Re: BTW could be the protocolls propritary and with the need to pay licence fees? Re: BT Vehicle Profiles

[David Ford]

Some devices don't answer as expected :)

Scott ~ # hcitool scan
Scanning ...
   08:00:28:F3:E1:82   David Ford

Scott ~ # sdptool browse 08:00:28:F3:E1:82
Browsing 08:00:28:F3:E1:82 ...

Scott ~ # sdptool records 08:00:28:F3:E1:82 | grep Name
Service Name: Audio Video Remote Control Profile
Service Name: Voice Gateway
Service Name: Voice Gateway
Service Name: Serial Port
Service Name: Dial-up Networking

-david

Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:

Dnia wtorek, 23 stycznia 2007 18:46, Robert Michel napisał:

  

But does maybe there any propritry protocolls out there which would
costs licence fees? 



Maybe - we will see when we will get 'sdptool browse' output.

BTW.. Duncan: please send full output of this command rather - I remind 
that some devices use misc names for services..


  


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: BTW could be the protocolls propritary and with the need to pay licence fees? Re: BT Vehicle Profiles

[Marcin Juszkiewicz]

Dnia wtorek, 23 stycznia 2007 18:46, Robert Michel napisał:

> But does maybe there any propritry protocolls out there which would
> costs licence fees? 

Maybe - we will see when we will get 'sdptool browse' output.

BTW.. Duncan: please send full output of this command rather - I remind 
that some devices use misc names for services..

-- 
JID: hrw-jabber.org
OpenEmbedded developer/consultant

  I don't know. I don't care. And it doesn't make any difference.



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community