RE: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-27 Thread Eric Pugh
I did some fixes to the Maven Ant plugin to deal better with overrides.
I'll take what you sort out in build.xml and then see if I can support it in
the Maven Ant plugin.  As long as Email is built primarily by Maven, we will
always have problems keeping the Ant script up to date without automation
(or lots of attention to detail!).

Thanks for the assist..

Eric

> -Original Message-
> From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 8:05 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
>
>
> We appreciate all the help we can get :-)
>
> -Corey
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:35:04 -0800, Craig McClanahan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > But, it's not really a big deal.  It's only a problem for the
> nightly build
> > > based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should
> be as they are
> > > installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me.
> >
> > If the Ant script had properties to define the source URLs for these
> > two JARs, I could point them at my local copies.  The license on the
> > JARs in question allows them to be distributed as *part* of a larger
> > package, so my building my own copy into the nightlies is fine ... the
> > license also says you cannot make them available *separately*, which
> > is why having them in CVS doesn't work.
> >
> > Would you guys mind if I hand patched the build.xml file to see if I
> > can get that to work?
> >
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Corey Scott
We appreciate all the help we can get :-)

-Corey


On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:35:04 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > But, it's not really a big deal.  It's only a problem for the nightly build
> > based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are
> > installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me.
> 
> If the Ant script had properties to define the source URLs for these
> two JARs, I could point them at my local copies.  The license on the
> JARs in question allows them to be distributed as *part* of a larger
> package, so my building my own copy into the nightlies is fine ... the
> license also says you cannot make them available *separately*, which
> is why having them in CVS doesn't work.
> 
> Would you guys mind if I hand patched the build.xml file to see if I
> can get that to work?
> 
> >
> > Eric
> >
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> But, it's not really a big deal.  It's only a problem for the nightly build
> based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are
> installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me.

If the Ant script had properties to define the source URLs for these
two JARs, I could point them at my local copies.  The license on the
JARs in question allows them to be distributed as *part* of a larger
package, so my building my own copy into the nightlies is fine ... the
license also says you cannot make them available *separately*, which
is why having them in CVS doesn't work.

Would you guys mind if I hand patched the build.xml file to see if I
can get that to work?

> 
> Eric
> 

Craig

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Henri Yandell
Done.


On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's fine.   Can you also do the same trick in
> jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/libs as well?   As I sent in my email to the
> PMC, I thought the reason those jars are not on ibiblio is that you can't
> redistribute them via a website.  But having them in CVS would be akin to
> having them in a war file, correct?  You can crack open a war file and
> download the jar the same way you can can go into CVS and checkout just that
> jar.
> 
> But, it's not really a big deal.  It's only a problem for the nightly build
> based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are
> installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:47 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
> >
> >
> > Apologies for treading on people's toes here, but I wanted to get the
> > problem solved quickly, even if it causes a bad build etc. Making sure
> > we're good licence-wise is crucial.
> >
> > Craig raised the issue on the PMC list that the email component had
> > the activation.jar and the javamail.jar in the cvs repository. We're
> > allowed to ship them in distributions, but not to offer them
> > separately (correct me if that's wrong somebody?). Having them in CVS
> > is effectively offering them separately.
> >
> > I've rm-r'd them on the cvs server and modified the build.xml to do
> > the same thing the project.xml does; attempt to grab them from ibiblio
> > and fail. I used rm -r as opposed to cvs remove as they'd still be
> > available with cvs remove.
> >
> > Sorry for not just waiting for the main email committers to read
> > Craig's email from this morning. Given the time of year I'd hate for
> > it to turn out that the 2 or 3 people most likely to fix it are in the
> > US and out late at thanksgiving dinners.
> >
> > Feel free to flame :)
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Eric Pugh
It's fine.   Can you also do the same trick in
jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/libs as well?   As I sent in my email to the
PMC, I thought the reason those jars are not on ibiblio is that you can't
redistribute them via a website.  But having them in CVS would be akin to
having them in a war file, correct?  You can crack open a war file and
download the jar the same way you can can go into CVS and checkout just that
jar.

But, it's not really a big deal.  It's only a problem for the nightly build
based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are
installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me.

Eric

> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:47 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
>
>
> Apologies for treading on people's toes here, but I wanted to get the
> problem solved quickly, even if it causes a bad build etc. Making sure
> we're good licence-wise is crucial.
>
> Craig raised the issue on the PMC list that the email component had
> the activation.jar and the javamail.jar in the cvs repository. We're
> allowed to ship them in distributions, but not to offer them
> separately (correct me if that's wrong somebody?). Having them in CVS
> is effectively offering them separately.
>
> I've rm-r'd them on the cvs server and modified the build.xml to do
> the same thing the project.xml does; attempt to grab them from ibiblio
> and fail. I used rm -r as opposed to cvs remove as they'd still be
> available with cvs remove.
>
> Sorry for not just waiting for the main email committers to read
> Craig's email from this morning. Given the time of year I'd hate for
> it to turn out that the 2 or 3 people most likely to fix it are in the
> US and out late at thanksgiving dinners.
>
> Feel free to flame :)
>
> Hen
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]