Re: [CGUYS] Mac OS question

2007-12-13 Thread John H. Davis

Steve Rigby wrote:
  I want to upgrade the OS 10.3.9 on my eMac 1.25 gigahertz machine.  
This computer can run 10.5 Leopard, but it is marginal in terms of 
horsepower compared to newer machines that run faster.  Would Leopard 
cause this particular computer to bog down and perform sluggishly as 
opposed to how it would run under Tiger 10.4?  Bear in mind that this 
eMac is at the bottom of Apple computers that can accept Leopard.


  Leopard seems nice, but I'd rather not have a sluggish machine if 
that would be the price I'd have to pay.


  Steve 
What is it you want to do, that it won't do now under 10.39 ? (Besides 
run slower ?)


John



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Mac OS question

2007-12-13 Thread David K Watson

Actually, you are more like 1.45 x the minimum, which is
.867 Ghz.  As someone who is even closer to the minimum,
I can tell you that you won't see much if any difference in
speed doing the same things you are doing now.  It has been
documented that Leopard is slightly slower than Tiger, but
Tiger was faster than its predecessors, so you may not see
any change at all (or even an improvement) moving from
10.3.9 to 10.5.1.  Where you may see speed issues is with
some of the features you didn't have before.  The main issue
for me is with the Cover Flow file view.  It is fairly slow for me,
not tremendously useable, whereas it is really slick when I've
tried it on a machine at an Apple store.  I don't really have
speed issues with any other Leopard feature.

Aside from Cover Flow file view, unless  I am doing something
really memory- and processor-intensive, I don't see any difference
at all from when I used Tiger.  By the way, I have a 1Ghz powerbook
with 1GB RAM. and I sometimes use my son's machine,
a 1.33 Ghz iBook with .5 GB RAM, and I don't notice problems
with it either.

David

On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:00 AM, COMPUTERGUYS-L automatic digest system  
wrote:



From:Steve Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mac OS question

  I want to upgrade the OS 10.3.9 on my eMac 1.25 gigahertz machine.
This computer can run 10.5 Leopard, but it is marginal in terms of
horsepower compared to newer machines that run faster.  Would Leopard
cause this particular computer to bog down and perform sluggishly as
opposed to how it would run under Tiger 10.4?  Bear in mind that this
eMac is at the bottom of Apple computers that can accept Leopard.

  Leopard seems nice, but I'd rather not have a sluggish machine if
that would be the price I'd have to pay.

  Steve





* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



[CGUYS] Mac OS question

2007-12-12 Thread Steve Rigby
  I want to upgrade the OS 10.3.9 on my eMac 1.25 gigahertz machine.  
This computer can run 10.5 Leopard, but it is marginal in terms of 
horsepower compared to newer machines that run faster.  Would Leopard 
cause this particular computer to bog down and perform sluggishly as 
opposed to how it would run under Tiger 10.4?  Bear in mind that this 
eMac is at the bottom of Apple computers that can accept Leopard.


  Leopard seems nice, but I'd rather not have a sluggish machine if 
that would be the price I'd have to pay.


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived