RE: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Carsten
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Hmmm. I looked at the datestamp of the original vote message and it looked like I was under the 78 hour window for voting. But you are correct, it doesn't matter since I am just affirming the result. I thought it was 72 hrs ? ;-) Yeah, right, my mistake. 3 days = 72 hours not 78 :) I can't even count anymore. -- Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Glenn Nielsen wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Sorry Glenn, the vote was closed. But since the result was exactly what you wanted I don't think this upsets you :) -- Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Sorry Glenn, the vote was closed. But since the result was exactly what you wanted I don't think this upsets you :) Hmmm. I looked at the datestamp of the original vote message and it looked like I was under the 78 hour window for voting. But you are correct, it doesn't matter since I am just affirming the result. Glenn
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Hmmm. I looked at the datestamp of the original vote message and it looked like I was under the 78 hour window for voting. But you are correct, it doesn't matter since I am just affirming the result. I thought it was 72 hrs ? ;-) Glenn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Openness
I agree with Stefan here. I think we need the transparency, but we want to avoid the noise of too many people exposing their ideas. There are better forums for them to express this. We need to keep this list focused on what matters to us. On Thursday, Oct 31, 2002, at 02:51 US/Pacific, Stefan Bodewig wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Regards, -- Ovidiu Predescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://webweavertech.com/ovidiu/weblog/
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
Re: [VOTE] Openness
I wasn't trying to vote twice, but I thought the first attempt from this email address would have been rejected. Sorry! Glyn Normington http://cvs.apache.org/~glyn
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [X] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Ilene. --
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Torsten Curdt wrote: [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [X] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only ...OR THOSE INVITED Ditto. Vadim -- Torsten
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Hey all, --- Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: [snip] VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only ...OR THOSE INVITED Ditto. Actually, specifying invitees as a qualification to the -1 may not be necessary, if each invitee will need to be voted in individually anyway. Only if invitees may be added without a vote do we need to resolve the matter, and that's probably worthy of a specific second vote if -1 proves the majority opinion. Just pointing out that you probably needn't worry about this detail. IMO we should wait for the -1 result, and then determine the terms by which we will add invitees. - Morgan = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
Re: [VOTE] Openness
10/30/2002 12:19:03 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [x] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Best regards Rainer Klute Rainer Klute IT-Consulting GmbH Dipl.-Inform. Rainer Klute E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Körner Grund 24 Telefon: +49 172 2324824 D-44143 Dortmund Telefax: +49 231 5349423
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [X] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:19:03PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [X] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : ManageSoft GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse ;$,_/\ :' 60327 Frankfurt Germany ' /( \_' . :
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 12:19 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [x] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Diana
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only plus invited ones. Giacomo
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it private -sc - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only -sc I have this feeling that it would be best to use community@ as a tool to help our *existing* community grow towards a more common understanding first, before we start worrying about trying to grow the size of our community. And as a side note, could folks be a little more selective in including text in replys/forwards? Please try to only forward the directly relevant parts of previous emails, instead of including the whole previous email. - Shane aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ X ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only - o - Please, place your vote even if you already voted in the previous poll. We'll reset the clock and give 78 hours for the vote. I volunteer to count the retults and post them here.
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [x] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone Thanks in advance and sorry for the double poll noise. No problem. /Steven -- Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [X] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers __OR THOSE INVITED__ -- Daniel Rall dlr@finemaltcoding.com
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [x] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [X] 0 don't know/don't care - Sam Ruby
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 10:19 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
RE: [VOTE] Openness
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 10:19 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [X] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Scott
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers Also: On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 12:26, Daniel Rall wrote: __OR THOSE INVITED__ That is also my preference, but to avoid confusion my vote on 2 can be counted as a -1
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [X] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only -- Stephen J. McConnell OSM SARL digital products for a global economy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
RE: [VOTE] Openness
I agree: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Hmm.. re-submit someone else's ballot paper, thats the cut'n'paste generation for you. :) d.
Re: [VOTE] Openness
* Stefano Mazzocchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [X] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only -Thom
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [X] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Costin
RE: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Sander
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Please, allow me to restart the voting in order to make it easier to reach some consensus since it's hard to interpret the results of the previous one. VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [x] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP Fingerprint: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Re: [VOTE] Openness
* Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [x] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [x] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only + invited... nd -- s s^saoaaaoaaoaaaom a alataa aaoat a a a maoaa a laoata a oia a o a m a o alaoooat aaool aaoaa matooololaaatoto aaa o a o ms;s;\s;s;g;y;s;:;s;y#mailto: # \51/\134\137| http://www.perlig.de #;print;# [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Openness
--- James Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you changing the vote here? I would like to vote but you have changed the direction of this vote, in a way that's really wierd. Currently, as i understand it, the last vote favored opening the list to invited experts, with a public archive. How would I vote that here? -- james I think you want to vote +1 on the first issue and -1 on the second issue, with a subsequent vote later (if it's even necessary) to extend access to invited guests. The last vote was essentially a free-for-all write-in with no clear result IMO. You interpreted the last vote as allowing a public archive, but one could easily assert that the option 3, no public archive, won because it received the most votes. The contrary interpretation is that the public archive opinion won because options 1 and 2 both allow an archive and received more combined votes than option 3. It was an unclear format. - Morgan = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only After all, that was the charter of the list to begin with. If you want something different, try Yahoo Groups. -- Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kenya.rcbowen.com/
RE: [VOTE] Openness
Title: RE: [VOTE] Openness VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private +1 - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [X] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only +1 - o -
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it private - o - VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only cheers, erik
RE: [VOTE] Openness
--On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:19 PM +0100 Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only +1
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [x] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only -Kurt
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only and invitees (contributors). Though I hesitate to say so, I need to make this perfectly clear. I will unsubscribe from this list if non-contributors join. I am not going to take time away from my life for people who haven't earned the right to be in this community. Roy
Re: [VOTE] Openness
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:19, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [+1] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [+1] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
Re: [VOTE] Openness
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only -- Elena Litani
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only - Leo
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only -John K
