Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-05 Thread t3st3r

Marcel de Jong wrote:

On 3/4/07, t3st3r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip

FYI: just to let you know, an anti-thief\anti-lost system for phones
already exists.Here is the story.Maybe someone already heard that
proprietary Siemens mobile phones (x55 series based on 80C166 CPU and
x65 and x75 series based on ARM9) were reverse-engineered deeply and
people has bypassed boot loader protection (preventing user's code from
being uploaded) so everyone can run it's own code on phone's CPU.Also I
heard some other vendors were hacked successfully as well.Some
SonyEricsson for example.

One of the first firmware patches has been the anti-thief subsystem.How
does it works?It does detects SIM card change (by IMSI checking IIRC)
and then SMSes to predefined number(s) (should be someone of your family
or friends of course).This reveals new phone number (allowing to take a
legal actions) and can allow owner to regain remote control, get
coordinates (actually, on Siemens phones you can get Cell ID at very
most, funny enough anyway).



But how does this affect resale of the device? Because then the new
owner inserts a new SIMcard, and then this mechanism would go active,
wouldn't it?
This subsystem was invented by geeks and intended for smart users only - 
you have to apply binary patch to firmware to use this. Of course you 
have to shut this subsystem down before selling phone. Or tell new owner 
how to deal with it if he\she is smart enough.But actually I have to 
admit that before selling phone it is a good idea to

1) revert all patches, if any (upload factory firmware)
2) reset all phone settings to factory defaults (and address 
books\SMSes as well)

3) revert filesystem to factory state.
At this point at least you're free from being bothered by new owner with 
any sort of firmware\settings problems and do not leak your private 
data.Ideal solution is to make FULL firmware backup of new phone (whole 
flash IC dumped) and when you're about to sell phone, just upload this 
backup before you're selling it (therefore returning device to backed up 
state, completely trashing private data and all things you messed 
up).Unfortunately, at home this is possible for some phones only (yep, 
Siemens phones for example) and this may require unreasonable efforts 
for some others.

I'm just curious, it sounds like an interesting idea.
Btw there is some problem.If this solution is default and popular, 
thieves and lucky people may become aware of it and may do something 
against this.So in general this will work only while solution is not 
very popular\custom\invisible.




snip

---
Marcel de Jong

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community





___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-04 Thread t3st3r

Paul Wouters wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:

  

Personally I like the idea of periodic SMS messages with the
lat/lon/altitude.  When in stolen mode, having the phone receive SMS
msgs containing commands for the phone would seem to be very useful.



The first thing that happens to a stolen phone is that the SIM is
chucked. You won't be able to *send* SMS messages, since you will not
know the phone number. Unless you make sure it SENDS you its new
phone number as well.
  
FYI: just to let you know, an anti-thief\anti-lost system for phones 
already exists.Here is the story.Maybe someone already heard that 
proprietary Siemens mobile phones (x55 series based on 80C166 CPU and 
x65 and x75 series based on ARM9) were reverse-engineered deeply and 
people has bypassed boot loader protection (preventing user's code from 
being uploaded) so everyone can run it's own code on phone's CPU.Also I 
heard some other vendors were hacked successfully as well.Some 
SonyEricsson for example.


One of the first firmware patches has been the anti-thief subsystem.How 
does it works?It does detects SIM card change (by IMSI checking IIRC) 
and then SMSes to predefined number(s) (should be someone of your family 
or friends of course).This reveals new phone number (allowing to take a 
legal actions) and can allow owner to regain remote control, get 
coordinates (actually, on Siemens phones you can get Cell ID at very 
most, funny enough anyway).


Btw, few interesting things to mention...
- People did implemented own run-time and executable files loader.It 
loads ARM .ELF files (lots of arm compilers can produce these 
files).Amazing hack.It allows direct code execution by user on main 
phone's CPU easily (almost as easy as launching Java apps).


