Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-23 Thread Tom Piwowar
>> Google is offering new mapping software for cell phones without gps using
>> triangulation via the cell towers.  Has anyone tried this?  How was it if
>> so?

I have read that the map makers (now owned by GPS companies) are trying 
to restrict how their maps are used with cell phones. I think they know 
that a good cell phone app could kill their hardware business.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-23 Thread Ellen Rains Harris

It works great.  Within three meters a lot of the time.


- Original Message - 
From: "mike" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]



Google is offering new mapping software for cell phones without gps using
triangulation via the cell towers.  Has anyone tried this?  How was it if
so?

Mike


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph
> I recently say an car integrated GPS that had a display that looked to be
> about 8 x 10 inches in size. This looks much more useful than the tiny
> screens I've seen on the add-on models.

While not denying the appeal of those large, built-in screens, I've
found that by putting the GPS windshield mount to the upper-left of
the steering wheel (as opposed to the right-center, where I initially
put it), the screen ends up about 6-8 inches from my eyes and ears,
thereby giving me a good view, and within easy reach for touch-screen
functions.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-21 Thread Jeff Wright
> I make it a point to ask cab drivers about their GPS systems on trips
> in Northern Virginia. I get uniformly good reports. However, on a recent
> trip when we got within about 100 yards of my destination the GPS
> ordered a sharp right turn that would have taken us far afield. The driver
did
> not seem perturbed. Strange. (Maybe these drivers are working for
> Belkin?)

I will say about the system in the Ford is that it does pinpoint locations
very accurately.  It's routing algorithm was designed by chimp in a
syphilitic delirium, but you always know where you are; just not how to get
there.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-21 Thread Tom Piwowar
>It's breathtaking how god awful this GPS system is.  I'm glad I bought the
>car used and wasn't stupid enough to spend the $2,000 the Nav option cost
>new.

I make it a point to ask cab drivers about their GPS systems on trips in 
Northern Virginia. I get uniformly good reports. However, on a recent 
trip when we got within about 100 yards of my destination the GPS ordered 
a sharp right turn that would have taken us far afield. The driver did 
not seem perturbed. Strange. (Maybe these drivers are working for Belkin?)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-21 Thread Tom Piwowar
>I have been told that most of the nav systems in cars, pale in 
>comparison with the ones you can buy off the shelf.

I recently say an car integrated GPS that had a display that looked to be 
about 8 x 10 inches in size. This looks much more useful than the tiny 
screens I've seen on the add-on models.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-20 Thread Vicky Staubly

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, mike wrote:

Google is offering new mapping software for cell phones without gps using
triangulation via the cell towers.  Has anyone tried this?  How was it if
so?


I'm using that on my work-issued Blackberry. It's ok. It's better where
the cell towers are closer together. The accurracy is anywhere from within
a mile to with a hundred yards or so (depending on closeness of cell 
towers). And, of course, if cell towers are too far (or out of range 
completely), then it won't show your position at all.


The maps seem pretty slow to download, but I have an old Blackberry, so 
maybe newer ones work better.


--
Vicky Staubly   http://www.steeds.com/vicky/vi...@steeds.com


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-20 Thread mike
Google is offering new mapping software for cell phones without gps using
triangulation via the cell towers.  Has anyone tried this?  How was it if
so?

Mike


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-20 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
I have been told that most of the nav systems in cars, pale in 
comparison with the ones you can buy off the shelf.


A lot of this depends on who they are buying their nav systems from.

I know some needs maps loaded from a DVD to make them work.

Stewart


At 04:29 PM 1/20/2009, you wrote:

This sounds still better than the Nav system that came in my wife's 2007
Ford.  I believe these are made by Pioneer.

We were going to visit family over the holidays and my cousins had moved to
a new house that we hadn't been to before.  This is just outside of
Harrisburg, PA.

I sometimes turn on GPS systems before I need them, just to see how they are
at basic navigation.  I programmed in the address, since I didn't know
exactly where they were and once we were on 83N, off of 695, I turned it on
and it immediately told me to get off at the next exit, which is nuts.  I
don't want to take MD and PA back roads for the next 100 miles.  I canceled
the navigation and tried it again a bit later and it still was bugging me to
exit, which I knew was wrong.

Finally, as we were getting near, I took one of the exits.  It was a nice
drive through a quaint, small PA town, but after about 4 miles, I crossed
the exit off 83N I really wanted.  This was the same system I tried to
program to take the Tappan-Zee bridge coming back from NE, and gave up after
about a half-hour of fighting with it (in the driveway of course).

It's breathtaking how god awful this GPS system is.  I'm glad I bought the
car used and wasn't stupid enough to spend the $2,000 the Nav option cost
new.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] GPS [was: Windows & Active X]

2009-01-20 Thread Jeff Wright
> >Right now if I punch in the street address for my church it sends me
> >1.5 miles down the road.  Reason for this is that 6 years ago they
> >redid all the street addresses for E911.  Before they were a
> >mess.  If I put in the old street address it finds it dead on.  Just
> >this past summer I saw a van from TeleAtlas in the area doing some
> >remapping.  So I expect some change in the next couple of years.

This sounds still better than the Nav system that came in my wife's 2007
Ford.  I believe these are made by Pioneer.

We were going to visit family over the holidays and my cousins had moved to
a new house that we hadn't been to before.  This is just outside of
Harrisburg, PA.

I sometimes turn on GPS systems before I need them, just to see how they are
at basic navigation.  I programmed in the address, since I didn't know
exactly where they were and once we were on 83N, off of 695, I turned it on
and it immediately told me to get off at the next exit, which is nuts.  I
don't want to take MD and PA back roads for the next 100 miles.  I canceled
the navigation and tried it again a bit later and it still was bugging me to
exit, which I knew was wrong.

Finally, as we were getting near, I took one of the exits.  It was a nice
drive through a quaint, small PA town, but after about 4 miles, I crossed
the exit off 83N I really wanted.  This was the same system I tried to
program to take the Tappan-Zee bridge coming back from NE, and gave up after
about a half-hour of fighting with it (in the driveway of course).

It's breathtaking how god awful this GPS system is.  I'm glad I bought the
car used and wasn't stupid enough to spend the $2,000 the Nav option cost
new.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*