Re: project customers

2010-04-19 Thread Vibhav Sharma
On Saturday 17 April 2010 11:49 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
 http://www.google.pt/search?q=olpc+tablet
 It's would be a real killer if it has a reflexive screen like XO-1 and
 XO-1.5
* low energy requirements when backlight is off
* visible even with direct sunlight
* color! (well, I don't know if reflexive mode can support it, in
 current XO's it can't
Seen the NotionInk Adam. Just google it. Specially check out videos.

Regards,
Vibhav Sharma

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-19 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Em 19-04-2010 13:49, Vibhav Sharma escreveu:
 On Saturday 17 April 2010 11:49 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
 http://www.google.pt/search?q=olpc+tablet
 It's would be a real killer if it has a reflexive screen like XO-1 and
 XO-1.5
* low energy requirements when backlight is off
* visible even with direct sunlight
* color! (well, I don't know if reflexive mode can support it, in
 current XO's it can't
 Seen the NotionInk Adam. Just google it. Specially check out videos.

Seemed interesting until I read it uses NVidia Tigra. Not anymore.


Rui

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-19 Thread Kosa
Al Johnson escribió:
 On Sunday 18 April 2010, Juergen Schinker wrote:
 won't fit on the bike, but I would have his little brother for that. :)
 Ha why should it not fit on a Bike? Show me how you safely mount the
 little brother on your bike! I still haven't found a usable solution.
 
 I made a mount using polymorph (low-melting plastic similar to nylon) while 
 others have made them by bending sheet plastics. There are photos in the 
 wiki. 
 The safe mount is the easy part. The hard part is the shade to make it 
 readable in the sun. A transreflective screen would really have helped with 
 this.

http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Biking
http://andre.web-yard.de/blog/2008/08/03/neo-freerunner-rocks-hard-rides-free/
http://blog.printf.net/articles/2008/08/11/an-openmoko-bike-ride

cheers!

Kosa

-Un mundo mejor es posible -

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-18 Thread Juergen Schinker

 won't fit on the bike, but I would have his little brother for that. :)
 

Ha why should it not fit on a Bike? Show me how you safely mount the 
little brother on your bike! I still haven't found a usable solution.

Juergen

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-18 Thread Al Johnson
On Sunday 18 April 2010, Juergen Schinker wrote:
  won't fit on the bike, but I would have his little brother for that. :)
 
 Ha why should it not fit on a Bike? Show me how you safely mount the
 little brother on your bike! I still haven't found a usable solution.

I made a mount using polymorph (low-melting plastic similar to nylon) while 
others have made them by bending sheet plastics. There are photos in the wiki. 
The safe mount is the easy part. The hard part is the shade to make it 
readable in the sun. A transreflective screen would really have helped with 
this.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-18 Thread Kosa


Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) escribió:
 On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 02:18:45 +0200 Bernd Prünster bernd.pruens...@gmail.com
 said:
 
 ever heard of the touchbook?!

I had not, but it looks great. I'll do some reading 'couse it looks very
much like the device I was talking about. 299 or 399 + 29 for gps usb
dongle + 80 of 3g seems a reasonable price to me.
 
 or joojoo... or one of the 1894 mee too ipad clones coming out (varying from
 arm based to x86 based). there is no room for a freerunner core based pad... -
 pushing that many pixels means more grunt. the gta02 already couldnt handle
 what it had. by a large margin. just buy one of these me-too pads and fidddle
 with it. hell if tangogps is the killer app - does an open os matter? 

Come on Raster, you know open os matters a lot. I didn't say tangogps is
the only good app, I just said a bigger screen would be great for gps
apps, as well as for lots of other apps.

And I think there is  a lot of space for a Freerunner open pad based if
we talk about cutomers if you fix the already known bugs. Museums, cars,
schools, etc, etc, etc. This is about project customers, right?

Kosa

- Un mundo mejor es posible -



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-17 Thread rixed
-[ Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:46:28AM -0300, Werner Almesberger ]
 I'd worry a lot more about GUI and applications than about any bit
 of hardware.

Agreed, and iPad imitators are probably going to discover once again that 
software is a
very important component that can not be copied as easily as the hardware.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-17 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Em 16-04-2010 23:02, Kosa escreveu:
 I ain't no expert on this, but since iPad is being a succesful mobil
 device, we could give a chance for a BIGGER Freerunner. Of course iPad
 won't sell as many pices as the iPhone has, but 400k seems good for a
 start. There's a huge market for the big touchscreen devices.

