Re: Some light ahead...

2007-04-25 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 01:51:45 Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
 Oh and Imre Kaloz gets a freed phone, too. Thanks for being the first to
 tell us about Atheros. We're almost for sure going to use their AR6K
 chipset in our next product.

I just have to ask: is there any broad schedule / specs for the P1.5 phone 
already?


pgpazAnfGwp8H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Some light ahead...

2007-04-25 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 08:26 +0200, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
 On Wednesday 25 April 2007 01:51:45 Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
  Oh and Imre Kaloz gets a freed phone, too. Thanks for being the
 first to
  tell us about Atheros. We're almost for sure going to use their AR6K
  chipset in our next product.
 
 I just have to ask: is there any broad schedule / specs for the P1.5
 phone 
 already? 

Not yet. We're still working on the schematics. When things get
finalized I'll make another announcement. 

-Sean


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Some light ahead...

2007-04-25 Thread Clayton Jones

Thank you so much for the update!
I was frantically searching for HW since i heard it would be available
in March and thought i was missing out.
Glad to know i didn't miss the boat!
This is also my first post to the list - i've been reading as many as
i can since joining about a week ago.
Also hoping to be of service to the community!

I skimmed a thread regarding GPS in the phone - I haven't looked up
the datasheet for the chipset being used, but I know many GPS chips
spout NMEA-183 messages.  I have some old C routines i wrote about 10
yrs ago for parsing NMEA-183 protocol - if anybody thinks they'd be of
use i can dust 'em off and submit them.

Thanks again for setting up such a fantastic project!

--clayton


On 4/24/07, Sean Moss-Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dear Community,

We owe you all an update as to our status. Here it goes...

Last week we finished 200 devices. Of these about 50 seem to have some
problems but the rest are functionally complete, tested, and ready to
go. We know the source of the problems for the 50 that failed and this
is already corrected. This is great news because it means we can finally
start to move out of engineering sample mode and into real production!

These first 150 (or so) devices will go to phase 0 developers and our
internal / external developers -- of which many still don't even have
phones!

Oh and Imre Kaloz gets a freed phone, too. Thanks for being the first to
tell us about Atheros. We're almost for sure going to use their AR6K
chipset in our next product.

We must forewarn you all that we're having some supply issues with our
2.8 VGA LCM. Our vendor has had more than their fair share of troubles
moving this LCM into mass production. We have some in stock now. But
this might be the major bottleneck moving forward. There are only a few
companies currently making LCMs of this size and resolution.

Finally, we've already begun moving production into one of our factories
in mainland China. There are two runs scheduled now: May 10th and May
20th. We're going to take those runs a bit slow just to make sure the
quality is high. And then starting in June, things can run full speed.

Thanks again for your continued support and patience. The light at the
end of the tunnel is getting a little brighter :-)

Sincerely,

The Core Team



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Some light ahead...

2007-04-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11000 March 1977, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:

 We owe you all an update as to our status. Here it goes...

Great news, thanks.

-- 
bye Joerg
_DeadBull_ ohne speicher, tastatur, mouse, pladde, monitor, also nur die
Hardware...


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Audio Jack 2.5 mm

2007-04-25 Thread t3st3r

Vladimi'r Lapa'c(ek wrote:

Interesting thing to consider is how many people would like to use the
headset and how many would it use for playing music. 
Wired connection usually preferred by those who listens to music.Others 
are often using bluetooth since it is more convenient (no wires).Usually 
I can see people with wired headsets only if
1)Wired headset was supplied with device by vendor and owner is too lazy 
to buy something else.
2)or owner likes music, bluetooth is not an option here due to lack of 
a2dp support by devices and quite low quality of headsets.


As for me, I will prefer to listen to music on my phone (I'm already do 
and will do in future, that's just convenient).And yes, I will have 
headache with buying 2.5 to 3.5 mm jack converter since handsets with 
2.5 mm jack are pretty low-quality and only suitable for calls (and for 
just calls, bluetooth is more convenient option).



My estimate is
much bigger for the second, but it may be pretty much skewed.

Using an adapter might be an option but not for mainstream (I know,
the phone is not mainstream).
These adapters are popular up to some degree due to some portable 
devices using 2.5 mm jacks, but still this adds some headache with 
finding such adapter.That's not fair, at least for me.


P.S. but 3.5 mm sockets are bigger than 2.5 mm ones - this may be an 
issue for small portable devices.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Audio Jack 2.5 mm

2007-04-25 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:21:05 t3st3r wrote:
 These adapters are popular up to some degree due to some portable
 devices using 2.5 mm jacks, but still this adds some headache with
 finding such adapter.That's not fair, at least for me.

You mean like the trouble of going to ebay and order one? From what I 
understand, Motorola V360 adapters will work (which might well be true, they 
look identical at least) and those are really cheap and widely available.


pgpp1gwzOBqpl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

2007-04-25 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Florent THIERY writes:
 If you're about Macromedia Flash (er, now Adobe), isn't it closed
 source?