- Trojans do you say?Well... you should be a real idiot to download real 
executable code from untrusted place.Anyway, I _never_ heard about ELF 
trojans and even Window$ Mobile allows to run unsigned code but it still 
lacks trojans hell as well.But there is already JAVA trojans targeted 
for USUAL restricted phones.Virtualization does not helps.Users are 
often stupid enough to confirm Java SMS send few times before they 
recognize it costs them few US $ per sms.The ONLY way to prevent abuse 
is to make users smarter. Otherwise no matter what is protection, it 
will fail due to user stupidity.The only perfect solution is either to 
disable to execute anything (even Java!) and have dumb dialer instead 
of smart phone or to educate users a bit so they're aware of potential 
issues. Also I guess that there is very few native code trojans just 
because stupid users are usually using stupid phones (which are able to 
dial and send smses and able just to run Java at very most) since 
they're cheaper.Smart phones users are usually smarter itself (they have 
to know why they're paying for more expensive device, right?) and hence 
they're less vulnerable to trojans.


- Also I have to admit funny thing.Those cell operators who afraid of 
network hacking and disable to run native code on the phones because of 
this are a *real morons*.There is already a dozens of hacked phones 
where user's code runs on main phone's CPU and while this is 1-chip 
solution, this code has COMPLETE access to cell networks, their 
internals and can craft absolutely any data to network.However I never 
heard about cell operator network hacked.But if someone will decide to 
hack network, he has just to use own hacked phone, replace SIM to target 
operator's one and (possibly) craft IMEI allowed to log in to network 
(perfectly possible of course once your code has full control on the 
whole phone, this can be illegal in some countries but hacking networks 
is illegal as well so who cares?).So, operators are better to secure 
their networks.Disabling to run native code just will cause users 
unhappy but it will actually never stop persons with evil intentions 
from doing something wrong with network.Actually looks like an ostrich 
:).Hiding just an head will not save their ass, even if they can no 
longer see danger when head is hidden.
  

Something as simple as having a way of remotely submitting a short
shell script would do the trick.



Stuffing something useful in 160 chars is hard. It's better to design
things beforehand, so you can just send simple commands with arguments.

I wonder if you can send SMSes on the Neo without the user noticing
anything, or wether things like the backlight will be turned on (by the
closed off chip hardware).

Paul

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


  



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-04 Thread Marcel de Jong

On 3/4/07, t3st3r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip

FYI: just to let you know, an anti-thief\anti-lost system for phones
already exists.Here is the story.Maybe someone already heard that
proprietary Siemens mobile phones (x55 series based on 80C166 CPU and
x65 and x75 series based on ARM9) were reverse-engineered deeply and
people has bypassed boot loader protection (preventing user's code from
being uploaded) so everyone can run it's own code on phone's CPU.Also I
heard some other vendors were hacked successfully as well.Some
SonyEricsson for example.

One of the first firmware patches has been the anti-thief subsystem.How
does it works?It does detects SIM card change (by IMSI checking IIRC)
and then SMSes to predefined number(s) (should be someone of your family
or friends of course).This reveals new phone number (allowing to take a
legal actions) and can allow owner to regain remote control, get
coordinates (actually, on Siemens phones you can get Cell ID at very
most, funny enough anyway).



But how does this affect resale of the device? Because then the new
owner inserts a new SIMcard, and then this mechanism would go active,
wouldn't it?
I'm just curious, it sounds like an interesting idea.

snip

---
Marcel de Jong

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-04 Thread Ian Stirling

t3st3r wrote:

so, operators are better to secure their networks.


You do realise that this essentially means 'throw away all existing GSM 
phones' ?


If you can clone the IMEI of a phone, the network has no way of telling 
it from the cloned phone.
Yes, you can do potentially clever things on the network thing, like 
disabling new clones of phones in distant locations, but with existing 
phones, there is no way of doing it.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: A new approach to Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-02 Thread Ortwin Regel

The thing has bluetooth so it should be able to connect to the
Wiimote. Using one instead of an internal accelerometer makes sense,
because when you move your phone around, it's hard to keep looking at
the screen.

Ortwin

On 3/1/07, adrian cockcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I would like to include an accelerometer in a phone design (my own
homebrew design or a future Neo perhaps?), then all the Nintendo Wii
style interactions become possible.

If my phone is locked it asserts that it should be at rest, if someone
picks it up it needs a code or a secret gesture on the touchscreen to
unlock it or set moving locked mode.

if it doesn't get the code it asks to be put down again, if that fails
it complains loudly in speakerphone help, I'm being stolen, put me
back! or whatever audio you like.

It also posts its location to a web service.

