atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread cdr
> And portable thermonuclear bomb. Just in case. (Well, phone is already
> hand interface to several orbital atomic clocks, isn't it?)

the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,

to receive the one in Colorado (or Hawaii, 3330 in Canada..), youd need some 
chip like Si4735

http://www.silabs.com/public/documents/marcom_doc/mcoll/Broadcast/Radio_Tuners/en/Si473x_Presentation.pdf


their doc shows ipods, phones, and handheld PCs.

has anyone besides the DSP-Rado people actually put this in _any_ product, let 
alone a phone?


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread Ilja O.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:26 PM, cdr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And portable thermonuclear bomb. Just in case. (Well, phone is already
>> hand interface to several orbital atomic clocks, isn't it?)
>
> the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,
>


But why there are no clocks at the orbit? They could be useful enough.
E.g. if there are several of them each on predefined geostationary
orbit we could do lots of useful things with them! For example, we
could prove that general relativity indeed exists (although ionosphere
would likely to spoil party at some degree).

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread Federico Lorenzi
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Ilja O. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:26 PM, cdr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> And portable thermonuclear bomb. Just in case. (Well, phone is already
>>> hand interface to several orbital atomic clocks, isn't it?)
>>
>> the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,
>>
>
>
> But why there are no clocks at the orbit? They could be useful enough.
> E.g. if there are several of them each on predefined geostationary
> orbit we could do lots of useful things with them! For example, we
> could prove that general relativity indeed exists (although ionosphere
> would likely to spoil party at some degree).
Huh, I'm a little confused about whats being spoken about here, but
the GPS satellites are effectively giant orbiting atomic clocks, its
the basis of GPS.

Cheers,
Federico

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


RE: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread Tim Newsom
I have one (or something equivalent) in my watch (Casio Pathfinder Wave
Ceptor). It synchronizes the time of my watch every night at midnight.
/shrug

--Tim

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cdr
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 11:26 AM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

> And portable thermonuclear bomb. Just in case. (Well, phone is already
> hand interface to several orbital atomic clocks, isn't it?)

the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,

to receive the one in Colorado (or Hawaii, 3330 in Canada..), youd need some
chip like Si4735

http://www.silabs.com/public/documents/marcom_doc/mcoll/Broadcast/Radio_Tune
rs/en/Si473x_Presentation.pdf


their doc shows ipods, phones, and handheld PCs.

has anyone besides the DSP-Rado people actually put this in _any_ product,
let alone a phone?


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread polz
On Sunday 01 June 2008 21:33:15 Ilja O. wrote:

> But why there are no clocks at the orbit? They could be useful enough.
> E.g. if there are several of them each on predefined geostationary
> orbit we could do lots of useful things with them! For example, we
> could prove that general relativity indeed exists (although ionosphere
> would likely to spoil party at some degree).
>

Or you could add a radio transmitter to each of the clocks in lower, almost 
circular orbits, and then use the differences between the times recieved from 
multiple orbiting atomic clocks to pinpoint your locations. You'd need a lot 
of them, though, probably something like 24 clocks in 3 orbital planes. OK, 
maybe you could get by with 21, if you beleived you don't need any spares.

But naah, that would never work ;>.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread Philippe Guillebert

cdr wrote:

the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,


Hey,

According to wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS ), every GPS 
satellite carries an atomic clock, providing every receiver on earth 
with really precise clock. The radio clock systems you describe are 
different and kinda useless when you have GPS onboard.


As an engineer I'm stunned by the level of performance achieved of the 
GPS system : the description of Einstein's relativity compensation on 
the WP article is really scary :)



--
Phyce


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread AVee
On Sunday 01 June 2008 21:33, Ilja O. wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:26 PM, cdr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> And portable thermonuclear bomb. Just in case. (Well, phone is already
> >> hand interface to several orbital atomic clocks, isn't it?)
> >
> > the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,
>
> But why there are no clocks at the orbit? They could be useful enough.
> E.g. if there are several of them each on predefined geostationary
> orbit we could do lots of useful things with them! For example, we
> could prove that general relativity indeed exists (although ionosphere
> would likely to spoil party at some degree).

You could actually use it to calculate your position anywhere on the surface 
of the earth. Lets call it Global Positioning System (GPS). 

Really, what you describe here is exactly what GPS does, and you can indeed 
use GPS to get an acurate time...

AVee

-- 
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread Ilja O.
> Huh, I'm a little confused about whats being spoken about here, but
> the GPS satellites are effectively giant orbiting atomic clocks, its
> the basis of GPS.
>


> Hey,
>
> According to wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS ), every GPS 
> satellite carries an atomic clock, providing every receiver on earth with 
> really precise clock. The radio clock systems
> you describe are different and kinda useless when you have GPS onboard.
>
> As an engineer I'm stunned by the level of performance achieved of the GPS 
> system : the description of Einstein's relativity compensation on the WP 
> article is really scary :)

Doh, people. You've spoiled all the fun! :(

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-01 Thread Arne Kristian Jansen

Federico Lorenzi skrev:

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Ilja O. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:26 PM, cdr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


And portable thermonuclear bomb. Just in case. (Well, phone is already
hand interface to several orbital atomic clocks, isn't it?)


the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,

  

But why there are no clocks at the orbit? They could be useful enough.
E.g. if there are several of them each on predefined geostationary
orbit we could do lots of useful things with them! For example, we
could prove that general relativity indeed exists (although ionosphere
would likely to spoil party at some degree).


Huh, I'm a little confused about whats being spoken about here, but
the GPS satellites are effectively giant orbiting atomic clocks, its
the basis of GPS.

Cheers,
Federico

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
  

Indeed they are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System
(under Simplified method of operation).

And if the satellites did not take the relativity theory into account, 
they would be useless. The accuracy would be awful.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Relativity

Arne K

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: atomic clock / radio-receiver chip

2008-06-02 Thread Rodolphe Ortalo
IHMO, Doris and Poséidon precision is also pretty astounding, albeit not
so well-known ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DORIS_(geodesy) .

Rodolphe

Le dimanche 01 juin 2008 à 23:04 +0200, Philippe Guillebert a écrit :
> cdr wrote:
> > the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,
> 
> Hey,
> 
> According to wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS ), every GPS 
> satellite carries an atomic clock, providing every receiver on earth 
> with really precise clock. The radio clock systems you describe are 
> different and kinda useless when you have GPS onboard.
> 
> As an engineer I'm stunned by the level of performance achieved of the 
> GPS system : the description of Einstein's relativity compensation on 
> the WP article is really scary :)
> 
> 


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community