Re: [QtExtended] Git online
Is this meaning that you are dropping http://git.karadog.net/qt-extended-improved.git ? On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Franky Van Liedekerke liede...@telenet.be wrote: Hi all, I forked the tree of and I've put all my changes online so far: http://github.com/liedekef/qtmoko/tree/master My current image is based on this code (except the screenshot app isn't in my binary release yet, I'm going to take this in as well next time I build it). I've also made another change that fixes the problem where you can't click on a OK or Cancel button in some dialog boxes. But I haven't put it online yet (not a really big thing). Now on to the next problem: it seems people don't get the gsm to register anymore after switching from Airplane mode. Needs testing and investigating, I will take this on. Franky ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community -- Fabio A Locati Home: Segrate, Milan, Italy (GMT +1) Phone: +39-328-3799681 MSN/Jabber/E-Mail: fabioloc...@gmail.com PGP Key: 9EF6 3C79 F6DF 76CD 770A 43A1 DCCB 415C 9656 3334 Envolved in: KDE, OpenStreetMap, Ubuntu, Wikimedia ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [QtExtended] Git online
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:47:59 +0200 Fabio Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com wrote: Is this meaning that you are dropping http://git.karadog.net/qt-extended-improved.git ? no, it does not. I've based my git on that of Radek, and Radek gets his from Filip and Karadog. It's all connected :-) Consider mine as alpha, Radeks as beta and Karadog as production :-) Not exactly true, but it helps. Once Karadog switches to 2.6.28 his and Radeks git will probably merge completely. And if Radek pulls in all my changes, then mine is obsolete as well. Franky ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [QtExtended] Git online
I see :) It would be really cool if there would be only one repository with different branches :) (and maybe a little bit more clear for the n00bs like me ;)) On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Franky Van Liedekerke liede...@telenet.be wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:47:59 +0200 Fabio Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com wrote: Is this meaning that you are dropping http://git.karadog.net/qt-extended-improved.git ? no, it does not. I've based my git on that of Radek, and Radek gets his from Filip and Karadog. It's all connected :-) Consider mine as alpha, Radeks as beta and Karadog as production :-) Not exactly true, but it helps. Once Karadog switches to 2.6.28 his and Radeks git will probably merge completely. And if Radek pulls in all my changes, then mine is obsolete as well. Franky ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community -- Fabio A Locati Home: Segrate, Milan, Italy (GMT +1) Phone: +39-328-3799681 MSN/Jabber/E-Mail: fabioloc...@gmail.com PGP Key: 9EF6 3C79 F6DF 76CD 770A 43A1 DCCB 415C 9656 3334 Envolved in: KDE, OpenStreetMap, Ubuntu, Wikimedia ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [QtExtended] Git online
Fabio Locati wrote: I see :) It would be really cool if there would be only one repository with different branches :) (and maybe a little bit more clear for the n00bs like me ;)) No it wouldnt be very good. That's the reason why Linux kernel uses GIT and not SVN. Just check this page: http://git.kernel.org/ these are all branches for one single project - linux kernel. It's how GIT works. If there was one central repository then we would need to agree witch patches can go in and people would break others work. Now i just see that person XXX fixed problem YYY and i will merge this to my tree. And if i trust that person i will merge his whole tree. And with github it's really easy to check what everybody did. Check e.g. http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/network You can see how people are branching your tree and that they do changes. And you can pull their changes back to your tree. So this is coordinated effort and it's very different from times when branching meant forking the project (mainly because of disputes between developers). Radek ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [QtExtended] Git online
I see the point ;). On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Radek Polak pson...@seznam.cz wrote: Fabio Locati wrote: I see :) It would be really cool if there would be only one repository with different branches :) (and maybe a little bit more clear for the n00bs like me ;)) No it wouldnt be very good. That's the reason why Linux kernel uses GIT and not SVN. Just check this page: http://git.kernel.org/ these are all branches for one single project - linux kernel. It's how GIT works. If there was one central repository then we would need to agree witch patches can go in and people would break others work. Now i just see that person XXX fixed problem YYY and i will merge this to my tree. And if i trust that person i will merge his whole tree. And with github it's really easy to check what everybody did. Check e.g. http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/network You can see how people are branching your tree and that they do changes. And you can pull their changes back to your tree. So this is coordinated effort and it's very different from times when branching meant forking the project (mainly because of disputes between developers). Radek ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community -- Fabio A Locati Home: Segrate, Milan, Italy (GMT +1) Phone: +39-328-3799681 MSN/Jabber/E-Mail: fabioloc...@gmail.com PGP Key: 9EF6 3C79 F6DF 76CD 770A 43A1 DCCB 415C 9656 3334 Envolved in: KDE, OpenStreetMap, Ubuntu, Wikimedia ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