Should be easy enough to code, I'm just waiting for the hardware to catch up...

Adrian

On 2/28/07, Attila Csipa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wednesday 28 February 2007 21:44, Steven ** wrote:
  Caveat emptor.  Possession of stolen property is still a crime where I
  live, even if you didn't do the actual stealing.

 All I'm saying (IANAL of course) that for many of those items (especially on
 places like ebay) it is very hard for the buyer to establish whether the good
 is actually stolen or not (receipts and boxes can be photoshopped all too
 easy), and he has to rely on a level of reasonable doubt (based on seller
 rating, price, provided images, etc) to determine whether he is getting the
 good from a trustworthy source.

 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-01 Thread Christian T.
Attila Csipa wrote:
 Only if the thief actually sets up SMS (if his SIM is of a different 
 provider, 
 the service center likely needs to be changed).

I have one unlocked phone and I'm changing between two SIMs (different
providers) and somehow it seems to configure that automagically. I
guess, the configuration is on the SIM. It's like that for all Austrian
providers i tried. So at least here in Austria that should work fine.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-01 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Thursday 01 March 2007 14:20:32 Christian T. wrote:
 I have one unlocked phone and I'm changing between two SIMs (different
 providers) and somehow it seems to configure that automagically. I
 guess, the configuration is on the SIM. It's like that for all Austrian
 providers i tried. So at least here in Austria that should work fine.

I agree, I have never had to configure anything to use SMS with any phone I 
ever used. Or for that matter with someone else's SIM in my phone if their 
battery was empty or some such.


pgpercY02wkt5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: A new approach to Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection -THE REAL PROBLEM APPEARED!

2007-03-01 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 01 March 2007 08:41, you wrote:
 later someone will write a Troyan Horse, some king of dialer (like for
 application made calls and sent smses. Openmoko kernel should log any

 What do you think?

There are two sides to this problem - one, the origin of software. This has 
actually been dealt with so we have examples like the Debian repositories 
which verify (gpg signatures, etc) packages so you know that the thing you 
are installing actually came from a place/person you trust. The other problem 
is just as present on regular PC-s, as you have trojans which, when run, 
change your dialup settings so you dial a high-price number on the other side 
the globe instead of your regular ISP. The second aspect is protection from 
malware. There are several solutions on this - proper user rights, 
virtualization, and filtering on the API level of the phone itself, best to 
combine all of these, since kernel logging won't help much if the trojan has 
root access and hides/works in the kernel as a module, for example.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-01 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 01 March 2007 14:20, Christian T. wrote:
 Attila Csipa wrote:
  Only if the thief actually sets up SMS (if his SIM is of a different
  provider, the service center likely needs to be changed).

 I have one unlocked phone and I'm changing between two SIMs (different
 providers) and somehow it seems to configure that automagically. I
 guess, the configuration is on the SIM. It's like that for all Austrian
 providers i tried. So at least here in Austria that should work fine.

OK, so to correct myself - it IS working by default - apparently stored on the 
SIM and preconfigured by the provider in most places. The correct statement 
is thus if the thief doesn't disable SMS by changing the SMSC (less likely, 
but possible without much effort).

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-01 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:

 Personally I like the idea of periodic SMS messages with the
 lat/lon/altitude.  When in stolen mode, having the phone receive SMS
 msgs containing commands for the phone would seem to be very useful.

The first thing that happens to a stolen phone is that the SIM is
chucked. You won't be able to *send* SMS messages, since you will not
know the phone number. Unless you make sure it SENDS you its new
phone number as well.

 Something as simple as having a way of remotely submitting a short
 shell script would do the trick.

Stuffing something useful in 160 chars is hard. It's better to design
things beforehand, so you can just send simple commands with arguments.

I wonder if you can send SMSes on the Neo without the user noticing
anything, or wether things like the backlight will be turned on (by the
closed off chip hardware).

Paul

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: A new approach to Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-03-01 Thread adrian cockcroft

I would like to include an accelerometer in a phone design (my own
homebrew design or a future Neo perhaps?), then all the Nintendo Wii
style interactions become possible.

If my phone is locked it asserts that it should be at rest, if someone
picks it up it needs a code or a secret gesture on the touchscreen to
unlock it or set moving locked mode.

if it doesn't get the code it asks to be put down again, if that fails
it complains loudly in speakerphone help, I'm being stolen, put me
back! or whatever audio you like.

