Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-20 Thread Santiago Crespo
El lun, 16-07-2007 a las 13:10 -0400, Ian Darwin escribió:

 Calling it the free(d) phone to consumers (as opposed to developers) 
 is going to engender an enormous amount of confusion and ill-will.

 Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The 
 Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know.

I like the spanish term: libre (like in ubuntu cd-box).

The libre phone.


signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada	digitalmente
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-20 Thread Ted Lemon

On Jul 20, 2007, at 2:31 AM, Santiago Crespo wrote:

I like the spanish term: libre (like in ubuntu cd-box).


It's not a bad word, but unfortunately when I hear it I get an image  
of a guy wearing army fatigues and carrying an automatic weapon.   To  
some extent I think choosing a branding that will work in every  
country is a hopeless task.   I mean, Coke and McDonald's seem to  
have done it, but I don't know of a lot of others...



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread ramsesoriginal

The Open Phone
Our Phone
The Human Phone (ok, sounds a bit like Ubuntu)
Free your Phone (wich obviously is not the same as The free phone. It
sounds good, and is already used in the youtube ads)
More then a Phone
Phone++
The Phone from people to people
The Freedom Phone
Teh ub3rz h4ck70r7 Ph0n3!!11oneeleven

btw not only in North America The free phone could be missleading, because
everywhere operators did that strategy. But only in english this could be
misleading, because in other languages free (si in beer) is not the same as
free (es in freedom). for example german kostenlos/gratis frei, italian
gratuito libero (even if libero is(was?)a phone carrier), ...

p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the respond-to
adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
My corner of the web: http://ramsesoriginal.wordpress.com
My dream, my world: http://abenu.wordpress.com
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Mikko Rauhala
ti, 2007-07-17 kello 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal kirjoitti:
 p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the
 respond-to adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hate gmail and complain to them all you want, please don't imply the
list should be broken because of that.

I shan't continue on the subject, but thought it necessary to note the
opposing opinion's presence in this context.

-- 
Mikko Rauhala   - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - URL:http://www.iki.fi/mjr/
Transhumanist   - WTA member - URL:http://www.transhumanism.org/
Singularitarian - SIAI supporter - URL:http://www.singinst.org/


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik
On 13:25:09 2007-07-17 Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 7/17/07, Mikko Rauhala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  ti, 2007-07-17 kello 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal kirjoitti:
   p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the
   respond-to adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Hate gmail and complain to them all you want, please don't imply the
  list should be broken because of that.
 
  I shan't continue on the subject, but thought it necessary to note the
  opposing opinion's presence in this context.
 
 it's nothing to do with gmail. the reply-to field has not been set on
 the openmoko mail server, so replies to messages default to the
 sender. this is fine in most cases, but not on mailing lists
 

There's as list-reply header set which any sane mail client should be able
to use... My webmail using hastymail even has a Reply To Mailing List button


--
Andraž ruskie Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.

Key id = F4C1F89C
Key fingerprint = 6FF2 8F20 4C9D DB36 B5B6  F134 884D 72CC F4C1 F89C


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Jim Paris
 p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the respond-to
 adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Having the list server change the reply-to header is wrong.  Please read
  http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful

I don't use Gmail, but a quick google search tells me that the 
shortcut a will reply-to-all, which would be the correct way to
respond to messages on-list.

-jim

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread digger vermont

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal wrote:
 The Open Phone
 Our Phone

Just oPhone

I've always dislike the I and My stuff.

digger


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Luit van Drongelen

oPhone sounds great too...

but not this oPhone:
http://soapbox.msn.com/video.aspx?vid=79996a20-e2de-4757-8d22-dfc5a44acfc7


--
Luit

On 7/17/07, digger vermont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal wrote:
 The Open Phone
 Our Phone

Just oPhone

I've always dislike the I and My stuff.

digger


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Giles Jones
Digger Vermont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :

 Just oPhone
 
 I've always dislike the I and My stuff.

Not even sure it should be branded as just a phone. 

Always preferred the communicator label myself :)

---
G O Jones





___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Robin Paulson writes:

it's nothing to do with gmail. the reply-to field has not been set on
the openmoko mail server, so replies to messages default to the
sender. this is fine in most cases, but not on mailing lists

This has been discussed to death in the past, with no consensus on
what proper behavior is.  It seems pretty clear that the list admin is
in the don't munge reply-to camp, so the list isn't going to start
doing it.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Ted Lemon

On Jul 17, 2007, at 12:59 AM, ramsesoriginal wrote:

Teh ub3rz h4ck70r7 Ph0n3!!11oneeleven


Perfect.   :')

Honestly, I don't think this is something that one needs to worry  
about.   What's going to happen if OpenMoko really becomes usable is  
that various vendors will adopt it in markets that will take it,  
because it's cheaper and (assuming we do our job right) nicer than  
the alternatives.


And then you will see the Motorola OpenRAZR, the Samsung tFree, and  
like that, and hopefully FIC will find itself a real player in the  
high-end phone category as well.   So take delivery of your phone,  
and do something cool with it.



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Ian Darwin


I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains: one on 
maisntream media: maybe tv, maybe radio, flyre, poster, newspapers, 
wathever.  This ads would be something like: The free phone, OpenMoko. 
The only one with  The OpenMoko: now with builtin navigator and 
so on. Don't even THINK of using based on Linux Kernel 2.6.xx or With 
powerful ssh acess


Calling it the free(d) phone to consumers (as opposed to developers) 
is going to engender an enormous amount of confusion and ill-will.