The neo has a closed source real time OS running the GSM part...

OS?  It's been said pretty consistently that it's a user-mode daemon.
Still one more piece of closed source software than I like to see, but
not an OS.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


RE: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

2007-04-25 Thread Dean Collins
I think Florent's point is that your argument is moot; You can rant an
rave all you want but at the end of the day functionality is more
important than all open source.

Likewise there are going to be commercial applications developed on this
handset as it's not fairy land open source world but a commercial
project being developed here.

 

I think the less religious arguments here the better this project will
beif you don't like it go and write your own gsm stack and then
release it for the community to use.

 

Regards,

Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph
+61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).

  http://click.mexuar.com/webuser/click/7/userurl/Cognation  
http://click.mexuar.com/webuser/nojs/7/userurl/Cognation 
 

 

 -Original Message-

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Pfeiffer

 Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2007 10:24 AM

 To: community@lists.openmoko.org

 Subject: Re: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

 

 Florent THIERY writes:

  If you're about Macromedia Flash (er, now Adobe), isn't it closed

  source?

 

 The neo has a closed source real time OS running the GSM part...

 

 OS?  It's been said pretty consistently that it's a user-mode daemon.

 Still one more piece of closed source software than I like to see, but

 not an OS.

 

 ___

 OpenMoko community mailing list

 community@lists.openmoko.org

 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



image001.gif
Description: image001.gif
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

2007-04-25 Thread Mikko J Rauhala
On ke, 2007-04-25 at 08:23 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
 Florent THIERY writes:
  If you're about Macromedia Flash (er, now Adobe), isn't it closed
  source?
 
 The neo has a closed source real time OS running the GSM part...
 
 OS?  It's been said pretty consistently that it's a user-mode daemon.

He's talking GSM, not GPS. The GSM chip indeed has its own proprietary
OS. However, that's IMAO a special case and very different from any
user-mode software on the SOC side. We want an open GNU/Linux system on
this phone. It would be _nice_ to have an open GSM system as well, but
not possible at this point.

The GSM part is nicely encapsulated as an integrated peripheral
providing a standard API. As such it's not of as much openness interest
to the application developers and users as the base GNU/Linux OS with
its application libraries is.

Heck, apparently even Stallman only had a problem with the GPS plugin.

-- 
Mikko J Rauhala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Helsinki


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

2007-04-25 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia środa, 25 kwietnia 2007, Joe Pfeiffer napisał:
 The neo has a closed source real time OS running the GSM part...

 OS?  It's been said pretty consistently that it's a user-mode daemon.
 Still one more piece of closed source software than I like to see, but
 not an OS.

Closed source daemon will be for GPS. GSM modem has own OS inside 
(firmware) which is closed and will not open due to NDA.

-- 
JID: hrw-jabber.org
OpenEmbedded developer/consultant

  Cats are like people: the females are the prickly ones
  and the males are good-natured idiots. 



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

2007-04-25 Thread Dmitri Hrapof

Dean Collins пишет:


but at the end of the day functionality is more important than all 
open source.


No it's not; why am I waiting for this device instead of buying Windows 
one?


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Fwd: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

2007-04-25 Thread J F

-- Forwarded message --
From: J F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 24, 2007 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?
To: t3st3r [EMAIL PROTECTED]





On 24/4/07 8:23 pm, t3st3r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Florent THIERY wrote:

Disclaimer: in no way I'm any official or whatever - I'm just a
subscriber of this list like you.All following thing is just a my own
private opinition.Other recipients or officials may feel this in
slightly another way.

As we can see, the neo and the chumby have a lot in common, be it
ideas, hardware specs or even leaders ;)

Yes, it uses flash7 for widgets. Which has'nt even been considered in
the openmoko case... But what if the two projects shared the widget
aspect?

If you're about Macromedia Flash (er, now Adobe), isn't it closed
source?


There's gnash - www.gnashdev.org



I'm stated my point of view.Personally, I will never buy open phone
where UI toolkit is heavily based on closed source thing and requiring
me to buy proprietary Adobe app to create\change UI parts.That's hardly
in open source spirit.


I do believe there are open source apps to create flash files, however, I'm
no expert on the subject and am too lazy to hunt for links right now :p
maybe someone who's had experience on this side of things could say
something on their quality.


Also, flash based UIs I seen while looking good
are quite slow and jerky even on powerful (and power consuming) desktop
machines so they're hardly usable.Of course this is my own private
opinition and it is safe to ignore it.



There are some youtube vids of the prototype chumby in action where it
doesn't look too sluggish - it has similar specs to the p1 fic1973, however
it is running an adobe closed source flash player that may be faster than
gnash.

I personally like the idea of having a ui that is designable by people who
work on websites who have more design skills than the average c haxxor...
Combined with an onboard webserver, one could do some fun things like
transplant the phone's ui to whatever full computer you have handy.