It also posts its location to a web service.

Should be easy enough to code, I'm just waiting for the hardware to catch up...

Adrian

On 2/28/07, Attila Csipa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wednesday 28 February 2007 21:44, Steven ** wrote:
 Caveat emptor.  Possession of stolen property is still a crime where I
 live, even if you didn't do the actual stealing.

All I'm saying (IANAL of course) that for many of those items (especially on
places like ebay) it is very hard for the buyer to establish whether the good
is actually stolen or not (receipts and boxes can be photoshopped all too
easy), and he has to rely on a level of reasonable doubt (based on seller
rating, price, provided images, etc) to determine whether he is getting the
good from a trustworthy source.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Christian T.
 I like the idea. I agree with Cayco, that you cannot ask police to catch
 the thief.
Actually in some contries that might work. :)

 But sending coords would be very interesting solution.
 As the GPS coords may be not very accurate I'd extend the idea to
 bluetooth connection which is a very short range, to point person who
 owns the stolen phone.
 The phone might change it's bluetooth device name to some special string
 (like stolen NEO :-) ) so we might detect it in a short range and
 point person who owns it.
That's a really good idea.

 Phone after detecting theft should work with thief's SIM card as usual
 but also send GPS coords.
 
 Remember that if you use PIN code thief cannot use your SIM until he
 types right PIN. He/she should use his own SIM card.
Here's the problem: Although it's a good idea that the thief has to use
his own SIM (that's what he expects anyway) but it won't be easy to get
a GPRS-connection for sending the coordinates. If he is using another
provider, the settings will differ. Many providers even demand a
password for opening a data-connection...

The theft-problem _could_ be solved by the providers. They can locate
any cellphone anyway and should be able to give information to the
police, when a cellphone with an IMEI that's reported stolen connects to
their network. But they don't want to!

And a professional thief who is able to change the IMEI somehow will
also be able to reflash the Neo1973...


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Christopher Tokarczyk

Hi all,

In addition to the data suggested to be sent when a phone is in stolen
mode, such as GPS, perhaps the phone could even send other data. If
the person uses a stolen phone to store contacts, send the contacts.
in fact, send the numbers dialed, too. If they use it to manage email,
forward the email. What I imagine is the phone passively building a
profile of the thief. The more info gathered, the easier to find the
phone. I understand this could give rise to privacy concerns, but I
think ideally be an issue only for the thief.

And with respect to over which connection to send this data, I imagine
it would be possible to just rely on the underlying connection
manager. It would handle establishing connections, and then kick-off
the anti-theft measures as required.

Just my thoughts after seeing some of the discussion on this list.

Thanks,
Chris

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Krzysztof Kajkowski

2007/2/28, Bartłomiej Zdanowski DRP AC2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 Hi.



 That's the solution! Let thief pay for data transmission :-)


How about silently calling 0700 and othe highly price erotic phone lines?

:-D

cayco
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Christian T.
Bartłomiej Zdanowski DRP AC2 wrote:
 I asked my colleagues for a solution. For non-existent or disabled GPRS
 connection our devices use SMS messages for reporting current status and
 position.
 That's the solution! Let thief pay for data transmission :-)

well, of course. didn't think of that. how was that with the forest and
the trees? :)

you can pack a lot of information into 160bytes - it doesn't have to be
human-readable - and SMS are almost realtime as long as the provider
doesn't have problems. and if you have an sms-email-gateway somewhere
that solves the problem where to send the data (since your phone is gone).

IMO sms should be the standard-method, because it should always work.

Christian.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread s . jolicoeur

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
  Locking the phone and receiving GPS position is great but how 
 do you 
  find your Neo in a crowd when the thief as it in is pocket. I 
 would 
  add 2 more options to the list.
 It was solved a few answers ago via bluetooth.

How will you detect the bluetooth stolen name if you don't have a phone 
anymore ?. Not all phones have bluetooth and not everybody uses it. Bluetooth 
enable phones don't look for devices indefinitely and bluetooth is not always 
on and being on all the time is considered a security hole. So i wonder how 
someone loosing or getting is Neo stolen can retrieve it via bluetooth without 
having to get a bluetooth phone or enabled device capable of reading the tag. 

