Re: [Computer-go] Computer-go Digest, Vol 62, Issue 8

2015-03-09 Thread Urban Hafner
  on
  stderr.
 
  Now my question is if there's a way to do that for games that are being
  played on CGOS or KGS. I'm wondering if this is possible with just
 GoGui
  and the tools it provides. After all you can pass gogui-twogtp as the
  program to GoGui and observe a game played by two bots. Is there
 maybe
  a
  possible combination of GoGui commands to have GoGui somehow in the
  middle between the CGOS/KGS client and the bot? That way I imagine the
  commands on stderr could be displayed in GoGui while the other stuff
  passes
  right through to the client.
 
  Urban
  --
  Blog: http://bettong.net/
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
  Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
 
 
  ___
  Computer-go mailing list
  Computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
 
 
  ___
  Computer-go mailing list
  Computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
 
 
 
 
  --
  Blog: http://bettong.net/
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
  Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  
 http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20150309/36ed7322/attachment-0001.html
 
 
  --
 
  Message: 4
  Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:08:04 +0100
  From: Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
  To: computer-go@computer-go.org
  Subject: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS
  Message-ID:
CAHmXpNk=qMi_cF0EvfXgVz67+NtqGX_wJ4w8o=
 8qwzkx+xs...@mail.gmail.com
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 
  Hey everyone,
 
  I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly
 to
  get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;)
 So
  bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
  Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
  are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots
 in
  that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.
 
  Urban
  --
  Blog: http://bettong.net/
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
  Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  
 http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20150309/40484f63/attachment-0001.html
 
 
  --
 
  Message: 5
  Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:35:43 +0100
  From: Erik van der Werf erikvanderw...@gmail.com
  To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
  Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS
  Message-ID:

 cakkggrn5p-nzeitevznbaji-tpxb+biyfcxv2rgrhxri-u6...@mail.gmail.com
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
 
  Perhaps AmiGo
 
  http://amigogtp.sourceforge.net/
 
  On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
  wrote:
  Hey everyone,
 
  I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly
  to
  get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;)
 So
  bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
  Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots
 that
  are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots
 in
  that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.
 
  Urban
  --
  Blog: http://bettong.net/
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
  Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
 
  ___
  Computer-go mailing list
  Computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
 
 
  --
 
  Message: 6
  Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:55:23 +0100
  From: Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
  To: computer-go@computer-go.org
  Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS
  Message-ID:
CAHmXpNmeOw9Y6ZXB=
 uwmqnaz_6jopysc_xfardubo4snb_j...@mail.gmail.com
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 
  Thanks Erik! Yes, that will work.
 
  Urban
 
  On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Erik van der Werf 
 erikvanderw...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Perhaps AmiGo
 
  http://amigogtp.sourceforge.net/
 
  On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
  wrote:
   Hey everyone,
  
   I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13.
 Mainly
  to
   get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad.
 ;)
  So
   bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
   Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots
   that
   are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any
 bots
  in
   that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.
  
   Urban
   --
   Blog: http://bettong.net/
   Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
   Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Urban Hafner
Thanks Petr,

I'm now running AmiGoGtp on CGOS, too. I think that's enough bots on my
machine for now. Hopefully, the bot will be strong enough soon enough to
make that work.

Urban

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Petr Baudis pa...@ucw.cz wrote:

   Hi!

 On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:08:04AM +0100, Urban Hafner wrote:
  I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly
 to
  get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;)
 So
  bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
  Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
  are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots
 in
  that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

   What about libego?  That used to be a pretty basic MCTS.

   Or you could try running a super-weak Pachi:

  Pachi can be used as a test opponent for development of other go-playing
  programs. For example, to get the plainest UCT player, use:
 
  ./pachi -t =5000
 policy=ucb1,playout=light,prior=eqex=0,dynkomi=none,pondering=0,pass_all_alive
 (see Experiments and Testing section in README for more details)

   This is plain UCT with light playouts and no move priors. If you just
 implemented the basic algorithms, your program should be equal or better
 than this.

   (Of course you can then gradually enable some pieces, or even just
 some of the priors/playout heuristics.  I'd recommend implementing, in
 the order of priority, captures and 3x3 patterns in playouts, priors for
 the same in the tree, and RAVE.  Don't bother tuning things too much
 before having RAVE as that is a big game-changer; but it probably won't
 work well without at least the playout heuristics I mentioned.)

 --
 Petr Baudis
 If you do not work on an important problem, it's unlikely
 you'll do important work.  -- R. Hamming
 http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html
 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go




-- 
Blog: http://bettong.net/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Christoph Birk

On Mar 9, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com wrote:
 I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly to 
 get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So 
 bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against Brown. 
 So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that are in 
 strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in that 
 range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

myCtest-xxk is a pure random player.
myCtest-xxk-UCT adds a tree, nothing else.

