Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list ( was RE: infrastructure@ missing from eyebrowse )
Too bad, the community@ list advocated it and should therefore maintain it. You're welcome to call a vote to invite him (here's my +1) -aaron On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 06:06 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well. He's not a committer. Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: Folks, Open Closedness of the ASF This is a very useful and valuable discussion - but this is not the right place. I'd really encourage you folks to pick up the thread again on community@ - which is exactly for this type of dilemma's and ethics. I'll promise I'll add a few words of my own when it pops up there. But for this list it is out of scope. Thanks, Dw
Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list ( was RE: infrastructure@ missing from eyebrowse )
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well. He's not a committer. My memory can be very bad, but I believe we said community@ could also be 'by invitation'. Given Tim's pertinent remarks and apparent genuine interest in our operations, we could allow him on the community list. /Steven -- Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org