The idea is great and should be kept but how don't see myself running to the 
closest cellphone dealer to get a 50$ bluetooth enable cellphone to pinpoint my 
400$ Neo. Sounds illogical to me

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Bartłomiej Zdanowski DRP AC2 writes:

I like the idea. I agree with Cayco, that you cannot ask police to catch 
the thief. But sending coords would be very interesting solution.
As the GPS coords may be not very accurate I'd extend the idea to 
bluetooth connection which is a very short range, to point person who 
owns the stolen phone.
The phone might change it's bluetooth device name to some special string 
(like stolen NEO :-) ) so we might detect it in a short range and 
point person who owns it.

And when your bluetooth headset gets near enough it could start
screaming help!  I'm stolen! at the top of its 1 watt lungs  :)

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Christopher Tokarczyk

this also looks like these things can be categorized into different groups.

First, there are events or situations that set off the stolen-mode
(such as wrong pin, owner sending a message to the phone, possibly
even getting close to a gps coordinate, etc.).

Then there are actions to be taken: emit noise, turn off calling
features, phone home, send email home, broadcast message over
bluetooth, etc.

Then, it's just a matter of letting the user determine which actions
to kick off when an event occurs, which should be pretty simple to
configure/understand for even the non-tech savy users.



Semi-related: Does anyone know of a page on the wiki that deals with
this anti-theft discussion? Perhaps someone could add a page if it
doesn't? (I don't know how restricted the wiki is). It seems like a
good place to keep track of the ideas in addition to this list.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Aloril
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:13 -0500, Christopher Tokarczyk wrote:

 Semi-related: Does anyone know of a page on the wiki that deals with
 this anti-theft discussion? Perhaps someone could add a page if it
 doesn't? (I don't know how restricted the wiki is). It seems like a
 good place to keep track of the ideas in addition to this list.

http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Wishlist:Tracking_lost_phone

(I think I created that page same day I mailed idea, but should have
done other way around: create page and then mail ;-)

-- 
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 15:09:47 Krzysztof Kajkowski wrote:
 2007/2/28, Bartłomiej Zdanowski DRP AC2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   Hi.
 
   That's the solution! Let thief pay for data transmission :-)

 How about silently calling 0700 and othe highly price erotic phone lines?

Improving on the idea: get someone to operate one of those 0900 numbers in 
each country (usualy they dont really work cross country very well) who will 
then give the proceeds to the owner of the stolen phone so he can buy a new 
one... Or even just sending over priced SMS, that's even less obvious.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Aaron Coats
Once the phone goes into Stolen Mode the Bluetooth radio could be  
turned on continuously.  You don't need to use another phone to  
detect Bluetooth, many laptops (most Macs) have built-in BT and if  
they don't you can get a dongle.


-Aaron

On Feb 28, 2007, at 7:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):

Locking the phone and receiving GPS position is great but how

do you

find your Neo in a crowd when the thief as it in is pocket. I

would

add 2 more options to the list.

It was solved a few answers ago via bluetooth.


How will you detect the bluetooth stolen name if you don't have a  
phone anymore ?. Not all phones have bluetooth and not everybody  
uses it. Bluetooth enable phones don't look for devices  
indefinitely and bluetooth is not always on and being on all the  
time is considered a security hole. So i wonder how someone loosing  
or getting is Neo stolen can retrieve it via bluetooth without  
having to get a bluetooth phone or enabled device capable of  
reading the tag.


The idea is great and should be kept but how don't see myself  
running to the closest cellphone dealer to get a 50$ bluetooth  
enable cellphone to pinpoint my 400$ Neo. Sounds illogical to me


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Aaron Coats
This seems like it would encourage the thief to destroy the phone,  
remember, he/she stole it it isn't worth much to them.  Now if the  
audible message were something like, I'M LOST, HELP ME FIND MY  
OWNER  the the thief might be guilted into giving the phone back and  
might not be as likely to smash the thing under their heal.  An  
option would be to have the owner record what ever message they want.


On Feb 28, 2007, at 6:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

This way not only will the thief will be surprised it would  
obviously alarm everyone around him and the only way to turn the  
msg off would be to remove the battery. Either way the thief would  
stand out from the crowd and be more easy to spot.