There is a project for such a pad at the OLPC. Joining the effort seems
like the wisest choice, to me.


http://www.google.pt/search?q=olpc+tablet

It's would be a real killer if it has a reflexive screen like XO-1 and
XO-1.5
  * low energy requirements when backlight is off
  * visible even with direct sunlight
  * color! (well, I don't know if reflexive mode can support it, in
current XO's it can't)

Add to it new Comix/Evince/etc... interfaces oriented to touch screens,
and you'll have a huge success if it's cheap, so featureful and open.

Rui

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-16 Thread Kosa
I ain't no expert on this, but since iPad is being a succesful mobil
device, we could give a chance for a BIGGER Freerunner. Of course iPad
won't sell as many pices as the iPhone has, but 400k seems good for a
start. There's a huge market for the big touchscreen devices.

What about trying to do some changes here and there to put a bigger
screen (and a much bigger battery) on it. Most common linux apps would
fit on that. Debian works great on the FR right know, and a bigger
screen might be a killer spec 'couse almost every app would run with no
changes needed.

As I said, I ain't no expert, but you take glamo off, fix #1024, get a
bigger screen and battery and leave everithing else as it is and you
have a tremendous chance of succes. I would just add stereo speakers :p
 as in Neo 1973

AFAIK tangogps is THE killer app on the Freerunner, and it would be
great to have a bigger screen for a gps device. It could even fit as a
co-pilot for the car, as gps, phone, music, movies  news player. It
won't fit on the bike, but I would have his little brother for that. :)

We might face the 3g problem, but AFAIR just one of the 3 iPad models
includes 3g, so it is not a most. Not even for GTA03 nor GTA02-Core

I guess a bigger device is easier to build BTW.

Just a thought.

Kosa

- Un mundo mejor es posible -


Werner Almesberger escribió:
 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 if it's hard to communicate - you don't have a sales point.
 
 Yup, that's why I wouldn't belabour that angle for now. Whether and
 when the time for selling on open software alone will come depends
 on how constrained people feel with the non-open choices, and how
 many indirect benefits they get.
 
 For now, I'll be happy with the niche of project customers who need
 to tweak the hardware or who already understand why they cannot
 afford a closed system.
 
 That said, such a phone wouldn't have to be free from appeal to the
 mass market. It should definitely be as attractive as possible, but
 within reason.
 
 sure - but it seems those project customers want to feed off a stable supply
 line
 
 Stability is indeed crucial. I hope to be able to compensate with
 flexibility what we lack in sheer momentum. E.g., if you get, say,
 Motorola to make a design for you, and then Motorola decides to
 shut down or sell off that business unit, then you're left with
 pretty much nothing, no matter what your contracts say.
 
 With an open design, no mattern what happens with the makers of it,
 you still have the design - down to the last detail - and most of
 the information needed to produce it. You may still fail to recover
 from a breakdown in your supply, but your chances are vastly better.
 
 Also, since the supply is likely to be spread over multiple
 companies and individuals (who, in the Open world, enjoy a great
 deal of mobility) catastrophic failures that wipe out everything
 are less likely.
 
 Now, it remains to be seen whether prospective project customers
 will agree with these arguments or whether they prefer to stick
 with the traditional view and try to partner with companies that
 are too big to fail.
 
 In terms of numbers, I think cost levels out pretty well already
 at only a few kunits. If you're competing on the last 5%, you're
 already in the wrong game.
 
 i know that to you, or to many
 freedom advocates all this fancy eyecandy, sexy design, high end components
 etc. seems all irrelevant
 
 Heh, yet here I am, still using my sleek little Samsung X-830 as
 my daily phone, while keeping the ugly pucks in the lab :)
 
 The thing with bleeding edge components is that they cost you a
 lot (in various ways) at very little gain. Yes, you may get that
 extra push for today's fashionable effect, but by the time you
 hit the market, fashion will have changed. Better find your own
 style that doesn't come from the manuals of the Gigahertz war :-)
 
 - Werner
 
 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-16 Thread Werner Almesberger
Kosa wrote:
 I ain't no expert on this, but since iPad is being a succesful mobil
 device, we could give a chance for a BIGGER Freerunner.

The joy of the Open Design Hardware concept - anyone can design their
own mutant :)

 There's a huge market for the big touchscreen devices.

