[Compiz] [Bug 830949] Re: [Intel N10 Graphics] Need Compiz' "Copy to Texture" plugin so can display on multi-head layouts bigger than the max GL texture size
re Ara, David and others; if I understand the situation: 1. Hardware has a max texture target of 2048x2048. 2. 1024 wide (internal) + 1280 wide (external) > 2048; so Unity 3D fails, Unity 2D works; error message shown 3. 600 high (internal) + 1024 high (external) <= 2048; so Unity 3D works, Unity 2D works. Nothing shown 4. On *some* N10 systems, somehow the machine ends up setting/enabling the impossible (2) situation, without warning Two questions: a. Is the summary above correct? b. If so, how to cause (4) reliably? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830949 Title: [Intel N10 Graphics] Need Compiz' "Copy to Texture" plugin so can display on multi-head layouts bigger than the max GL texture size To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/830949/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 891657] Re: Unity-3D resizing window to bottom corner activates side-by-side maximise
What appears to be happening is that the side-by-side tiling code is getting activated during resize. My understanding is that the side-by- side option is only supposed to show when a window has been picked up by its title bar and dragged to the left or right edges. In which case the side-by-side being offered during a corner/edge resize would be not correct. ** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891657 Title: Unity-3D resizing window to bottom corner activates side-by-side maximise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/891657/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 851741] Re: Super + D doesn't show desktop as expected
I wonder if this is the difference between Unity and Unity 2D. On Unity 2D Super+d simply shows the launcher. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851741 Title: Super + D doesn't show desktop as expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/851741/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 873553] Re: Double resize following alt-tab
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Neil J. Patel (njpatel) ** Summary changed: - Double resize following alt-tab + Desktop staging PPA: Double resize following alt-tab (u-p-s crash?) ** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) => unity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873553 Title: Desktop staging PPA: Double resize following alt-tab (u-p-s crash?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/873553/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 873553] Re: Double resize following alt-tab
'recordmydesktop' video capture of above. ** Attachment added: "double-resize-on-alt-tab.ogv" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/873553/+attachment/2540668/+files/double-resize-on-alt-tab.ogv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873553 Title: Double resize following alt-tab To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/873553/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 873553] [NEW] Double resize following alt-tab
Public bug reported: This could be transient, but I'm now seeing a double window-resize following each Alt-tab completion. Eg. 1. Alt-tab to move away 2. Alt-tab to move back. What happens: 3. Window raises. 4. Window resizes (local menu appearing briefly) 5. Window resizes second time (global menu appearing again) What should happen: 3–5. Window should raise. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873553 Title: Double resize following alt-tab To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/873553/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 861710] Re: [regression] smspillaz fails to sleep at proper hours, despite solar status
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861710 Title: [regression] smspillaz fails to sleep at proper hours, despite solar status To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/861710/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 857570] [NEW] Compiz crashing kills the currently playing audio track
Public bug reported: Ideally, when Compiz crashes, it should not kill the audio track that is playing in Banshee. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857570 Title: Compiz crashing kills the currently playing audio track To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/857570/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 820266] Re: CTRL+ALT+T doesn't open a terminal anymore
Hadmut: I have filed the issue about Apport and lagging mirrors as bug #845754 now that you've raised it; and subscribed you to it. Hopefully Martin Pitt can have a look into what is happening. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820266 Title: CTRL+ALT+T doesn't open a terminal anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/820266/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 820266] Re: CTRL+ALT+T doesn't open a terminal anymore
According to bug #821505, this is still not fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820266 Title: CTRL+ALT+T doesn't open a terminal anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/820266/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 825230] Re: Re-maximizing a window doesn't correctly maximize it again
Confirmed as not working in Unity-2D at all though. ** Also affects: unity-2d Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825230 Title: Re-maximizing a window doesn't correctly maximize it again To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/825230/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 832643] [NEW] Unity/Compiz uses ~25% CPU with only a Terminal open (power regression)
Public bug reported: Compiz uses a crazy amount of CPU, continiously, even with nothing showing except the Launcher and a terminal: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 11143 sladen20 0 521m 185m 13m S 24 6.2 80:45.20 compiz the side-effect of this is that the machine runs extremely hot, and battery life is impacted. Compiz used less CPU/energy in Ubuntu 11.04 so this is a regression. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: sladen-11.10-upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832643 Title: Unity/Compiz uses ~25% CPU with only a Terminal open (power regression) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/832643/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 828740] [NEW] Unity: External resize padding is borken [regression]
Public bug reported:
Bug #160311 ("Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult")
seems to be back with the change of themeing system.