Christoph

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Christoph Birk

On Mar 9, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Christoph Birk b...@obs.carnegiescience.edu wrote:
 On Mar 9, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com wrote:
 I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly to 
 get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So 
 bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against 
 Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that 
 are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in 
 that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.
 
 myCtest-xxk is a pure random player.

I meant to write pure MC player.

 myCtest-xxk-UCT adds a tree, nothing else.

Christoph

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Hiroshi Yamashita

Hi,


I would like to ask the owner of 'resign13' to stop it, please.


I'm running 'resign13'.
I think it's elo is -407, not zero.
http://cgos.boardspace.net/13x13/cross/resign13.html
Standing list shows zero. but I think it is maybe not correct.
http://cgos.boardspace.net/13x13/standings.html

I stopped it.
The reason I run is to save cpu power.
I'm running anchor Gnugo-3.7.10-a1.
If someone could run anchor, please mail me. 
If there is few bots on CGOS 13x13 again, I'll put it again.


Regards,
Hiroshi Yamashita

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread folkert
 I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly to
 get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So
 bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
 Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
 are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in
 that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

`Stop' is definately between brown and maybe a tiny bit better than
that.
http://www.vanheusden.com/stop/

I'll see if I can connecct it to the 13x13 server.



Folkert van Heusden

-- 
You've probably gotten really fed up with never winning in the Mega-
Millions lottery. Well, weep no longer: www.smartwinning.info tells
you everything that might help you deciding what numbers to choose.
With nice graphs and pretty animations!
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Christoph Birk

I would like to ask the owner of 'resign13' to stop it, please.
Since the rating algorithm appears to be capped at '0' Elo,
'resign13' is skewing the ratings at the lower end.

Thanks,
Christoph

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] [ANN] Imago - Go board optical recognition

2015-03-09 Thread Andrea Carta
... and again...

 - Pisa's organizers agreed on letting us take pictures (or movies, we'll
 decide later) of some games. One of the players will also contribute (he
 wants to take the pictures himself); others will probably join later on.

Pisa was a success. At least, it was on the software side; not so much on
the hardware's. The first game, my colleague took pictures with his camera,
and everything went allright - the reconstruction was completed in a matter
of few minutes. The second game, I also took pictures with my camera, but
one of the players kept bumping the table and even my tripod, creating so
many errors it required about twenty minutes to complete the reconstruction
- we'll discard this game. The third game, we recorded a video with an Ipad
mounted on a tripod: everything went right and we'll proceed with the
reconstruction as soon as we'll have enough frames extracted. The fourth
game, we tried a new program, PhotoClock, capable of taking a picture each
time one of the players pressed the keyboard (it worked as a clock): that
proved uneffective, as the players' arms were present in each picture (the
contrary of what we hoped), and we'll have to try again with a pair of
mouses instead.
In the whole, we're very satisfied. The paper will be ready at the end of
the week, but without a LaTeX template or at least the number of chars per
page we won't be able to redact it. We hope the problem will be solved soon!

mr. Andrea Carta

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Observing a game in GoGui that's running on KGS/CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Urban Hafner
Yes, that it!

Thank you, Rémi.

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Rémi Coulom remi.cou...@free.fr wrote:

 gogui-display:
 http://gogui.sourceforge.net/doc/reference-display.html


 On 03/08/2015 10:04 AM, Urban Hafner wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 I'd like to display some statistics from my bot as an overlay for the
 current board. Using live graphics on GoGui is probably the easiest way to
 do it. I just need to run the bot in GoGui and emit the proper commands on
 stderr.

 Now my question is if there's a way to do that for games that are being
 played on CGOS or KGS. I'm wondering if this is possible with just GoGui
 and the tools it provides. After all you can pass gogui-twogtp as the
 program to GoGui and observe a game played by two bots. Is there maybe a
 possible combination of GoGui commands to have GoGui somehow in the
 middle between the CGOS/KGS client and the bot? That way I imagine the
 commands on stderr could be displayed in GoGui while the other stuff passes
 right through to the client.

 Urban
 --
 Blog: http://bettong.net/
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
 Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/


 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go


 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go




-- 
Blog: http://bettong.net/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

[Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Urban Hafner
Hey everyone,

I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly to
get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So
bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in
that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

Urban
-- 
Blog: http://bettong.net/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Urban Hafner
Thanks Erik! Yes, that will work.