Let's see how the Newt^H^H^H^HiPad goes. Wouldn't be the first device
to end up in the gadget graveyard after the novelty effect wears off.

 I guess a bigger device is easier to build BTW.

Having a larger case gives you more freedom, yes. Designing it as an
offspring of a phone would make it attractive to use much of the same
technology, though. After all, you've already debugged it, know where
to get the parts, etc., so there's probably little to optimize from
the engineering point of view.

A larger screen may be a problem, though, if it also comes with a
larger resolution. The larger the resolution, the more pixels the
poor CPU has to push and the more memory bus bandwidth is eaten up by
refreshing the screen.

Of course, 640x480 would still look quite tolerable at, say, 6 (133
dpi, like the original Eee PC), so you may be able to avoid this
issue - and be able to use cheap screens.

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-16 Thread Bernd Prünster
ever heard of the touchbook?!

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 02:18:45 +0200 Bernd Prünster bernd.pruens...@gmail.com
said:

 ever heard of the touchbook?!

or joojoo... or one of the 1894 mee too ipad clones coming out (varying from
arm based to x86 based). there is no room for a freerunner core based pad... -
pushing that many pixels means more grunt. the gta02 already couldnt handle
what it had. by a large margin. just buy one of these me-too pads and fidddle
with it. hell if tangogps is the killer app - does an open os matter? as long
as you can compile it and install it (toouchbook is there already for that -
and it's open. not the schematics - though if you look carefully its actually a
slightly modified beagleboard - so design is open actually), and os is open.
the other me-too's on x86 will be pretty much just as open as any other
netbook (give or take) - and yes. we know. imgtec, sgx, closed gpu. that's the
case everywhere. no news there and no solution to is unless you design your own
gpu... good luck. :))

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-16 Thread Bernd Prünster
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
 On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 02:18:45 +0200 Bernd Prünster bernd.pruens...@gmail.com
 said:

   
 ever heard of the touchbook?!
 

 or joojoo... or one of the 1894 mee too ipad clones coming out (varying from
 arm based to x86 based). there is no room for a freerunner core based pad... -
 pushing that many pixels means more grunt. the gta02 already couldnt handle
 what it had. by a large margin. just buy one of these me-too pads and fidddle
 with it. hell if tangogps is the killer app - does an open os matter? as 
 long
 as you can compile it and install it (toouchbook is there already for that -
 and it's open. not the schematics - though if you look carefully its actually 
 a
 slightly modified beagleboard - so design is open actually), and os is open.
 the other me-too's on x86 will be pretty much just as open as any other
 netbook (give or take) - and yes. we know. imgtec, sgx, closed gpu. that's the
 case everywhere. no news there and no solution to is unless you design your 
 own
 gpu... good luck. :))

   
+1
the beagleboard (omap3550) has quite a nice amount of horsepower, it can 
to 720p, has nice dsp which is quite well supported, and the folks at ai 
and the community around the touchbook are playing around to get 
accelerated composing working thanks to opengl ES an thanks to the wokr 
nokia did on the n900 (omap3550 again if i'm right).
apart from that casual computing, littel surfing a little office work 
and thanks to powerVR you can also watch videos quite nicely thanks to 
mplayer hardware accel, but the system still hat beta quality, so i can 
just hope they iron the remaining bugs out in time. i'm not paid to 
write that, i just think this might be an interesting device for 
freerunner users...

please correct me if i wrote too much junk - it is 4,40 am here

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-16 Thread Werner Almesberger
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 no news there and no solution to is unless you design your own
 gpu... good luck. :))

I'd worry a lot more about GUI and applications than about any bit
of hardware. Pads in one form or another have been around for a
long time. So far, they weren't particularly successful.

The promise of the pad is basically that there are many tasks,
either new but useful (and beyond what a smartphone could do) or
traditionally requiring a laptop, that can be formulated such that
all the interaction they require are a few taps and drags.

Maybe the iPad will be able to do this. Maybe not. We'll see.

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-13 Thread Werner Almesberger
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 if it's hard to communicate - you don't have a sales point.

Yup, that's why I wouldn't belabour that angle for now. Whether and
when the time for selling on open software alone will come depends
on how constrained people feel with the non-open choices, and how
many indirect benefits they get.

For now, I'll be happy with the niche of project customers who need
to tweak the hardware or who already understand why they cannot
afford a closed system.