Application windows are once again very hard to resize, with only the
1-pixel border working.
Ideally the external resize-padding shipped in Ubuntu 11.04 should be
replicated.
** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: light-themes (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: sladen-11.10-upgrade
** Also affects: light-themes (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828740
Title:
Unity: External resize padding is borken [regression]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/828740/+subscriptions
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz
Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 822989] Re: [Oneiric] The CTRL+TAB keybinding of the new window selector conflicts with Firefox's tab switcher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 815643 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815643 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 815643 Ctrl-Tab conflicts with local tab switching -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822989 Title: [Oneiric] The CTRL+TAB keybinding of the new window selector conflicts with Firefox's tab switcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/822989/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 734819] Re: Switcher: Openbve does not appear in Alt-tab window list
Omer, to reproduce: sudo apt-get install openbve openbve & Alt-Tab away from the dialogue; then Alt-Tab back to Openbve What happens: 1. It is impossibly to use Alt-Tab to get back to the Openbve dialogue 2. it is possible to use the Unity Launcher (click the anonymous program called just "panel") 3. There are three-white pips displayed in the Launcher next to "panel"; but only one window shown when clicked. What should happen: 1. Ideally Alt-Tab should work and have Openbve listed as the application at the top of the stack 2. The Unity Launcher should display the icon and Application name 3. Only one pip should be shown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734819 Title: Switcher: Openbve does not appear in Alt-tab window list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/734819/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 762032] Re: alt+tab broken with click-to-focus off
I think in this case, it's clear that there's a bug; it's just not of high-importance for a particular use-case, and it's good to be honest about that. That of course still means that anyone else is welcome to come along, scratch their own itch, track it down and ensure it gets fixed quicker! ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762032 Title: alt+tab broken with click-to-focus off To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/762032/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 771737] Re: unity ALT-tab loses usb-creator once it is installing
I've had this with a few other Apps (vanishes from Alt-Tab, but still in the Launcher). Thanks for pinning it down to something reproducible! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771737 Title: unity ALT-tab loses usb-creator once it is installing ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 387828] Re: ALT+TAB with compiz shows really ugly icons for minimized windows
Sam: how much would it be to just draw icons at their native size. Eg. if the source icon is 32x32 or 48x48 and the available viewport is 128x128 we just draw it tiny in the middle? I think the objection here is the scaling (+ resulting jaggies) itself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387828 Title: ALT+TAB with compiz shows really ugly icons for minimized windows ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 387828] Re: ALT+TAB with compiz shows really ugly icons for minimized windows
Chris: for clarity, are you thinking rescaled icons (to avoid a size difference), or ensuring that we actually have redrawn 128x128 (or whatever) icons specifically at that size. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387828 Title: ALT+TAB with compiz shows really ugly icons for minimized windows ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 758307] Re: compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape
** Summary changed: - compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client + compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape ** Summary changed: - compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape + compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape in PrivateWindow::processMap() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758307 Title: compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape in PrivateWindow::processMap() ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 438868] Re: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend
Conflicts with various cancelled SRUs and newer packages: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/1:0.8.4-0ubuntu15.1 (lucid) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/1:0.8.4-0ubuntu15.2 (lucid) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/1:0.8.4-0ubuntu16 (maverick) Per pitti's advice, I've pushed as '1:0.8.4-0ubuntu15.3'. Please check carefully if there are any regressions. Bob: this is being uploaded to '-proposed', which you will have to have enabled specifically. When/if people confirm that the update works, it can be migrated from '-proposed' to '-updates' which will them be pushed out to most people. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438868 Title: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 750283] Re: Enforce switcher 'bring to front' to avoid seeing the launcher while doing ALT-Tab
Please. No. This fix/workaround to the four-year broken Alt-Tab handling in Compiz was only uploaded 3 days ago. See bug #175874. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750283 Title: Enforce switcher 'bring to front' to avoid seeing the launcher while doing ALT-Tab ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 438868] Re: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend
Thanks Chris and Vish for testing this. I've also run the proposed backport of: http://cgit.compiz.org/compiz/core/commit/?id=30a92d8a060d79181a28840d7c66428ef431200c Sam Spilsbury who is happy with the patch and so on that basis I'm prepared to re-sign Chris' upload attempt on that basis. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438868 Title: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 438868] Re: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: None => lucid-updates ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu Maverick) Milestone: None => maverick-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438868 Title: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 737707] Re: unity-window-decorator: Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when <69 pixels wide