Why? Because (at least in North America) the major carriers have spent 
years, and billions of dollars, totally subverting the meaning of the 
phrase free phone to mean we give you the cheapest phone we can find 
and don't charge you for this piece of junk when you lock into a two- or 
three-year plan at some exorbitant rate that obviously includes the cost 
of the phone amortized.


Seriously, ask consumers what a free phone means. at least 11 out of 
10 will give you the definition above, at least the parts they understand.


A consumer ad campaign is NOT the place to push the free as in beer vs 
free as in speech argument. The phrase free phone already means the 
opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move on.


Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The 
Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Vincent

On 16/07/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains: one on
 maisntream media: maybe tv, maybe radio, flyre, poster, newspapers,
 wathever.  This ads would be something like: The free phone, OpenMoko.
 The only one with  The OpenMoko: now with builtin navigator and
 so on. Don't even THINK of using based on Linux Kernel 2.6.xx or With
 powerful ssh acess

Calling it the free(d) phone to consumers (as opposed to developers)
is going to engender an enormous amount of confusion and ill-will.

Why? Because (at least in North America) the major carriers have spent
years, and billions of dollars, totally subverting the meaning of the
phrase free phone to mean we give you the cheapest phone we can find
and don't charge you for this piece of junk when you lock into a two- or
three-year plan at some exorbitant rate that obviously includes the cost
of the phone amortized.

Seriously, ask consumers what a free phone means. at least 11 out of
10 will give you the definition above, at least the parts they understand.

A consumer ad campaign is NOT the place to push the free as in beer vs
free as in speech argument. The phrase free phone already means the
opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move on.

Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The
Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know.




The you're in control-phone? :P

Anyway, it would be weird calling it *the* free phone anyway, as I assume
the Neo won't be the only OpenMoko-powered phone.

--
Vincent
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Shawn Rutledge

How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone?

On 7/16/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains: one on
 maisntream media: maybe tv, maybe radio, flyre, poster, newspapers,
 wathever.  This ads would be something like: The free phone, OpenMoko.
 The only one with  The OpenMoko: now with builtin navigator and
 so on. Don't even THINK of using based on Linux Kernel 2.6.xx or With
 powerful ssh acess

Calling it the free(d) phone to consumers (as opposed to developers)
is going to engender an enormous amount of confusion and ill-will.

Why? Because (at least in North America) the major carriers have spent
years, and billions of dollars, totally subverting the meaning of the
phrase free phone to mean we give you the cheapest phone we can find
and don't charge you for this piece of junk when you lock into a two- or
three-year plan at some exorbitant rate that obviously includes the cost
of the phone amortized.

Seriously, ask consumers what a free phone means. at least 11 out of
10 will give you the definition above, at least the parts they understand.

A consumer ad campaign is NOT the place to push the free as in beer vs
free as in speech argument. The phrase free phone already means the
opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move on.

Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The
Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Marc-Olivier Barre

On 7/16/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone?



First thing I thought about when I saw youPhone was youTube... it
seems a bit to obvious, sorry.
__
Marc-Olivier Barre.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Monday 16 July 2007 20:24:18 Shawn Rutledge wrote:
 How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone?

u is often short for the Greek letter \mu (in Latex notation) which in turn is 
used as a sign for micro in many places. That may confuse people as it might 
mean microphone then?


pgpPDRRoFs3Pl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Tim Newsom

OK.. Great minds think alike... Or maybe not. /grin

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:11, Shawn Rutledge wrote:

How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone?

On 7/16/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains: 
one on

 maisntream media: maybe tv, maybe radio, flyre, poster, newspapers,
 wathever.  This ads would be something like: The free phone, 
OpenMoko.

 The only one with  The OpenMoko: now with builtin navigator and
 so on. Don't even THINK of using based on Linux Kernel 2.6.xx or 
With

 powerful ssh acess


Calling it the free(d) phone to consumers (as opposed to developers)
is going to engender an enormous amount of confusion and ill-will.

Why? Because (at least in North America) the major carriers have spent
years, and billions of dollars, totally subverting the meaning of the
phrase free phone to mean we give you the cheapest phone we can find
and don't charge you for this piece of junk when you lock into a two- 
or
three-year plan at some exorbitant rate that obviously includes the 
cost

of the phone amortized.

Seriously, ask consumers what a free phone means. at least 11 out of
10 will give you the definition above, at least the parts they 
understand.


A consumer ad campaign is NOT the place to push the free as in beer vs
free as in speech argument. The phrase free phone already means the
opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move 
on.


Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The
Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

--Tim

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Shawn Rutledge

I thought of that too but don't see it as a problem.  Still seems like
a euphonious name to me.

On 7/16/07, Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 7/16/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone?


First thing I thought about when I saw youPhone was youTube... it
seems a bit to obvious, sorry.
__
Marc-Olivier Barre.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts - unleash

2007-07-16 Thread Eric Smith
Unleash your phone.


Original Message Shawn Rutledge on Mon-16-Jul 07  8:24PM
 A consumer ad campaign is NOT the place to push the free as in beer vs
 free as in speech argument. The phrase free phone already means the
 opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move on.
 
 Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The
 Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know.
 

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts - unleash

2007-07-16 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen

On 7/16/07, Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Unleash your phone.


Neo 1973 : phone - and more
OpenMoko : not just a phone
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Norway

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts - unleash

2007-07-16 Thread Giles Jones


On 16 Jul 2007, at 22:13, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:


On 7/16/07, Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Unleash your phone.


Neo 1973 : phone - and more
OpenMoko : not just a phone


Neo 1973 - The phone you truly own.



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community