That said, such a phone wouldn't have to be free from appeal to the
mass market. It should definitely be as attractive as possible, but
within reason.

 sure - but it seems those project customers want to feed off a stable supply
 line

Stability is indeed crucial. I hope to be able to compensate with
flexibility what we lack in sheer momentum. E.g., if you get, say,
Motorola to make a design for you, and then Motorola decides to
shut down or sell off that business unit, then you're left with
pretty much nothing, no matter what your contracts say.

With an open design, no mattern what happens with the makers of it,
you still have the design - down to the last detail - and most of
the information needed to produce it. You may still fail to recover
from a breakdown in your supply, but your chances are vastly better.

Also, since the supply is likely to be spread over multiple
companies and individuals (who, in the Open world, enjoy a great
deal of mobility) catastrophic failures that wipe out everything
are less likely.

Now, it remains to be seen whether prospective project customers
will agree with these arguments or whether they prefer to stick
with the traditional view and try to partner with companies that
are too big to fail.

In terms of numbers, I think cost levels out pretty well already
at only a few kunits. If you're competing on the last 5%, you're
already in the wrong game.

 i know that to you, or to many
 freedom advocates all this fancy eyecandy, sexy design, high end components
 etc. seems all irrelevant

Heh, yet here I am, still using my sleek little Samsung X-830 as
my daily phone, while keeping the ugly pucks in the lab :)

The thing with bleeding edge components is that they cost you a
lot (in various ways) at very little gain. Yes, you may get that
extra push for today's fashionable effect, but by the time you
hit the market, fashion will have changed. Better find your own
style that doesn't come from the manuals of the Gigahertz war :-)

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-12 Thread The Rasterman
On 09 Apr 2010 12:37:00 +0200 openm...@pulster.de (Christoph Pulster) said:

  Perhaps I should clarify that I don't mean to make fun of your
  situation. We're all in the same boat here.
 
 No problem Werner, all your optinions and comments are very welcome.
 As you already said, companiess who built a solution based on the  
 Openmoko need a reliable product AND a reliable company behind.
 The product, Freerunner, had a lot severe bugs (GPS not working, GSM  
 buzzing, #1024 suspend problems). Also after fixing this with new  
 revisions and third partys (Dr.Nikolaus), the product is not ready to  
 compete in the market. Very poor battery life to mention just one  
 serious no-go.
 
 The company Openmoko Inc. missed to give customers a reliable support  
 and long-term concept. The open idea stopped behind the doors, no info  
 about stock availability, spare parts supply etc.
 CEO Sean is an visionary, not a sales guy. Steve Mosher's part of the  
 game was not evident. (BTW, what is the status of Steve according Qi ?)
 
 
 I had a project asking for 2500 units as a first order only.
 Openmoko Inc. failed to provide this customer a infrastructure.

this is the problem with phones. the big boys are beginng to get it - but for
them 2500 units is what they do for a verification run - and then throw out.
they don't get up out of bed in the morning for a request for 2500 units. :)
they will want at least 2 or 3 zeros added to that to even give you the time of
day. openmoko never made it to be big enough to continue - and ye once you get
big enough, the kind of thing you talk about no longer make business sense (as
you are busy shopping around to telcos who will order millions of devices).
catch 22 :-S

 I can confirm sold units worldwide is 20.000 maximum.
 which is a very poor result and can not give a living for anyone.
 The game openmoko was only possible with the financial injection of  
 FIC. the funds are gone, the Wikireader is an anachronistic product and  
 will not give any cashback.
 
 Not to misunderstand, the game opensource is just starting.
 if you need to, remember Openmoko as a early hero.
 
 
 Christoph
 
 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-12 Thread Werner Almesberger
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
 In business strategy planning it is quite common to separate e.g.  
 consumer, project, service, solution business types and  
 markets because they have quite different requirements and attitudes  

Yes, I was familiar with the concept but I didn't know the term
project customer. I used terms like integrator and similar,
which cover only part of the activities. Project customer is
much more precise. I'm happy I finally found the word for them :)

 At least one visitor during our presence at the SYSTEMS 2008 fair  
 expressed he is interested in 6 units [...]

Hmm, if we assume a contribution towards RD and QA of about USD
50 per device, that would be 3 millions. A while ago, Maddog and I
did a rough estimate of how much it would cost to make a new phone,
similar in style to gta02-core, but with updated components, etc.