Reproduce more simply with: 1. Ctrl-Alt-t (open in new Terminal) 2. Resize it as small as you can (the resize padding borders have gone and all that remains is the 1px border... which will disappear with a new upload of bug #733233 anyway). This will likely be down to the code that is acting on the configuration in the theme, rather than the theme itself, which I presume is 'unity- window-decorator'; apologies in advance if that is presumptuous. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737707 Title: unity-window-decorator: Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when <69 pixels wide ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 737707] Re: Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when <69 pixels wide
** Summary changed: - Focused window loses resizable sides and large shadow when <69 pixels wide + Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when <69 pixels wide ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unity Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when <69 pixels wide + unity-window-decorator: Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when <69 pixels wide -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737707 Title: unity-window-decorator: Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when <69 pixels wide ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 716462] Re: Unity is not restored on unity/compiz crash: compiz doesn't register properly with gnome-session
** Tags added: watchdog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716462 Title: Unity is not restored on unity/compiz crash: compiz doesn't register properly with gnome-session ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 723853] Re: Window un-maximize - When a window is un-maximised for the first time the title bar is obscured by the menu bar.
** Description changed: Description: When Firefox is un-maximised for the first time after a fresh install on a Dell Inspiron mini with a screen resolution of 1024 x 600, the firefox window title bar is completely obscured by the menubar. The user is unable to drag window out of this position as none of the title bar is shown. - Desired behaviour: + Desired behaviour: Un-maximising a window should never place the window title bar underneath the menu bar. + + A work-around is to use the Alt-key in the centre of the window to drag + it down slightly. ** Description changed: Description: When Firefox is un-maximised for the first time after a fresh install on a Dell Inspiron mini with a screen resolution of 1024 x 600, the firefox window title bar is completely obscured by the menubar. The user is unable to drag window out of this position as none of the title bar is shown. Desired behaviour: Un-maximising a window should never place the window title bar underneath the menu bar. - A work-around is to use the Alt-key in the centre of the window to drag - it down slightly. + A work-around is to use the Alt-key in the centre of the window to Alt- + drag it down slightly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723853 Title: Window un-maximize - When a window is un-maximised for the first time the title bar is obscured by the menu bar. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 723878] Re: When windows open for the first time they should not hide the launcher
Description copied from dup, I think the window placement code is right, but the addition of the shade frame (then being see by the Launcher as part of the window) is what is initiating the hide: Starting with a clean desktop and launching a single application (eg. Ctrl-Alt-t for a Terminal) this causes the Launcher to always immediately hide. It appears that the window itself is being aligned to not overlap with the Launcher, but that the shadow around it on the left-hand-side overlaps with the Launcher. Ideally the Launcher should not take outside/shadow space into consideration when determining if to hide. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723878 Title: When windows open for the first time they should not hide the launcher ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 726063] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in draw_decor_list()
(gdb) frame #0 0x0805c145 in draw_decor_list (data=0x0) at /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/decorator.c:686 686 in /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/decorator.c Null pointer. Great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726063 Title: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in draw_decor_list() ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 726063] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in draw_decor_list()
Got this this time: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. window_closed (screen=0x9286810, win=0x93532a0) at /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/wnck.c:722 722 /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/wnck.c: No such file or directory. in /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/wnck.c but stupidly typed 'cont' instead of 'bt'. Assuming it's the same crash, and not another one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726063 Title: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in draw_decor_list() ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 724874] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT()
