Re: cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-10 Thread David Vermeille
2010/7/4 Tha_Man 

>
> Hi again,
> I couldn't resist to do some more testing, so I copied my QtMoko SDcard
> installation to NAND. QtMoko from NAND boots fine in most cases (see
> overview), it's suspend and resume that fails when overclocked. However,
> suspend and resume works fine with the original NAND U-boot and your
> default
> clocked U-boot. I've flashed the overclocked images exactly as you posted
> and flashed u-boot_env.in as well, no errors were reported during
> flashing.
> Here's an overview:
>
> Tested under QtMoko v24, using different u-boot images flashed in NAND:
> + u-boot-gta02v5-1.3.1: works fine
> + u-boot.udfu_400_100_1.7: works fine
> - u-boot.udfu_450_112_1.65_1.9: won't boot (hangs on 'Starting kernel...')
> - u-boot.udfu_450_112_1.7_1.9_sdmax: won't boot (hangs on 'Starting
> kernel...')
> * u-boot.udfu_500_83_1.7: fails to resume after suspend
> * u-boot.udfu_500_83_1.7_1.8_CLK2: fails to resume after suspend
> * u-boot.udfu_533_88_1.7: fails to resume after suspend
> * u-boot.udfu_533_88_1.7_1.8_CLK2: fails to resume after suspend
>
> So most u-boot images boot fine with QtMoko v24 and report the correct
> speeds, but my phone doesn't wake up after suspend with any of the
> overclocked images; I have to remove the battery to be able to boot again.
> Even the 450Mhz-images you reported as 'working under qtmoko' fail with me,
> but I'm not sure if you tested suspend and resume. I'm using the default
> v24-kernel, based on 2.6.29 I believe.
>
> I hope my tests are of any help, if I need to test something else, please
> let me know.
>
> Cheers,
> Tha_Man
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/cpu-reclocking-to-500Mhz-overclocking-to-533Mhz-performance-tests-and-bootloader-images-tp5242777p5253190.html
> Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>

Hi,

I'm using QtMoko on SD from a long time and wanted to give these uboot
versions (500 and 533) a try. I kept my uboot env because yours doesn't seem
to add any new parameters.

They worked well but I have the same problems as Tha_Man : my FR doesn't
resume after suspend.

Back to your 400 uboot, the same QtMoko (same partitions and uboot env)
suspends and resumes well.

SHR-U suffers from the same symptoms.

I hope you'll be able to track and solve this problem because FR is really
faster at 500 or 533 Mhz and that's great.

--
David
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-10 Thread Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 19:19, David Vermeille  wrote:
>
>
> 2010/7/4 Tha_Man 
>>
>> Hi again,
>> I couldn't resist to do some more testing, so I copied my QtMoko SDcard
>> installation to NAND. QtMoko from NAND boots fine in most cases (see
>> overview), it's suspend and resume that fails when overclocked. However,
>> suspend and resume works fine with the original NAND U-boot and your
>> default
>> clocked U-boot. I've flashed the overclocked images exactly as you posted
>> and flashed u-boot_env.in as well, no errors were reported during
>> flashing.
>> Here's an overview:
>>
>> Tested under QtMoko v24, using different u-boot images flashed in NAND:
>> + u-boot-gta02v5-1.3.1: works fine
>> + u-boot.udfu_400_100_1.7: works fine
>> - u-boot.udfu_450_112_1.65_1.9: won't boot (hangs on 'Starting kernel...')
>> - u-boot.udfu_450_112_1.7_1.9_sdmax: won't boot (hangs on 'Starting
>> kernel...')
>> * u-boot.udfu_500_83_1.7: fails to resume after suspend
>> * u-boot.udfu_500_83_1.7_1.8_CLK2: fails to resume after suspend
>> * u-boot.udfu_533_88_1.7: fails to resume after suspend
>> * u-boot.udfu_533_88_1.7_1.8_CLK2: fails to resume after suspend
>>
>> So most u-boot images boot fine with QtMoko v24 and report the correct
>> speeds, but my phone doesn't wake up after suspend with any of the
>> overclocked images; I have to remove the battery to be able to boot again.
>> Even the 450Mhz-images you reported as 'working under qtmoko' fail with
>> me,
>> but I'm not sure if you tested suspend and resume. I'm using the default
>> v24-kernel, based on 2.6.29 I believe.
>>
>> I hope my tests are of any help, if I need to test something else, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tha_Man
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/cpu-reclocking-to-500Mhz-overclocking-to-533Mhz-performance-tests-and-bootloader-images-tp5242777p5253190.html
>> Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ___
>> Openmoko community mailing list
>> community@lists.openmoko.org
>> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using QtMoko on SD from a long time and wanted to give these uboot
> versions (500 and 533) a try. I kept my uboot env because yours doesn't seem
> to add any new parameters.
>
> They worked well but I have the same problems as Tha_Man : my FR doesn't
> resume after suspend.
>
> Back to your 400 uboot, the same QtMoko (same partitions and uboot env)
> suspends and resumes well.
>
> SHR-U suffers from the same symptoms.
>
> I hope you'll be able to track and solve this problem because FR is really
> faster at 500 or 533 Mhz and that's great.
>
> --
> David
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>