We came up with a cost of about 2.5 millions before production (but
including transfer, certification, etc.). This visitor may be one of
those who would have enough resources to have their own design made
(*), but may not realize it.

(*) With the proviso that modules are used for most or all the RF
parts. A design with RF components at the chip level would add
difficulties and increase development cost.

 So for successful project business, one must either provide a  
 product that is available for 5-7 years or at least a consistent  
 roadmap/upgrade plan.

I think either is very difficult to provide for an entire device
using mobile phone technology. But I think that much of the push
towards technological change can be buffered by having an Open
design - one may not be able to avoid changing the bare metal, but
interfaces and the software layers above the hardware can live as
long as anyone cares to keep them alive.

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-12 Thread Werner Almesberger
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 day. openmoko never made it to be big enough to continue - and ye once you get
 big enough, the kind of thing you talk about no longer make business sense (as
 you are busy shopping around to telcos who will order millions of devices).
 catch 22 :-S

This is where an Open hardware design can help :-) No matter which
role you play, you always have the purchase power of the whole group
behind you.

Openmoko Inc. found many doors open that would normally be closed
for such a flyspeck of a company, because it promised manufacturers
access to the Linux market.

The Open hardware design also increases the scalability - the small
garage company that makes 100 customized phones for the local
shopping mall has access to the same design resources and can have
access to much of the production resources as the largest member of
the group.

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:19:43 -0300 Werner Almesberger wer...@openmoko.org
said:

 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
  day. openmoko never made it to be big enough to continue - and ye once you
  get big enough, the kind of thing you talk about no longer make business
  sense (as you are busy shopping around to telcos who will order millions of
  devices). catch 22 :-S
 
 This is where an Open hardware design can help :-) No matter which
 role you play, you always have the purchase power of the whole group
 behind you.
 
 Openmoko Inc. found many doors open that would normally be closed
 for such a flyspeck of a company, because it promised manufacturers
 access to the Linux market.

too late for that. the others are in on the game. and now being open enough
is all that's needed. window of opportunity for om and the likes has closed -
or at the best is very close to closed.

 The Open hardware design also increases the scalability - the small
 garage company that makes 100 customized phones for the local
 shopping mall has access to the same design resources and can have
 access to much of the production resources as the largest member of
 the group.

depends on who is buying the units to make it scale - if it's a telco, chances
are they want it far from being open - that includes the hw design. chaning
that doesn't come from a small company like om screaming. it comes from someone
big enough to change the rules and power balance so its you have to come to us
and beg for a phone - then we set the rules. apple are in such a position
right now for example. :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-12 Thread Werner Almesberger
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 too late for that. the others are in on the game. and now being open enough
 is all that's needed. window of opportunity for om and the likes has closed -
 or at the best is very close to closed.

I think the advantage is still there, it's just harder to communicate.
Also in this regard, Open Design Hardware helps: you still don't get
anything like this from the now open players.

And from what I've heard and keep on hearing, there are lots of project
customers who want to modify the hardware. They often also have the
engineering resources to perform their changes. But also doing the rest
of the phone would be too much for them.

The Open phones would be sort of a reference designs created by the
Open hardware development process, but not the one and only results.

 depends on who is buying the units to make it scale - if it's a telco, chances
 are they want it far from being open - that includes the hw design. chaning
 that doesn't come from a small company like om screaming.

A small telco may be happy enough to finally be able to brand their
products, too. I wouldn't try to deal with large telcos for now.
Don't sleep with a girl who eats more than your own weight for
breakfast :-)

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:52:03 -0300 Werner Almesberger wer...@openmoko.org
said:

 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
  too late for that. the others are in on the game. and now being open
  enough is all that's needed. window of opportunity for om and the likes
  has closed - or at the best is very close to closed.
 
 I think the advantage is still there, it's just harder to communicate.
 Also in this regard, Open Design Hardware helps: you still don't get
 anything like this from the now open players.

if it's hard to communicate - you don't have a sales point. if someone is to
spend money on something they need to be able to be told a simple thing and
get it and go aha! that's just what we want!. until the market is actively
seeking the kind of freedom you want to provide (schematics, cad design, 100%
open source os in all ways), you are the guy in the street with a sign i have
anchovie flavored chocolate. you really want some. the problem here is the
market is happy with good enough. at least the market that buys millions of
units. :) (that's why i mean by market btw - ie the mass market. of course
niches will exist!) :)

 And from what I've heard and keep on hearing, there are lots of project
 customers who want to modify the hardware. They often also have the
 engineering resources to perform their changes. But also doing the rest
 of the phone would be too much for them.
 