Over the weekend this has been happening fairly reliably within the first ~10 minutes of usage; (just attach gdb after you login and leave it running): Thread 1 (Thread 0xb76eb880 (LWP 2697)): #0 0x0805bbfe in ?? () #1 0x008c5088 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #2 0x008a8352 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #3 0x008bb048 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #4 0x008c3b29 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x008c3cc2 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #6 0x00c075ca in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwnck-1.so.22 #7 0x00c07c78 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwnck-1.so.22 #8 0x003ff451 in ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #9 0x00403c08 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #10 0x004043d0 in ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #11 0x00404a93 in g_main_loop_run () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #12 0x00d5ca49 in IA__gtk_main () at /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.24.1/gtk/gtkmain.c:1255 #13 0x0804f580 in main () Running strings on the resulting gcore (yes, a bit basic, but I walked up and down the stack with "print *(char **)($esp-N)" manually), it might be: window-decorator:2697): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed since I found some of these component strings in the history of the stack (or it could be completely the wrong thing). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724874 Title: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT() ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
** Description changed: Binary package hint: compiz-fusion-plugins-main - In compiz-fusion, the Shift Switcher has a strange way of keeping track - of windows. Let's say I have ten windows open, numbered in order of - which I've used most recently (1 being most recent). + In compiz-fusion, the various Switchers have a strange way of keeping + track of windows. Let's say I have ten windows open, numbered in order + of which I've used most recently (1 being most recent). Application switcher allows me to switch between the 2 most recently used windows (1 to 2 and back to 1) by simply pressing alt-tab and alt- tab again. After switching, it leaves all windows where they were except the one I've selected. To go to the one I used before these two, I press alt-tab-tab (1-2-3). Shift switcher does something arbitrary that I haven't figured out yet. In most cases if I just do hyper-tab, it goes 1-2. But if I cycle through more than that, it goes 1-2-8 or 1-2-4. Then what was 1 may get pushed way to the back behind 10 and 7. Most annoying of all, it doesn't just bring the window to the front temporarily as application switcher does, but it permanently shuffles the windows on your desktop, so everything is out of order, especially if I cycle through more than one window. This makes it impossible to quickly switch between two or three windows I'm working actively with, instead bringing to the front things I haven't worked with in hours. Why not just use the same algorithm application switcher uses, keeping track of which windows have been used most recently and leaving all windows except the selected one where they were? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175874 Title: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 175874] Re: shift switcher should keep track of order like application switcher
I'm bumping this up to High again; it breaks 25 years of predictable (LIFO) stack operation using Alt-tab across all major competitor operating systems, and all previous Ubuntu releases. (If it gets set to Medium/Low again, I will accept that judgment and not change it further). ** Summary changed: - shift switcher should keep track of order like application switcher + Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175874 Title: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 175874] Re: shift switcher should keep track of order like application switcher
I was reading the various parts of the switcher code on the train today, and doing some testing with: for i in $(seq 12) ; do pango-view --font 'Ubuntu 200' --text $i & done it appears that the very act of Alt-Tabbing is changing the stack ordering, by causing each window to be momentarily raised. A simple test that reflect this is to Alt-Tab-Tab-Tab-Tab-Tab and then Shift-Tab an equal number of times back to the original window. This should cause no change to the stack ordering, but what is actually happening is that all of the windows that have been "touched" will now be moved to the top of the Alt-Tab list, in the reverse order. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Low => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175874 Title: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 175874] Re: shift switcher should keep track of order like application switcher
Mmmm, 3 years. I guess we really should try to fix this if we're going to push compiz out to everyone by default for Ubuntu 11.04. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => High ** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu Natty) Milestone: None => ubuntu-11.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175874 Title: shift switcher should keep track of order like application switcher ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 682973] Re: Incorrect Alt-Tab behaviour ordering: not predictable LIFO stack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 175874 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175874 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 175874 shift switcher should keep track of order like application switcher * You can subscribe to bug 175874 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/175874/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682973 Title: Incorrect Alt-Tab behaviour ordering: not predictable LIFO stack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 682973] Re: Incorrect Alt-Tab behaviour ordering: not predictable LIFO stack
Haven't pin it down completely; my observation is that an Alt-Tab causes a stack /exchange/; if the working set are entries 1 and 2 in the stack Alt-Tab therefore does as expected. If in the mean-time you've opened another 10 terminals or windows and your desired working set are entries 1 and 10 in the stack, then these become 10 and 1... requiring repeated keypresses to get back to. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Triaged ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682973 Title: Incorrect Alt-Tab behaviour ordering: not predictable LIFO stack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 708670] Re: Compiz gnome resize not-consistent/present in all directions
Per Sam. ** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708670 Title: Compiz gnome resize not-consistent/present in all directions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 684745] Re: Alt-tab causes compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed.