It would be fun to run some chumby things on the fic but I would imagine
*JUST* having a flash ui might be limiting for some projects - as a musician
I would dread using a flash metronome, it would never have the timing of
gtick.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


--

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Some light ahead...

2007-04-25 Thread Jim Thompson

Duncan Hudson wrote:

Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:

Finally, we've already begun moving production into one of our factories
in mainland China. There are two runs scheduled now: May 10th and May
20th. We're going to take those runs a bit slow just to make sure the
quality is high. And then starting in June, things can run full speed.   
I'm as anxious as anyone to get my hands on one of these, but it just 
concerns me that the date has slipped again.  With each slip the 
competition gets closer and closer.  Openmoko has been compared, 
favorably, by many sources to the iPhone - and it was originally 
scheduled to ship months before that device.  Now we're talking about 
shipping after the iPhone, so the bar that you have to clear will have 
been raised considerably.


1) the Openmoko-for-customers is slated for 9/11/07, so it was going to 
ship after the Q207 date for the iPhone in any case.


2) the iPhone may slip too.

Its all the rumor in the Apple world these days.  We already know that 
Apple has slipped its next OS release (10.5) because it put some large 
number of its OS folks on the iPhone project, in order to get it out the 
door.


Most of us understand that adding people to a slipping project typically 
makes it slip harder.


3) the iPhone is being sold (in the US) through ATT/Cingular's 
channels, which are deep and wide.  Getting a consumer to the iPhone 
will be easy.  Getting that same individual to an OpenMoko phone will be 
much more difficult.


4) Relax... you're not going to be able to add features to an iPhone.




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Widgets: Openmoko/Chumby transproject?

2007-04-25 Thread Jesse Ross
I do believe there are open source apps to create flash files,  
however, I'm
no expert on the subject and am too lazy to hunt for links right  
now :p

maybe someone who's had experience on this side of things could say
something on their quality.


I _am_ a Flash designer/developer, and there are some very nice tools  
out there for doing Flash development in an open source way. There  
really is no equivalent for the visual-design portion of the Flash  
editing application, but MTASC is a Flash compiler that is very, very  
nice.


http://www.mtasc.org/

There is also a web site called Open Source Flash that lists similar  
open source projects useful for creating Flash content:


http://osflash.org/


Also, flash based UIs I seen while looking good
are quite slow and jerky even on powerful (and power consuming)  
desktop

machines so they're hardly usable.Of course this is my own private
opinition and it is safe to ignore it.


It depends on the designer/developer. Just as there are many, many  
bad C/C++ applications, and many, many bad HTML sites, there are  
many, many bad Flash interfaces. But, there will always be some  
really amazing, responsive examples of Flash interfaces, done by  
people who understand the limitations of the technology and ways  
around those limitations.



There are some youtube vids of the prototype chumby in action where it
doesn't look too sluggish - it has similar specs to the p1 fic1973,  
however
it is running an adobe closed source flash player that may be  
faster than

gnash.


This is possibly true. I did talk to the lead developer of Gnash a  
few months back, however, and he said that they did recently get  
Gnash to play YouTube videos. So, I'm guessing it's not too terribly  
slow (I haven't checked the progress on it lately).


I personally like the idea of having a ui that is designable by  
people who
work on websites who have more design skills than the average c  
haxxor...

Combined with an onboard webserver, one could do some fun things like
transplant the phone's ui to whatever full computer you have handy.


It opens up the phone to a whole different realm of developers, and  
that, in my opinion, is the best aspect of getting something like  
Gnash/Flash on the phone.


It would be fun to run some chumby things on the fic but I would  
imagine
*JUST* having a flash ui might be limiting for some projects - as a  
musician
I would dread using a flash metronome, it would never have the  
timing of

gtick.


As a Flash developer, even I wouldn't want that. Options are good,  
especially considering the open nature of the phone.


J.



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Audio Jack 2.5 mm

2007-04-25 Thread Don Walker




High quality
headsets designed for listening to music on cell phones are already
available with 4-pole 2.5mm jacks. Take a look at Sennheiser
(what I use). I'm sure there are others. 

http://www.sennheisercommunications.com/comm/icm_eng.nsf/root/products_mobile_mobile_music

Don

Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:

  t3st3r [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
  
I will have headache with buying 2.5 to 3.5 mm jack converter since
handsets with 2.5 mm jack are pretty low-quality and only suitable
for calls ...

  
  
Agreed.

Etymotic (http://www.etymotic.com/) makes a great set of very high
fidelity headsets, but the stereo ones are all 3.5mm.  The 2.5mm one
is only monophonic, so it is pretty useless for listening to one's
music.  (They do make phone calls sound great though!)

I've hoping that the combined stereo + microphone 2.5mm jack will
catch on and we'll eventually be able to buy high-quality combined
phone/stereo headsets.

-wolfgang
  





___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community