*Better yet why not modify the phone to incorporate a small watch  
battery under a screwed cover to keep the Stolen Mode active even  
if the thief manages to pry open the back panel and remove the  
primary battery.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


A new approach to Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Attila Csipa
A lot of ideas have been written on anti theft protection, but much of it from 
a geek/user's standpoint, and almost completely forgetting the possible 
ramifications of the suggested techniques. First of all, none of the 
techniques presented PROTECT your phone from being stolen (they fall more to 
the find-your-lost-phone category). Second, in most countries I know of you 
cannot act on your own without the help/presence of law enforcement persons. 
Although this may sound strange and ineffective at first, it makes a lot of 
sense from a police perspective. What would you do if you confronted a 
criminal who stole your phone ? What if he is dangerous ? What if you get 
hurt in the process ? What if the person who has the phone and whom you are 
shouting at/calling a thief is actually innocent and knows nothing of the 
origin of the phone ? Which brings us to the next concern - stolen phones 
usually do not get regularly used by the persons who actually stole them, and 
most certainly not used by their money - their SIMs are just as stolen. They 
might drain your account with expensive calls, but chances are high that the 
phone will soon get sold through ads and/or ebay. If the persons in charge do 
this 'professionally' they will surely flash the phone (the Neo1973 is here 
at a little advantage by not being a widespread/common phone). Thus there is 
no guarantee that you are spending the thiefs money - in fact, it is much 
more probable that you are tracking and wasting an unsuspecting victims 
money. How would you feel if you bought a slightly used Neo1973 only to find 
out that it is sending expensive foreign/roaming SMS-es because the previous 
owner 'forgot' to turn off a silent alarm/anti theft application ? As you can 
see the problem of phone theft is not that simple as relaying coordinates 
back to yourself - a much broader topic must be analysed to tackle this 
issue - and although the GPS might help a little, it is not really a silver 
bullet in this matter.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread kkr
Le mercredi 28 février 2007 à 18:00 +0100, Gabriel Ambuehl a écrit :
snip
 Improving on the idea: get someone to operate one of those 0900 numbers in 
 each country (usualy they dont really work cross country very well) who will 
 then give the proceeds to the owner of the stolen phone so he can buy a new 
 one... Or even just sending over priced SMS, that's even less obvious.
snip

That's exactly what I'm thinking too :-)



Globally, the idea to protect the phone against the theft has already
been expressed many time before:
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2007-February/002910.html

And even much more before (12 Dec 2006):
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2006-December/000748.html

It could be good to summarize on the wiki all these ideas expressed
before on this mailing list (google: site:openmoko.org phone thief).


It seem to me that two ideas are news:
- the overtaxed calling number (for the profit of the victim)
- bluetooth localisation (with the headset or another phone)


Regards,




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread s . jolicoeur
True but  most cellphone get lost mostly on the bus, metro, restaurants,etc. 
Misplacing the phone home is not as dramatic as losing it in a public place. 
Looking for it with your laptop at home maybe the solution but is it most 
viable for the metro or the restaurant or any public places ?What i don't like 
is the idea that a must pay to find my lost phone. Sure it's better to pay a 
small amount and recover your phone but i don't find the idea practical.- 
Original Message -From: Aaron Coats [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Wednesday, 
February 28, 2007 2:38 pmSubject: Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protectionTo: 
community@lists.openmoko.org Once the phone goes into Stolen Mode the 
Bluetooth radio could  be   turned on continuously.  You don't need to use 
another phone to   detect Bluetooth, many laptops (most Macs) have built-in BT 
and  if   they don't you can get a dongle.  -Aaron  On Feb 28, 2007, at 
7:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):  
Locking the phone and receiving GPS position is great but how  do you  
find your Neo in a crowd when the thief as it in is pocket. I  would  
add 2 more options to the list.  It was solved a few answers ago via 
bluetooth.   How will you detect the bluetooth stolen name if you don't  
have aphone anymore ?. Not all phones have bluetooth and not  everybody  
  uses it. Bluetooth enable phones don't look for devicesindefinitely 
and bluetooth is not always on and being on all  thetime is considered a 
security hole. So i wonder how someone  loosingor getting is Neo stolen 
can retrieve it via bluetooth withouthaving to get a bluetooth phone or 
enabled device capable ofreading the tag.   The idea is great and 
should be kept but how don't see myselfrunning to the closest cellphone 
dealer to get a 50$ bluetoothenable cellphone to pinpoint my 400$ Neo. 
Sounds illogical to me   ___  
OpenMoko community mailing list  community@lists.openmoko.org  
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community   
___ OpenMoko community mailing 
list community@lists.openmoko.org 
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Aaron Coats writes:
This seems like it would encourage the thief to destroy the phone,  
remember, he/she stole it it isn't worth much to them.  Now if the  