Martin: maybe it's too much RAM, try taking some out ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684745 Title: Alt-tab causes compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 684745] Re: Alt-tab causes compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed.
** Summary changed: - compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed. + Alt-tab causes compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684745 Title: Alt-tab causes compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 387828] Re: ALT+TAB with compiz shows really ugly icons for minimized windows
At the very least, the preview should show the ratio of the minimised window as a box (Otto, comment #22). But really a representation of the window needs cacheing before it is destroyed. Bear in mind that if the user alt-tabs past that minimised window even for a second then it *is* going to be raised anyway and redrawn at that point, then scaled, then... (all of which has considerably higher-latency). On the icon-scaling front, I don't think the huge icons help much. The huge icons are too big to be useful, and the small corner icons are too _small_ to be quickly visibly useful; but either way they also should be drawn from the show and not a rescaling of a fixed bitmap rendering (Minimising Firefox still shows this). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387828 Title: ALT+TAB with compiz shows really ugly icons for minimized windows ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 684745] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed.
Martin: I was getting about four crashes per day on Alt-Tab until I upgraded the RAM from 1GB to 3GB, I suspect it's partly starvation/paging related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684745 Title: compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 685135] Re: ALT+TAB makes unity crash (compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed.)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 684745 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684745 The bug I've duped this against should have a more complete stracktrace. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 684745 compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed. * You can subscribe to bug 684745 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/684745/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685135 Title: ALT+TAB makes unity crash (compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b >= 0' failed.) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 691653] Re: compiz crashes when using alt-tab (the radeon driver kills it)
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #660143 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660143 ** Also affects: compiz (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660143 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691653 Title: compiz crashes when using alt-tab (the radeon driver kills it) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 150690] Re: Can't drag a window to another workspace
Stanislaw, Corona: patches welcomed! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150690 Title: Can't drag a window to another workspace ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 657032] Re: Resize area of title bar is too small when using Compiz
Keith: if you're interested, the general "resizing is hard" issue is bug #160311; hopefully it's going to finally get nailed for this cycle. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657032 Title: Resize area of title bar is too small when using Compiz ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 694945] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in CompWindow::id()
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: compiz + Compiz occasionally crashes, leaving open windows where they are. Mouse + input works, Keyboard does not work (except for Caps-lock and Ctrl- + Alt-F*). Compiz crashed in ordinary Unity session. Keyboard was then unresponsive while mouse was ok. - ProblemType: CrashDistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 + Relevant metadata: + Package: compiz-core 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop3-0ubuntu5 - ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-11.25-generic 2.6.37-rc7 - Uname: Linux 2.6.37-11-generic i686 - Architecture: i386 - CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/allscreens/options/active_plugins' - Date: Tue Dec 28 22:29:54 2010 - ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compizInstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha i386 (20101202) - MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer INC. 1001HA - PciDisplay: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27ae] (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) - ProcCmdline: compiz - ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE=en_NZ.UTF-8:en - LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8 - LC_MESSAGES=en_AG.