 The Open phones would be sort of a reference designs created by the
 Open hardware development process, but not the one and only results.

sure - but it seems those project customers want to feed off a stable supply
line - and for that you need a mass market to consume it to have that
production and thus supply line run to keep costs down, ensure basic quality of
build, design, components etc. (thus why i focus on mass market).

  depends on who is buying the units to make it scale - if it's a telco,
  chances are they want it far from being open - that includes the hw design.
  chaning that doesn't come from a small company like om screaming.
 
 A small telco may be happy enough to finally be able to brand their
 products, too. I wouldn't try to deal with large telcos for now.
 Don't sleep with a girl who eats more than your own weight for
 breakfast :-)

hahahahahahahahahhaha! :) maybe - the the small telcos are competing with
bigger ones. the big ones get to attract customers with oooh we have an
iphone! or check out this droid. branding is a nice to have... *IF* you can
match the competition. you need to get there first before small telco might
consider it. remember telco is trying to sell these phones to average joes -
and those average joes see shiny sexy iphone, then see a freerunner... guess
which one (and which telco) they choose? :) i know that to you, or to many
freedom advocates all this fancy eyecandy, sexy design, high end components
etc. seems all irrelevant to the goal of freedom - and if anything makes it
harder, and you have a point - but that point imho vanishes with the market
realities - to produce enough units to keep cost down, keep production flowing
etc. you need mass market appeal. and that means matching, or beating, the
competition in h i like that for the average joe. that means sexy
swishy animations, beautiful graphics, good screen, responsive touch surface
(capacitive), nice case/design, powerful cpu/gpu to power all the sexiness, 3g,
and then apps and lots of them and so on... you need to at least provide what
people now EXPECT from a phone. yes... even make and receive calls from
reliably from day 1 the phone ships. :)

it's a tough spot. what i see as more viable is making those that already
produce phones, more open, and gradually prying things open. getting schematics
is likely to simply never happen - you are talking different cultures even
within such companies. the hardware sides just don't even want to hear the
arguments. the software sides either get it already (and fight internally
politically, or have tough tradeoffs to make - like making it more open will
make your big customers go away as they can't close it down as easily), or are
beginning to get it. life would be easy if they all already got it and did it.
but... that's not the case. the closest to an open production-level phone today
is the n900 - and it has been a pretty rocky start there.

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-10 Thread Werner Almesberger
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
 We also had many discussions with project customers and basically they  
 were happy with the device. And would prefer it over any consumer  
 oriented device.

Are there actually any stories of project customers whose project
made it past the RD stage and who deployed a reasonably large
number of devices, let's say = 100 ?

I'm not aware of any, and that's bothering me a little, for it
weakens my theory that project customers (I haven't heard this
expression before Christoph used it, but I like it very much)
would be a major market for an Open phone.

It could be that the combination of long-lived problems and a
short-lived product or series just left no window for this to
happen.

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-10 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller

Am 10.04.2010 um 09:56 schrieb Werner Almesberger:

 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
 We also had many discussions with project customers and basically  
 they
 were happy with the device. And would prefer it over any consumer
 oriented device.

 Are there actually any stories of project customers whose project
 made it past the RD stage and who deployed a reasonably large
 number of devices, let's say = 100 ?

 I'm not aware of any, and that's bothering me a little, for it

I am also not aware of any successful large scale project. While the  
Sharp Zaurus did have such projects. The largest real projects with  
Openmokos I have seen were in education (e.g. providing a classroom  
for embedded development training).

 weakens my theory that project customers (I haven't heard this

In business strategy planning it is quite common to separate e.g.  
consumer, project, service, solution business types and  
markets because they have quite different requirements and attitudes  
in respect to quality, reliability, speed, loyality, functionality,  
cost, dependencies, legacy, supply markets etc. So one has to serve  
them differently.

 expression before Christoph used it, but I like it very much)
 would be a major market for an Open phone.

At least one visitor during our presence at the SYSTEMS 2008 fair  
expressed he is interested in 6 units to install special  
encryption software. And, he was looking for an open hardware device  
because he could then 100% prove to his customers (government, police)  
what is inside the device.

