i don't say latency is not an issue, but mvc applications make it really easy
to add caching at a later point without hazzle and that makes up lots of speed
if needed.
also i made the observation, that although mvc frameworks hit php performance
pretty hard, its not always observable for the end-user, since php time makes
up only a short amount compared to either Database or UI (Javascript) stuff.
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 09:50:11 Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:59:10 +0100, Gaetano Giunta g...@ez.no wrote:
An interesting blog post (an update in fact) about relative speed of
different frameworks in building a simple mvc app:
http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=421
eZComponents are not included, mainly I think because when the original
test was carried out in 2006 the mvc component did not exist.
It would be nice if somebody could find a couple of hours to create the
equivalent ezc-based app and test it.
Even if we do not come out first in terms of speed, just showing up
that blog page would be useful, I think.
@gaetano: I can tell you ezcMvc is frikking fast in the hello world
business. I haven't made a statistically sound benchmark but i did some
siege testing ZF vs ezcMvc base apps (using the PHP View Handler) and ezc
was faster by a multitude.
Would you be interested in spending some time on this? It'd be good to
know what the ballpark difference is. Not only speed wise, but also
feature wise.
Also, performance is really a non-issue if you decide to use a
framework/mvc implementation in my opinion.
That I disagree with. Latency is something that's really annoying for
users.
regards,
--
Derick Rethans
eZ components Product Manager
eZ systems | http://ez.no
--
Benjamin Eberlei
http://www.beberlei.de
--
Components mailing list
Components@lists.ez.no
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