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash - ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37-11-generic root=UUID=e5390fc8-c785-43b9-87d8-3f42e4bc2d92 ro vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.5+6ubuntu6 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.9+repack-1ubuntu3 libdrm2 2.4.22-2ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.901-2ubuntu2 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.2-1ubuntu2 SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x807fa77 <_ZN10CompWindow2idEv+7>:mov 0x2c(%eax),%eax PC (0x0807fa77) ok source "0x2c(%eax)" (0x61626998) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination "%eax" ok SegvReason: reading unknown VMA Signal: 11SourcePackage: compiz StacktraceTop: CompWindow::id() () UnityScreen::getWindowPaintList() () from /usr/lib/compiz/libunityshell.so CompositeScreen::getWindowPaintList() () from /usr/lib/compiz/libcomposite.so PrivateGLScreen::paintOutputRegion(GLMatrix const&, CompRegion const&, CompOutput*, unsigned int) () from /usr/lib/compiz/libopengl.so GLScreen::glPaintOutput(GLScreenPaintAttrib const&, GLMatrix const&, CompRegion const&, CompOutput*, unsigned int) () from /usr/lib/compiz/libopengl.so Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in CompWindow::id() - UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare - XorgConf: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' - XsessionErrors: (nautilus:10285): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_value_free: assertion `value != NULL' failed - dmi.bios.date: 02/26/2010 - dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. - dmi.bios.version: 1401 - dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. - dmi.board.name: 1005HA - dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. - dmi.board.version: x.xx - dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0x - dmi.chassis.type: 10 - dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. - dmi.chassis.version: x.x - dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1401:bd02/26/2010:svnASUSTeKComputerINC.:pn1001HA:pvrx.x:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rn1005HA:rvrx.xx:cvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:ct10:cvrx.x: - dmi.product.name: 1001HA - dmi.product.version: x.x - dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. - system: distro = Ubuntu, architecture = i686, kernel = 2.6.37-11-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694945 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in CompWindow::id() ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 694945] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in CompWindow::id()
After hitting this, dropping to a terminal (Ctrl-Alt-F1) allows login, followed by typing 'unity' to restart compiz. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694945 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in CompWindow::id() ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 81583] Re: compiz.real crashes when switching to 'cube' workspace effect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 83786 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83786 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 86750 [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 83786 [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV" * You can subscribe to bug 83786 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/83786/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81583 Title: compiz.real crashes when switching to 'cube' workspace effect ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 86341] Re: [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 83786 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83786 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 83786 [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV" * You can subscribe to bug 83786 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/83786/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86341 Title: [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 86750] Re: [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 83786 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83786 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 83786 [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV" * You can subscribe to bug 83786 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/83786/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86750 Title: [apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 684716] Re: all applets randomly closing unexplectedly on start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 683100 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683100 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 683100 gnome-panel applets crashing with compiz 0.9 * You can subscribe to bug 683100 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/683100/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684716 Title: all applets randomly closing unexplectedly on start ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 683100] Re: gnome-panel applets crashing with compiz 0.9
According to a comment on the dup, this has already been fixed in trunk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683100 Title: gnome-panel applets crashing with compiz 0.9 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 683635] Re: remove fade from the compiz plugin list
