DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22941] - Socket streams are closed in the incorrect order.

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941

Socket streams are closed in the incorrect order.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22941] - Socket streams are closed in the incorrect order.

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941

Socket streams are closed in the incorrect order.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||commons-httpclient-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22968] New: - HttpConnection.isResponseAvailable() calls setSoTimeout() but does not catch IOException

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22968.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22968

HttpConnection.isResponseAvailable() calls setSoTimeout() but does not catch 
IOException

   Summary: HttpConnection.isResponseAvailable() calls
setSoTimeout() but does not catch IOException
   Product: Commons
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: Other
 Component: HttpClient
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


HttpConnection.isResponseAvailable() can throw an IOException when setting the
soTimeout but should probably just return false in this case.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10626848512r=1w=2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22969] New: - return value of PostMethod#removeParameter

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969

return value of PostMethod#removeParameter

   Summary: return value of PostMethod#removeParameter
   Product: Commons
   Version: 2.0 Final
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: Other
 Component: HttpClient
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


HttpClient2.0-rc1

About 
public boolean removeParameter(String paramName)
 throws IllegalArgumentException
method.

-
PostMethod method = new PostMethod(uri);
method.addParameter(name, Matsui Hideki);
boolean b;
b = method.removeParameter(name); // returns true.
b = method.removeParameter(); // returns true. why??? 
---

sorry for my poor english.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22628] - RFE: Implement HTTP 1.1 Pipelining

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22628.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22628

RFE: Implement HTTP 1.1 Pipelining

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|Other   |Low
   Target Milestone|--- |3.0 Final
Version|3.0 Final   |2.0 Beta 2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22941] - Socket streams are closed in the incorrect order.

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941

Socket streams are closed in the incorrect order.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |2.0 Final
Version|unspecified |2.0 Beta 1



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-09-07 18:10 ---
Looks fine to me. 

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22969] - return value of PostMethod#removeParameter

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969

return value of PostMethod#removeParameter

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Priority|Other   |Low
   Target Milestone|--- |2.0 Final



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-09-07 18:44 ---
Hirai,
This is clearly a bug. Thanks for tracking it down.

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22969] - return value of PostMethod#removeParameter

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969

return value of PostMethod#removeParameter





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-09-07 18:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=8089)
Patch

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22926] - [patch] Support for digest auth MD5-sess

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22926.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22926

[patch] Support for digest auth MD5-sess





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-09-07 18:56 ---
I believe the patch is good to be committed. The question remains, though, if
the patch should be applied to HEAD only or to 2.0 branch and HEAD. Opinions?

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22970] - PostMethod#setParameter

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22970.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22970

PostMethod#setParameter





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-09-07 19:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=8090)
Patch

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22655] - Authentication does not respond to stale nonce

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655

Authentication does not respond to stale nonce

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-09-08 02:03 ---
Patch applied.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22940] - gzip content-encoding support

2003-09-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22940.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22940

gzip content-encoding support





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-09-08 02:11 ---
Oleg, I agree.  HttpClient should only handle transfer encodings.  Content
encodings are the business of the user.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]