencies (requires less
> setup)
> > - "build.properties.sample" file included in source distro
> > - release notes now point to local copy of changes-report.html (rather
> than
> > online)
> > - source distro now unpacks to a different directory
> >
> > RC3 is here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/
> >
> > Site here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/
> >
> > Release notes here:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/changes-report.html
> >
> > Keys file is here:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/validator/KEYS
> >
> > 
> > [ ] +1  I support this release
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -0
> > [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> > 
> >
> > Niall
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris


Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?

If there are any other votes out there they would be v.welcome :-)

Niall

On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
>
> - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> - corrected a problem generating the md5 checksums
> - sigs have been generated for this RC
> - ant build now automatically downloads dependencies (requires less setup)
> - "build.properties.sample" file included in source distro
> - release notes now point to local copy of changes-report.html (rather than
> online)
> - source distro now unpacks to a different directory
>
> RC3 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/
>
> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/
>
> Release notes here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/changes-report.html
>
> Keys file is here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/validator/KEYS
>
> 
> [ ] +1  I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> 
>
> Niall

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 from me btw :-)

On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> [ ] +1  I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> 
>
> Niall

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
Thanks for the feedback (and vote) Robert, comments inline...

On 3/21/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 05:37 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
> >
> > - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> > - corrected a problem generating the md5 checksums
> > - sigs have been generated for this RC
> > - ant build now automatically downloads dependencies (requires less setup)
> > - "build.properties.sample" file included in source distro
> > - release notes now point to local copy of changes-report.html (rather than
> > online)
> > - source distro now unpacks to a different directory
> >
> > RC3 is here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/
>
> the extra detached signatures for the md5 files had me worried for a
> minute 8-)
>
> > Site here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/
>
> a few minor nits:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/javascript/org/apache/commons/validator/javascript/index.html
>  contains # REFER TO NON-SPEC DOCUMENTATION HERE #

OK I've removed this, but I don't believe its worth generating a new RC for it.

> you have two checkstyle violations:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/checkstyle-report.html

Great, Validator 1.2.0 had 207 warnings and 68 errors! Sorry,
seriously though I plan to leave this unchanged. I can't change the
method signatures just for checkstyle - but I want these things
highlighted for anything new.

> probably want to exclude tests from simian analysis

Good idea, I've added the appropriate property to project.properties to do so.

> > Release notes here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/changes-report.html
>
> i'm not very keen on this style of release notes: IMHO users expect to
> be able to read release notes in the download. i'd prefer a relative
> reference to the copy in the documentation

There is a copy in the binary distro and it includes a
RELEASE-NOTES.html in the root directory that has a relative reference
to the changes-report.html

> i'd like the above address but none are blockers for me so
>
> 
> > [X] +1  I support this release
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -0
> > [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> > 
>
> - robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.3.0 based on RC3

2006-03-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 05:37 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
> 
> Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
> 
> - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> - corrected a problem generating the md5 checksums
> - sigs have been generated for this RC
> - ant build now automatically downloads dependencies (requires less setup)
> - "build.properties.sample" file included in source distro
> - release notes now point to local copy of changes-report.html (rather than
> online)
> - source distro now unpacks to a different directory
> 
> RC3 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/

the extra detached signatures for the md5 files had me worried for a
minute 8-)

> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/

a few minor nits:

http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/javascript/org/apache/commons/validator/javascript/index.html
 contains # REFER TO NON-SPEC DOCUMENTATION HERE #

you have two checkstyle violations:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/checkstyle-report.html

probably want to exclude tests from simian analysis

> Release notes here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-validator-1.3.0-rc3/site/changes-report.html

i'm not very keen on this style of release notes: IMHO users expect to
be able to read release notes in the download. i'd prefer a relative
reference to the copy in the documentation

i'd like the above address but none are blockers for me so


> [X] +1  I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> 

- robert


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part