Travis: the stuff that's trying to be toned down/eliminated here is all the stuff that creates a perception of lag or delay in the Alt-tab process and which prevents interactions feeling clickity-click snappy. Based on the last two comments here (#13 and #14), I've tried two things: a. CCSM->"Fade"; switching to "Constant Time" (vs. Constant Speed) and seeing Speed to minimum (0.1, no known/documented units). This makes the experience a bit more pleasant but seems to have a bug (I was no longer able to alt-tab back to the CCSM window, like a game of whack-a-mole, other unfocused windows kept being raised instead) b. CCSM->"Switcher"; setting opacity to 100%; this means windows are no longer "disappeared". All are shown on the screen during the alt-tab process and just the stack order is changed... this is probably closer to what people are used to, and since everything is already completely opaque (except terminals) there is no appreciable fading. Both help, but both feel like workarounds. Didier: I've just noticed the setting just below those "Build Mipmaps for smooth scaling"... I bet this is the root-cause; doing that successful scaling (times N windows onscreen) would account for the massive blip in RAM usage that causes the deadlock/disk I/O death in extreme cases, and in normal cases is just causing the multi-second lag). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683635 Title: remove fade from the compiz plugin list ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 685325] Re: Gnome menus & window titles missing
With what Omer suggests, you should then be able to go System->Administration->Login and change the default session. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685325 Title: Gnome menus & window titles missing ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 683635] Re: remove fade from the compiz plugin list
Sam, is there a better (eg. numerical) setting that can be adjusted to disable the fade, or to reduce it to under 0.0-0.1 seconds? I suspect the wish here is not to remove core fade functionality completely, but to just disable it by default in the case of staticswitcher. Because this is marked as Fix Committed I have tried to find the tree which received the commit in order to get a better overview of what was done, but I can't find which one it would have been. Hopefully didrocks can shed light on what got changed/patch for the moment and whether this is the best long-term solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683635 Title: remove fade from the compiz plugin list ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 683635] Re: remove fade from the compiz plugin list
The disparity in latency with respect to key press-and-release speed is bug #684871. In comment #7 above I had managed to link back to /this/ bug report... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683635 Title: remove fade from the compiz plugin list ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 684870] [NEW] Latency disparity between slow/fast Alt-tab tab tab hit speed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Also discovered in breaking down bug #683635, to reproduce: 1. Hit hit Alt-tab tab tab tab tab really really fast 2. and then do it it again slightly slower The first responds near instantly, and the second can lag for several seconds. It appears that there is a delay before the switch shows: For (1) when the entire action can be completed and the Alt key released within this delay period then the window change is instantaneous. In the case of (2) the switcher appears and then the latency (possibly a result of bug #684843) is introduced. It is perfectly /possibly/ for it to switch quasi-instantly, as can be demonstrated in the case of (1) using successive fast hits. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684870 Title: Latency disparity between slow/fast Alt-tab tab tab hit speed ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 684871] [NEW] Latency disparity between slow/fast Alt-tab tab tab hit speed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Also discovered in breaking down bug #683635, to reproduce: 1. Hit hit Alt-tab tab tab tab tab really really fast 2. and then do it it again slightly slower The first responds near instantly, and the second can lag for several seconds. It appears that there is a delay before the switch shows: For (1) when the entire action can be completed and the Alt key released within this delay period then the window change is instantaneous. In the case of (2) the switcher appears and then the latency (possibly a result of bug #684843) is introduced. It is perfectly /possibly/ for it to switch quasi-instantly, as can be demonstrated in the case of (1) using successive fast hits. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684871 Title: Latency disparity between slow/fast Alt-tab tab tab hit speed ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 684843] Re: staticswitcher/ Alt-Tab can be slow to appear
Confirming, this was picked up as a side issue in the process of investigating bug #683635. In the extreme case of this, the "paging in" of the images can cause swapping issues. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684843 Title: staticswitcher/ Alt-Tab can be slow to appear ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 683121] Re: Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session: compains that "Window Manager" does not respond
** Summary changed:
- Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session
+ Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session: compains that
"Window Manager" does not respond
** Summary changed:
- Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session: compains that
"Window Manager" does not respond
+ Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session: complains that
"Window Manager" does not respond
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: compiz
-
Compiz hangs on logout. I will be asked if I want to kill the
application (see screenshot).