 It could be that the combination of long-lived problems and a
 short-lived product or series just left no window for this to
 happen.

Definitively. Such projects usually have 2-3 years planning phase  
(from the idea through convincing management, getting a budget,  
selecting suppliers, negotiating prices, finally making a purchase  
order etc.). And then typically 3-5 years deployment where  
replacement, spare parts etc. must remain available and devices must  
remain compatible to any infrastructure that comes with the project.  
So for successful project business, one must either provide a  
product that is available for 5-7 years or at least a consistent  
roadmap/upgrade plan. This is completely different to a consumer  
market where the buyer just wants the best product available today.  
And then comes back after 2 years and wants to have a new one, most  
likely from a different brand and 100% incompatible.

Look e.g. at settop boxes for cable or IP TV. Although they are  
finally in the hands of consumers, they are deployed through roll-out  
projects by network operators. So the technology of a device must  
match the technology of the network at the time of introduction. Which  
is a constantly moving target and makes it a nightmare for the  
product managers working for a settop box supplier :)

Nikolaus

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-10 Thread Radek Polak
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:

 Definitively. Such projects usually have 2-3 years planning phase
 (from the idea through convincing management, getting a budget,
 selecting suppliers, negotiating prices, finally making a purchase
 order etc.). And then typically 3-5 years deployment where
 replacement, spare parts etc. must remain available and devices must
 remain compatible to any infrastructure that comes with the project.
 So for successful project business, one must either provide a
 product that is available for 5-7 years or at least a consistent
 roadmap/upgrade plan. This is completely different to a consumer
 market where the buyer just wants the best product available today.
 And then comes back after 2 years and wants to have a new one, most
 likely from a different brand and 100% incompatible.

I have to aggree from my own experience. Our company is doing HW and SW for 
Czech Railways. We are still running 600 small 486 devices running MSDOS (we 
had 1200 of them just a year ago). And we are also still developing new SW 
products for these devices.

It is very important that the device is supported for 10+ years in this area. 
It is also important that the operating system and HW is stable and not 
changing under your hands. You install it once and it must work for those 10 
years.

Regards

Radek

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-09 Thread Giovanni
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Christoph Pulster openm...@pulster.dewrote:


 I can confirm sold units worldwide is 20.000 maximum.


Is FreeRunner still in production?
I mean: is there a factory producing any FreeRunners?

best regards,
giovanni
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-09 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller

Am 09.04.2010 um 12:37 schrieb Christoph Pulster:

 Perhaps I should clarify that I don't mean to make fun of your
 situation. We're all in the same boat here.

 No problem Werner, all your optinions and comments are very welcome.
 As you already said, companiess who built a solution based on the
 Openmoko need a reliable product AND a reliable company behind.
 The product, Freerunner, had a lot severe bugs (GPS not working, GSM
 buzzing, #1024 suspend problems). Also after fixing this with new
 revisions and third partys (Dr.Nikolaus), the product is not ready to
 compete in the market. Very poor battery life to mention just one
 serious no-go.

We also had many discussions with project customers and basically they  
were happy with the device. And would prefer it over any consumer  
oriented device.

There have been really interesting projects people have done with  
their Freerunners. Just some I remember:
* one was shot into space (60 km altitude) by DLR
* one was used as the onboard computer for a sudent built racing car
* two have been used in a history museum as visitor guides
* etc.

In my talks, the technical problems or lack of technological  
competitiveness (compare to the rumours of a 960x480 display for the  
next generation iPhone) were rarely a real issue. Most projects just  
need a device that works well enough for them. And is open enough so  
that they can completely install their own software down to the  
bootloader (this is critical for security related projects). Not all  
projects need GPS, not all need a good standby time more than the  
130-140 hours that are now available. And many would have been happy  
with a pure PDA.

But you are completely right in the analysis for the non-technical  
aspects. In marketing, there is the word the Product of a Company is  
everything, not only the Device. I.e. logistics, customer support,  
long term roadmap, customer specific variants etc. are also part of  
the product. And in these categories, project customers did not get  
what they had expected or required. And, the economical crisis did  
postpone and cancel many of the more flexible and innovative projects  
that could withstand such issues.

 The company Openmoko Inc. missed to give customers a reliable support
 and long-term concept. The open idea stopped behind the doors, no  
 info

Exactly.

 about stock availability, spare parts supply etc.