Remember, my version of the stolen behavior called for the phone to
pretend it's a brick (while sending SMS messages giving its position,
as somebody else suggested), and not crying for help until it's
*within* range of the owner's bluetooth.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Christopher Tokarczyk

I think the disagreement over what the phone ideally should do when
stolen is even more support for the proposition that there should be a
way for the owner to configure this behavior.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: A new approach to Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Steven **

Caveat emptor.  Possession of stolen property is still a crime where I
live, even if you didn't do the actual stealing.

That said, I agree that attempting to rack up a large bill will not
prevent theft nor lead to the return of the phone.  Any anti-theft
mechanisms should focus on locating the phone.  We could maybe have
the option of disabling the phone.  But the only way to disable this
open-source phone would be with some hardware lock.  I don't
particularly like the idea that my phone could be locked.  Even if it
should only happen to a thief, if it has the capability, it could be
abused.  We're treading too closely to the blasphemous idea of
trusted computing.

-Steven

On 2/28/07, Attila Csipa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A lot of ideas have been written on anti theft protection, but much of it from
a geek/user's standpoint, and almost completely forgetting the possible
ramifications of the suggested techniques. First of all, none of the
techniques presented PROTECT your phone from being stolen (they fall more to
the find-your-lost-phone category). Second, in most countries I know of you
cannot act on your own without the help/presence of law enforcement persons.
Although this may sound strange and ineffective at first, it makes a lot of
sense from a police perspective. What would you do if you confronted a
criminal who stole your phone ? What if he is dangerous ? What if you get
hurt in the process ? What if the person who has the phone and whom you are
shouting at/calling a thief is actually innocent and knows nothing of the
origin of the phone ? Which brings us to the next concern - stolen phones
usually do not get regularly used by the persons who actually stole them, and
most certainly not used by their money - their SIMs are just as stolen. They
might drain your account with expensive calls, but chances are high that the
phone will soon get sold through ads and/or ebay. If the persons in charge do
this 'professionally' they will surely flash the phone (the Neo1973 is here
at a little advantage by not being a widespread/common phone). Thus there is
no guarantee that you are spending the thiefs money - in fact, it is much
more probable that you are tracking and wasting an unsuspecting victims
money. How would you feel if you bought a slightly used Neo1973 only to find
out that it is sending expensive foreign/roaming SMS-es because the previous
owner 'forgot' to turn off a silent alarm/anti theft application ? As you can
see the problem of phone theft is not that simple as relaying coordinates
back to yourself - a much broader topic must be analysed to tackle this
issue - and although the GPS might help a little, it is not really a silver
bullet in this matter.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: A new approach to Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Attila Csipa
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 21:29, kkr wrote:
  out that it is sending expensive foreign/roaming SMS-es because the
  previous owner 'forgot' to turn off a silent alarm/anti theft application

 Is the same for car alarm... When you sold something, you do have to do
 the necessary action (in other case, you're too responsive for the
 damage)

It seems I have been a bit too cryptic - I put the word forgot in '' exactly 
because that way a Neo seller can fraud you by _intentionally_ doing this. 
Image the suggestion in a previous message in this context: 

overtaxed calling number (for the profit of the victim). 

If someone sells you a phone with that enabled _on purpose_, so he would get 
both the price of the phone AND some money frauded from the unsuspecting 
buyer (and claim later that he either did not get any money or that the theft 
alarm was not on on purpose). If he does this on a small scale, he could even 
get away unnoticed for months or years sipping a few $ per month from the 
real victim which is in that case the new owner of the phone. That's one of 
the main reasons why proactive theft reactions, especially financial, are NOT 
really an option.