- ProblemType: Bug
- DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
- Package: compiz 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop2-0ubuntu3
- ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-7.18-generic 2.6.37-rc3
- Uname: Linux 2.6.37-7-generic x86_64
- Architecture: amd64
- CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz/general/allscreens/options/active_plugins'
- Date: Tue Nov 30 14:47:36 2010
- InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
- PackageArchitecture: all
- PciDisplay: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc
RV730XT [Radeon HD 4670] [1002:9490] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
- ProcEnviron:
- LANG=de_DE.utf8
- SHELL=/bin/bash
- ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37-7-generic
root=UUID=b1ea06c8-f3d6-4d70-b570-bc9d24ac107f ro quiet splash
- RelatedPackageVersions:
- xserver-xorg 1:7.5+6ubuntu3b1
- libgl1-mesa-glx 7.9+repack-1ubuntu2
- libdrm2 2.4.22-2ubuntu1
- xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-1ubuntu1
- xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.2-1ubuntu2
- SourcePackage: compiz
- XorgConf: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
- dmi.bios.date: 07/15/2009
- dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
- dmi.bios.version: DPP3510J.86A.0572.2009.0715.2346
- dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
- dmi.board.name: DG33TL
- dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
- dmi.board.version: AAD89517-802
- dmi.chassis.type: 3
- dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrDPP3510J.86A.0572.2009.0715.2346:bd07/15/2009:svn:pn:pvr:rvnIntelCorporation:rnDG33TL:rvrAAD89517-802:cvn:ct3:cvr:
- glxinfo: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
- system: distro = Ubuntu, architecture = x86_64, kernel = 2.6.37-7-generic
+ viz: Clicking on the the (') menu in the top-right and selecting
+ "Restart..."/"Restart to complete upgrade..." asks for confirmation, and
+ then brings up a box complaining that the "Window Manager" is not
+ responding and whether the user wishes to reboot anyway.
+
+ Since a normal user doesn't know what a Window Manager is, ideally the
+ window manager should ensure that it can always respond and therefore
+ allow the shutdown to proceed.
--
Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session: complains that
"Window Manager" does not respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683121
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz
Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 682973] Re: Incorrect Alt-Tab behaviour ordering: not predictable LIFO stack
Reproducible: 1. Fresh login 2. Open Terminal #1 3. Open Firefox #1 4. Open Terminal #2 5. Open Firefox #2 6. Open Terminal #3 7. Open Firefox #3 8. Open Terminal #4 9. Press+hold Alt-Tab for the first time Expected results: stack is alternate Terminal/Firefox. Actual result: three terminals are next to each other. Further demonstration can be found by attempting to bring all of the Terminal, or all of the Firefox windows to the front/top of the stack. 10. Even further, now load Empathy Attempt to get get all of the terminals, or all of the Firefox windows to the front/top of the stack. This is also impossible as the Empathy window will stay at slot 3, or 4 regardlessly. -- Incorrect Alt-Tab behaviour ordering: not predictable LIFO stack https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 675307] Re: compiz can't load plugins and won't run in VirtualBox
Yougo: Unity (via Compiz) is rendering the interface in the same way that a 3D video game work: people measure games in the number of Frames Per Second (FPS) displayed. For each new frame the interface gets wiped and is redrawn from scratch, when this is done enough times per second it appears smooth. With OpenGL hardware GPU rendering it's possible to manage 60+ FPS per second. This is more complete FPS than the eyes can see, so the game, or Unity interface looks super-smooth. With OpenGL software rendering it is only possible to get 1-2 FPS which makes the interface jerky, unresponsive and uses up lots of battery and CPU. Without efficient and fast hardware OpenGL support it is better to swtich back to traditional 2D rendering (the GNOME Panel) which uses a different mechanism for drawing to the screen, where only what has moved is updated, not the whole screen. Doing software 2D rendering means that many of the effects that people have become used to are not possible. -- compiz can't load plugins and won't run in VirtualBox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Compiz] [Bug 675307] Re: compiz can't load plugins and won't run
Slight variation on the "plugins not loading", although I can't see anything OpenGL/3D driver related per se: $ compiz --replace ... compiz (core) - Error: Couldn't load plugin 'decoration' compiz (core) - Error: Couldn't load plugin 'png' compiz (core) - Error: Couldn't load plugin 'svg' compiz (core) - Error: Plugin 'composite' not loaded. compiz (core) - Error: InitPlugin 'neg' failed compiz (core) - Error: Couldn't activate plugin 'neg' ... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00c269f5 in GLTexture::bindPixmapToTexture(unsigned long, int, int, int) () from /usr/lib/compiz/libopengl.so Is it an ABI change in the plugin interface? -- compiz can't load plugins and won't run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~compiz Post to : compiz@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~compiz More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