 CEO Sean is an visionary, not a sales guy. Steve Mosher's part of the
 game was not evident. (BTW, what is the status of Steve according  
 Qi ?)

 I had a project asking for 2500 units as a first order only.
 Openmoko Inc. failed to provide this customer a infrastructure.

 I can confirm sold units worldwide is 20.000 maximum.
 which is a very poor result and can not give a living for anyone.
 The game openmoko was only possible with the financial injection of
 FIC. the funds are gone, the Wikireader is an anachronistic product  
 and

If we take 50 employees over 2 years and compare with 20k units sold  
at rougly 300 USD average (with 20% gross margin which is industry  
avarage) one can estimate how much money had to be injected...

 will not give any cashback.

 Not to misunderstand, the game opensource is just starting.
 if you need to, remember Openmoko as a early hero.

Yes, they definitively were early heros.

And currently, we all work on their appreciation. Maybe there will  
come an Open Phoenux and fly again...


Nikolaus



Mobile Office Solutions
by Golden Delicious Computers GmbHCo. KG
Buchenstr. 3
D-82041 Oberhaching
+49-89-54290367
http://www.handheld-linux.com

AG München, HRA 89571
VAT DE253626266
Komplementär:
Golden Delicious Computers Verwaltungs GmbH
Oberhaching, AG München, HRB 16602
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Nikolaus Schaller

Digital Tools for Independent People







___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-09 Thread Benedikt
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 12:37 +0200, Christoph Pulster wrote:

  [snip]
 Not to misunderstand, the game opensource is just starting.
 if you need to, remember Openmoko as a early hero.
 
 

Here I completely agree with you, Christoph.

I personally don't see the FR as a fail. It's more like a success in
that we (the community) have proven an open source phone, while not
perfect yet, is indeed possible.

And while the FR may not live long enough, an open phone OS like SHR,
QTMoko or Debian will run on other devices too, in time.

I think we are just at the beginning, not the end. And I am very proud
to be part of this, even if I don't (yet) have the time to be more
involved :). I don't regret purchasing the FR at all.

 Christoph
 

Cheers,
Benedikt

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: project customers

2010-04-09 Thread Werner Almesberger
Christoph Pulster wrote:
 As you already said, companiess who built a solution based on the  
 Openmoko need a reliable product AND a reliable company behind.

Hmm, I think you're right that there has to be a company that
buffers the customer from the increasingly chaotic (*) inner
layers. However, I'm not sure this company has to be the
manufacturer or owner of the product, nor that there would
have to be just one company in this buffer role.

E.g., I could easily imagine a consortium grouped around an
open design. That's one of the possible directions I see for
the work we've started with gta02-core.

Such a consortium could be much more reliable than a single
company. If someone drops out, others can fill the gap. If the
consortium as a whole falls apart or veers off course, anyone
can pick up the design and continue producing it. You can even
have mobility at the level of individual engineers.

So the product would live as long as there's enough interest in
seeing it live, much as it is with Open Source software.

Also, if we consider project customers, many of them have needs
the current market offerings cannot satisfy, they usually do
have technical competence, and they have some money. What they
don't have is the size and pull to just create the product they
need from scratch.

Now, there are many roles they could play. They could be just
customers. They could take a more proactive role and be part
of such a consortium. Or maybe they're even underestimating
their potential and would actually be able to take the lead in
creating such a product from scratch. They just don't think
they could.

(*) Chaotic, not necessarily because of a lack of structure,
but simply because of the amount of information going
around and because there will invariably be a lot of
horrifying news that don't have much of an impact in the
long run.

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


project customers (was Re: beautiful qt based)

2010-04-08 Thread Werner Almesberger
I wrote:
 So I'm not exactly surprised that you don't have hordes of project
 customers banging at your door, begging for more FreeRunners.

Perhaps I should clarify that I don't mean to make fun of your
situation. We're all in the same boat here.

But I think it's important to be aware that this kind of completely
non-technical issue can disqualify the product for project
customers.

The irony here is that the openness as such would be a very strong
point in favour of something like the FreeRunner, especially for
those with long-term plans, and it's sad that we (as in those who
believe in the ideas behind the Openmoko project) have missed this
opportunity so far.

Of course, where something isn't right, there's also an opportunity
to do better :-)

- Werner

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community