Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread julien cubizolles
Le mardi 26 août 2008 à 15:24 +0200, arne anka a écrit :
> > I don't think so :
> 
> did you compare the files?
> i gather the naming derives from the gps location data, thus the file  
> names for the same areas should be the same regardless of the format being  
> different.
> similar names are not sufficient, as said above -- compare the files  
> (identify -verbose 5638.png)

diff doesn't show any difference


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread Alexey Kurochkin
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 15:44 +0200, Jelle De Loecker wrote:
> Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there 
> would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?
> 
> If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they 
> both save it as a png then it *should* be compatible. Anything else 
> seems way too crazy, no?
> 
So the question is, how to make locations to cache it in the place you
like it to be cached...

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


RE: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread Crane, Matthew

Png's have metadata, but not sure if it's used by the apps.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jelle De
Loecker
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:44 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps


Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there 
would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?

If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they 
both save it as a png then it *should* be compatible. Anything else 
seems way too crazy, no?

arne anka schreef:
>> I don't think so :
>> 
>
> did you compare the files?
> i gather the naming derives from the gps location data, thus the file

> names for the same areas should be the same regardless of the format
being  
> different.
> similar names are not sufficient, as said above -- compare the files  
> (identify -verbose 5638.png)
>   


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread arne anka
> Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there
> would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?

i wouldn't know -- i don't use locations.
but why shouldn't there be _no_ difference?

> If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they
> both save it as a png then it *should* be compatible. Anything else
> seems way too crazy, no?

how would i know? someone suggested there's a difference and the  
questioner did apparenetly no other check than comparing directory  
structures and file names.
so, to sort the issue out what's left is comparing the actual images,  
don't you think?

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread Jelle De Loecker
Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there 
would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?

If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they 
both save it as a png then it *should* be compatible. Anything else 
seems way too crazy, no?

arne anka schreef:
>> I don't think so :
>> 
>
> did you compare the files?
> i gather the naming derives from the gps location data, thus the file  
> names for the same areas should be the same regardless of the format being  
> different.
> similar names are not sufficient, as said above -- compare the files  
> (identify -verbose 5638.png)
>   


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread arne anka
> I don't think so :

did you compare the files?
i gather the naming derives from the gps location data, thus the file  
names for the same areas should be the same regardless of the format being  
different.
similar names are not sufficient, as said above -- compare the files  
(identify -verbose 5638.png)

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread Michele Renda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

1. There is not standard for offiline map archiving, so why be surprised
if some open programs use a their format to archive data?

The important is that the way how they archive the maps is full open and
fully documented.


2. Google maps are not yours and you must to use it according their
license: and its license don't permit to do a lot of nice things.

Michele Renda


Nishit Dave wrote:
> We love the choice Linux offers.  Yeah.  That is what keeps us going
> on.  Would it not be better to use googlemaps wherever made possible by
> GPRS?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIs+98SIAU/I6SkT0RAh6UAJ46Grnuy1YM7FM45GnUk4WFix6QCgCgpPWL
3tC+n/ey24LGQXYcl5tyrXU=
=3nBm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread julien cubizolles
Le mardi 26 août 2008 à 13:30 +0200, Michele Renda a écrit :

> The maps used by locations, are vectioral maps?

> > 
> > from what i can tell, locations stores the maps in it's own format, 
> > which is not compatible with tango, which directly uses the png files 
> > supplied by osm:


I don't think so :

Locations :
ls /tmp/diversity-maps/osm/14/8295/
5635.png  5636.png  5637.png  5638.png


TangoGPS 
ls /home/root/Maps/OSM/14/8295/ ()
5632.png  5634.png  5636.png  5638.png
5633.png  5635.png  5637.png  5639.png

diff /home/root/Maps/OSM/14/8295/5638.png 
/tmp/diversity-maps/osm/14/8295/5638.png

Maybe copying the maps from TangoGPS to /tmp/diversity-maps/ would work,
without the need for packing them with om-locations-map-pack.




___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread Nishit Dave
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Michele Renda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The maps used by locations, are vectioral maps?
>
> Thank you
> Michele Renda
>
> robin paulson wrote:
> > julien cubizolles wrote:
> >> Would it be possible for TangGPS and Locations to share osm maps ? If
> >> not, where does Locations store its (I'd like to backup them in case of
> >> flashing)
> >>
> >
> > from what i can tell, locations stores the maps in it's own format,
> > which is not compatible with tango, which directly uses the png files
> > supplied by osm:
> >
>

We love the choice Linux offers.  Yeah.  That is what keeps us going on.
Would it not be better to use googlemaps wherever made possible by GPRS?
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread Michele Renda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

The maps used by locations, are vectioral maps?

Thank you
Michele Renda

robin paulson wrote:
> julien cubizolles wrote:
>> Would it be possible for TangGPS and Locations to share osm maps ? If
>> not, where does Locations store its (I'd like to backup them in case of
>> flashing)
>>
> 
> from what i can tell, locations stores the maps in it's own format, 
> which is not compatible with tango, which directly uses the png files 
> supplied by osm:
> 
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Om2008.8_Locations#Create_Offline_Maps
> 
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIs+lOSIAU/I6SkT0RApusAJ9N0R14KnbdNxNc37mJCyghQcGqIwCdHHpn
P/4lzXcWe46aKqXa8TRXP/w=
=aCDz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread robin paulson
julien cubizolles wrote:
> Would it be possible for TangGPS and Locations to share osm maps ? If
> not, where does Locations store its (I'd like to backup them in case of
> flashing)
> 

from what i can tell, locations stores the maps in it's own format, 
which is not compatible with tango, which directly uses the png files 
supplied by osm:

http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Om2008.8_Locations#Create_Offline_Maps

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


TangoGPS and Locations maps

2008-08-26 Thread julien cubizolles
Would it be possible for TangGPS and Locations to share osm maps ? If
not, where does Locations store its (I'd like to backup them in case of
flashing)


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community