Re: [computer-go] Amsterdam paper
On 5/19/07, Thomas Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is another Amsterdam paper on Go, although about life death and not full game playing. I may be missing the obvious, but in Section 4.2, Diagram 13, isn't Black 10 a basic ko violation? regards, -John ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
Re: [computer-go] Amsterdam paper
On 5/19/07, Thomas Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is another Amsterdam paper on Go, although about life death and not full game playing. I may be missing the obvious, but in Section 4.2, Diagram 13, isn't Black 10 a basic ko violation? Yes, that eats up one of the necessary external ko-threats which White needs in order to win. The GoLaTeX style file I have does not mention the Ko-threats and answers played elsewhere underneath the diagrams. Thomas regards, -John ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
[computer-go] Amsterdam paper
Here is another Amsterdam paper on Go, although about life death and not full game playing. http://lie.math.brocku.ca/twolf/papers/bugsintro.ps Thomas ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
