DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-30 21:14 ---
Patch committed.

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-30 19:29 ---
If nobody complains loudly I'll commit this patch tonight.

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-30 12:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=7581)
HTTP version patch (take 3)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-30 05:06 ---
This looks very good!  I have one (very) minor suggestion:  In
EntityEnclosingMethod, change this:
 "Chunked transfer encoding not allowed for HTTP/1.0");
to this:
 "Chunked transfer encoding not allowed for " +
 getHttpVersion());

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-25 16:05 ---
I don't know of a good reason to hash HttpVersions either. I think it is just
good practice to override equals() and hashCode() together.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-25 15:36 ---
I can hardly imagine that one would want to put instances of HttpVersion class 
into a hash map, but, of course, I see no harm in having a hashCode() 
implementation. What do you think it can be useful for?

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-25 15:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=7515)
HTTP version patch (take 2)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-25 13:33 ---
Oleg,

Very nice.  I think this is a clean solution to the problem.  I have a few comments:

 - HttpVersion.parse() no longer handles the http status of "HTTP". Though this
is an obviously non-standard value it is something that we intentionally added
support for.
 - HttpVersion should implement hashCode().
 - HttpVersion.equals(Object) does the following test:

if ((obj != null) && (obj instanceof HttpVersion))

  Though this is not an error the test for null is not necessary as instanceof
already handles this case.


Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-24 15:39 ---
It's just a small step toward improving the HTTP protocol versioning in 
HttpClient. Folks, let me know what you think. 

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-24 15:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=7493)
HTTP version patch (take 1)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10791] - HTTP Version configuration and tracking

2003-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10791

HTTP Version configuration and tracking

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||commons-httpclient-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|commons-httpclient- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-07-21 13:26 ---
I'll be working on this one.

Oleg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]