Try 450 or 465 versions. With them suspend and resume works well for me :)

-- 
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
dos

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-10 Thread Tha_Man

Hi, 
Gennady suggested the same thing, but the 450Mhz-settings fail on kernel
start (see my previous message, I haven't tried the 465 settings). These
settings need a recompiled kernel according to Gennady's first message, did
you recompile your kernel? If not, I'm very curious why it doesn't work for
me! I'm assuming you're running QtMoko v24 as well, either from SD or NAND. 

Cheers,
Tha_Man
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/cpu-reclocking-to-500Mhz-overclocking-to-533Mhz-performance-tests-and-bootloader-images-tp5242777p5278457.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-10 Thread Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 21:23, Tha_Man  wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Gennady suggested the same thing, but the 450Mhz-settings fail on kernel
> start (see my previous message, I haven't tried the 465 settings). These
> settings need a recompiled kernel according to Gennady's first message, did
> you recompile your kernel? If not, I'm very curious why it doesn't work for
> me! I'm assuming you're running QtMoko v24 as well, either from SD or NAND.
>
> Cheers,
> Tha_Man

450/112 and 465/116 settings work for me even with 1.55V (just tested)
and it seems to not work for others, as they need at least 1.65V :x
But I can't use 533/88 nor CLK3, so it seems to be kind of deal ;) (or
just component tolerance :D)

I'm using SHR with our default 2.6.32 kernel.

-- 
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
dos

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-10 Thread Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 21:36, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak  
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 21:23, Tha_Man  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Gennady suggested the same thing, but the 450Mhz-settings fail on kernel
>> start (see my previous message, I haven't tried the 465 settings). These
>> settings need a recompiled kernel according to Gennady's first message, did
>> you recompile your kernel? If not, I'm very curious why it doesn't work for
>> me! I'm assuming you're running QtMoko v24 as well, either from SD or NAND.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tha_Man
>
> 450/112 and 465/116 settings work for me even with 1.55V (just tested)
> and it seems to not work for others, as they need at least 1.65V :x
> But I can't use 533/88 nor CLK3, so it seems to be kind of deal ;) (or
> just component tolerance :D)
>
> I'm using SHR with our default 2.6.32 kernel.

If someone wants to test:
http://dos.openmoko.pl/overclock/qi-s3c2442-master_c38b062a609f1442-dos-465-116-1.55-1.8.udfu
Qi with CPU clocked at 465MHz with 1.55V and memory at 115MHz with
1.8V (so no kernel patch needed)
http://dos.openmoko.pl/overclock/465-116-1.55-1.8.patch

It works for me and so far seems to be stable, but most of you will
probably need memory voltage being bumped to 1.9V and for that you
need to patch kernel.

I have GTA02A5 with date code 20080621.

U-Boots compiled by gena2x are available at http://bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/

-- 
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
dos

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-10 Thread Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 22:22, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak  
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 21:36, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak  
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 21:23, Tha_Man  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Gennady suggested the same thing, but the 450Mhz-settings fail on kernel
>>> start (see my previous message, I haven't tried the 465 settings). These
>>> settings need a recompiled kernel according to Gennady's first message, did
>>> you recompile your kernel? If not, I'm very curious why it doesn't work for
>>> me! I'm assuming you're running QtMoko v24 as well, either from SD or NAND.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tha_Man
>>
>> 450/112 and 465/116 settings work for me even with 1.55V (just tested)
>> and it seems to not work for others, as they need at least 1.65V :x
>> But I can't use 533/88 nor CLK3, so it seems to be kind of deal ;) (or
>> just component tolerance :D)
>>
>> I'm using SHR with our default 2.6.32 kernel.
>
> If someone wants to test:
> http://dos.openmoko.pl/overclock/qi-s3c2442-master_c38b062a609f1442-dos-465-116-1.55-1.8.udfu
> Qi with CPU clocked at 465MHz with 1.55V and memory at 115MHz with
> 1.8V (so no kernel patch needed)
> http://dos.openmoko.pl/overclock/465-116-1.55-1.8.patch
>
> It works for me and so far seems to be stable, but most of you will
> probably need memory voltage being bumped to 1.9V and for that you
> need to patch kernel.
>
> I have GTA02A5 with date code 20080621.
>
> U-Boots compiled by gena2x are available at 
> http://bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/

More Qi's to test at http://dos.openmoko.pl/overclock/

-- 
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
dos

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community