 In this case, when you buy on ebay, you do have to receive the prove
 that the phone is not stolen, in other case (even if I'm not a lower),
 the buyer is too in fault...

Since in our case it is already a second hand item proof of purchase is not 
readily available on most of the ebay items in that category - not many 
customers keep the papers, or even boxes that came with the phone. Sure, you 
can say that it is unwise or even illegal, but many of the used items on ebay 
have absolutely no 'proof of ownership' (do you ask proof of ownership on a 
garage sale or a flea market ?).


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: A new approach to Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Attila Csipa
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 21:44, Steven ** wrote:
 Caveat emptor.  Possession of stolen property is still a crime where I
 live, even if you didn't do the actual stealing.

All I'm saying (IANAL of course) that for many of those items (especially on 
places like ebay) it is very hard for the buyer to establish whether the good 
is actually stolen or not (receipts and boxes can be photoshopped all too 
easy), and he has to rely on a level of reasonable doubt (based on seller 
rating, price, provided images, etc) to determine whether he is getting the 
good from a trustworthy source.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-28 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht

Christopher Tokarczyk writes:
 I think the disagreement over what the phone ideally should do when
 stolen is even more support for the proposition that there should be a
 way for the owner to configure this behavior.

In addition, it would be very useful if the phone was reconfigurable
*after* it was stolen. It would be very frustrating to have a good
idea and then not be able to implement it because the phone could only
be programed while having physical access to it.

Personally I like the idea of periodic SMS messages with the
lat/lon/altitude.  When in stolen mode, having the phone receive SMS
msgs containing commands for the phone would seem to be very useful.
Something as simple as having a way of remotely submitting a short
shell script would do the trick.

-wolfgang
-- 
Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-27 Thread Aloril
When phone is lost and somebody picks it up, it would first ask PIN
and have message in screen that says something like If you don't know
PIN, give 1234. If user types 1234 then it presents 2 buttons:
Contact owner of phone and Use phone (==I'm stealing this). If
user selects Use phone, then it would present factory looking
interface with empty address book, etc.. and quietly contact owner
anyway and tell current coordinates ;-) Idea is keep thief using phone
until police arrives and recovers it. If phone notices new SIM, it
would go directly to I'm stolen mode. Maybe run under Linux-VServer
http://www.linux-vserver.org/ in stolen mode.


With suitable arrangement remote ssh connection to phone should be
possible which would give nice control over stolen phone.


There could also be a bluetooth headset and/or bluetooth watch.  If it
loses contact to phone, phone would complain loudly and if bluetooth
gadget is enough smart it could complain too. This gadget could warn
about low battery too.

-- 
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-27 Thread Krzysztof Kajkowski

2007/2/27, Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Idea is keep thief using phone
until police arrives and recovers it.


Yeah, and maybe call nearest SWAT team to clear the area :-P I doubt
if police would bother in chasing thief for one phone (at least where
I live). They should at least have some warrant ;-)

To be serious I would rather do not want that thief could tallk on my
bill. Better solution would be to pretend that phone is turned off and
silently sent GPS coords.

cayco

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Itch3: Anti-lost/theft protection

2007-02-27 Thread Jan Van Vlaenderen

Euhhh, I do not want the thief to make international calls on my bill

May be the phone should simulate that it's switched off ( to save power )
and send from time to time the coordinates.

Jan.

On 2/27/07, Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


When phone is lost and somebody picks it up, it would first ask PIN
and have message in screen that says something like If you don't know
PIN, give 1234. If user types 1234 then it presents 2 buttons:
Contact owner of phone and Use phone (==I'm stealing this). If
user selects Use phone, then it would present factory looking
interface with empty address book, etc.. and quietly contact owner
anyway and tell current coordinates ;-) Idea is keep thief using phone
until police arrives and recovers it. If phone notices new SIM, it
would go directly to I'm stolen mode. Maybe run under Linux-VServer
http://www.linux-vserver.org/ in stolen mode.


With suitable arrangement remote ssh connection to phone should be
possible which would give nice control over stolen phone.


There could also be a bluetooth headset and/or bluetooth watch.  If it
loses contact to phone, phone would complain loudly and if bluetooth
gadget is enough smart it could complain too. This gadget could warn
about low battery too.

--
Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community





--
If you don't like something, change it. If you can't change it, change your
attitude. Don't complain.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community