Urban

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Erik van der Werf erikvanderw...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Perhaps AmiGo

 http://amigogtp.sourceforge.net/

 On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
 wrote:
  Hey everyone,
 
  I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly
 to
  get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;)
 So
  bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
  Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
  are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots
 in
  that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.
 
  Urban
  --
  Blog: http://bettong.net/
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
  Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
 
  ___
  Computer-go mailing list
  Computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go




-- 
Blog: http://bettong.net/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Petr Baudis
  Hi!

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:08:04AM +0100, Urban Hafner wrote:
 I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly to
 get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So
 bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
 Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
 are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in
 that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

  What about libego?  That used to be a pretty basic MCTS.

  Or you could try running a super-weak Pachi:

 Pachi can be used as a test opponent for development of other go-playing
 programs. For example, to get the plainest UCT player, use:
 
 ./pachi -t =5000 
 policy=ucb1,playout=light,prior=eqex=0,dynkomi=none,pondering=0,pass_all_alive
(see Experiments and Testing section in README for more details)

  This is plain UCT with light playouts and no move priors. If you just
implemented the basic algorithms, your program should be equal or better
than this.

  (Of course you can then gradually enable some pieces, or even just
some of the priors/playout heuristics.  I'd recommend implementing, in
the order of priority, captures and 3x3 patterns in playouts, priors for
the same in the tree, and RAVE.  Don't bother tuning things too much
before having RAVE as that is a big game-changer; but it probably won't
work well without at least the playout heuristics I mentioned.)

-- 
Petr Baudis
If you do not work on an important problem, it's unlikely
you'll do important work.  -- R. Hamming
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Computer-go Digest, Vol 62, Issue 8

2015-03-09 Thread Pawel Koziol
 and observe a game played by two bots. Is there maybe
 a
 possible combination of GoGui commands to have GoGui somehow in the
 middle between the CGOS/KGS client and the bot? That way I imagine the
 commands on stderr could be displayed in GoGui while the other stuff
 passes
 right through to the client.

 Urban
 --
 Blog: http://bettong.net/
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
 Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/


 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go


 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go




 --
 Blog: http://bettong.net/
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
 Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20150309/36ed7322/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 4
 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:08:04 +0100
 From: Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
 To: computer-go@computer-go.org
 Subject: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS
 Message-ID:
   CAHmXpNk=qMi_cF0EvfXgVz67+NtqGX_wJ4w8o=8qwzkx+xs...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Hey everyone,

 I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly to
 get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So
 bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
 Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
 are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in
 that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

 Urban
 --
 Blog: http://bettong.net/
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
 Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20150309/40484f63/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 5
 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:35:43 +0100
 From: Erik van der Werf erikvanderw...@gmail.com
 To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
 Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS
 Message-ID:
   cakkggrn5p-nzeitevznbaji-tpxb+biyfcxv2rgrhxri-u6...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

 Perhaps AmiGo

 http://amigogtp.sourceforge.net/

 On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
 wrote:
 Hey everyone,

 I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly
 to
 get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So
 bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
 Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
 are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in
 that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

 Urban
 --
 Blog: http://bettong.net/
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
 Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/

 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go


 --

 Message: 6
 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:55:23 +0100
 From: Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
 To: computer-go@computer-go.org
 Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS
 Message-ID:
   CAHmXpNmeOw9Y6ZXB=uwmqnaz_6jopysc_xfardubo4snb_j...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Thanks Erik! Yes, that will work.

 Urban

 On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Erik van der Werf erikvanderw...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Perhaps AmiGo

 http://amigogtp.sourceforge.net/

 On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com
 wrote:
  Hey everyone,
 
  I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly
 to
  get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;)
 So
  bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
  Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots
  that
  are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots
 in
  that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.
 
  Urban
  --
  Blog: http://bettong.net/
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
  Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
 
  ___
  Computer-go mailing list
  Computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go




 --
 Blog: http://bettong.net/
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
 Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
 -- next part

Re: [Computer-go] Weak bots to run on CGOS

2015-03-09 Thread Erik van der Werf
Perhaps AmiGo

http://amigogtp.sourceforge.net/

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Urban Hafner cont...@urbanhafner.com wrote:
 Hey everyone,

 I'm currently running Brown (random bot) and GnuGo on CGOS 13x13. Mainly to
 get a feel for the strength of my own bot. And my bot is really bad. ;) So
 bad that it looses all games against GnuGo, but wins all games against
 Brown. So, the rating is a bit useless I assume as there are no bots that
 are in strength between GnuGo and the random player. Are there any bots in
 that range out there? I'd be willing to run them myself on CGOS.

 Urban
 --
 Blog: http://bettong.net/
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
 Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/

 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go