Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-04 Thread Tom Piwowar
But then what does the head of Android know?  Guys sitting in their basement
writing for a blog that plays just to mac zealots obviously know more about
Google then just a guy that works there.

Once again, anything that comes from an independent, non-MS source you 
condemn as wicked zealotry. You are so steeped in MS happy talk that you 
just can't bear a careful analysis of a puzzeling occurrence.

The writer observed that it is strange that WINCE got the spotlight, even 
though Android phones are expected to arrive before well before WINCE. 
That is a good question. When people act oddly it is valid to ask why.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-04 Thread mike
So I give you a non MS source...the *actual* head of Android and then I
condemn it as...hold on my head is spinning, somebody get me off your crazy
ride.

The only puzzling occurrence is your really weird logic.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 But then what does the head of Android know?  Guys sitting in their
 basement
 writing for a blog that plays just to mac zealots obviously know more
 about
 Google then just a guy that works there.

 Once again, anything that comes from an independent, non-MS source you
 condemn as wicked zealotry. You are so steeped in MS happy talk that you
 just can't bear a careful analysis of a puzzeling occurrence.

 The writer observed that it is strange that WINCE got the spotlight, even
 though Android phones are expected to arrive before well before WINCE.
 That is a good question. When people act oddly it is valid to ask why.


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-02 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
What I took away from the windows weekly take on the new M$ mobile is that
it was just fresh lipstick on the same old pig.  The real new Windows Mobile
OS was is development hell ala Vista.

I can't tell you where I heard the rumor that M$ was leaning on the phone
companies not to produce Android devices.

-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-02 Thread Tom Piwowar
You can't, the article doesn't have anything about MS paying to or
suppressing news.

You really ought to sign up for some remedial reading classes.

Despite racking up a big list of top-tier phone set manufacturers in its 
Android Open Handset Alliance, Google¹s mobile operating system was nearly 
non-existant among OHA members¹ announcements at the GSMA Mobile World 
Congress. Is Microsoft to blame?

Is there any possibility that LG simply decided on its own to stay quiet about 
Android at MWC? No, money was involved. (Note the comma after No.)

Why are Android¹s OHA partners unable to say anything about Android at the 
place to talk about the future of mobile phones? And why are HTC and LG, which 
have the most to gain from adopting a free operating system, all touting 
Windows Mobile instead? Perhaps they¹ve been bitten with Microsoft¹s Nigerian 
Bribe Bug. Once infected, companies have to exclusively chat up Windows, just 
like all the generic PC Makers who are deeply indebted to Microsoft¹s 'We 
Recommend Windows'co-marketing money.

Etc. Etc.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-02 Thread mike
I need remedial reading?  Did you see the question mark at the end of 'Is
Microsoft to blame?'

See that question mark?   It's an open question they never prove.  The
writer has a theory that MS is somehow keeping android out, he never comes
close to proving it.  Yeah, I see the comma...money is always involved.  He
takes money being involved in LG creating handsets for MS as meaning MS paid
off LG to NOT do android?  I know in your mixed up MS is the Sith world, 1 +
2 = MS IS EVIL, but it doesn't here in real life.  This whole blog post is
full of question marks with no answers, full of sentences being started with
perhaps or maybe and why.  Heavy on theory, not so good on facts.

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-271256.html

Try that, ZDNET actually *speaks* to Rich Miner, the point man for android
at google.  I know you'd rather get your 'facts' from MFB's who didn't
attend the conference, but it might interest others to actually hear facts
from the horses mouth and not the back end of roughlydrafted.  Try posting
your stuff to coast to coast, all those fake conspiracies get better play
there.

A short quote:

*We think we are very much on track. We only released the open-source code
late last October, Miner said in an interview with CNET News. We said we'd
have the release software out in 2008, and we did. We said we'd have at
least one phone out in 2008, and we launched that in October. *

*Designing phones takes time, he added. If you understand anything about
the design cycle for OEMs [original equipment manufacturers] to build
handsets, it takes a good 12-to-18 months to go from paper to completion.
And there are many handsets in development now. The second phone has been
announced, and we expect to see more throughout the year, Miner said.*


But then what does the head of Android know?  Guys sitting in their basement
writing for a blog that plays just to mac zealots obviously know more about
Google then just a guy that works there.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 You can't, the article doesn't have anything about MS paying to or
 suppressing news.

 You really ought to sign up for some remedial reading classes.

 Despite racking up a big list of top-tier phone set manufacturers in its
 Android Open Handset Alliance, Google¹s mobile operating system was nearly
 non-existant among OHA members¹ announcements at the GSMA Mobile World
 Congress. Is Microsoft to blame?

 Is there any possibility that LG simply decided on its own to stay quiet
 about Android at MWC? No, money was involved. (Note the comma after No.)

 Why are Android¹s OHA partners unable to say anything about Android at the
 place to talk about the future of mobile phones? And why are HTC and LG,
 which have the most to gain from adopting a free operating system, all
 touting Windows Mobile instead? Perhaps they¹ve been bitten with Microsoft¹s
 Nigerian Bribe Bug. Once infected, companies have to exclusively chat up
 Windows, just like all the generic PC Makers who are deeply indebted to
 Microsoft¹s 'We Recommend Windows' co-marketing money.

 Etc. Etc.


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
Make sure you support your local CarbonONset programs!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-02 Thread Rich Schinnell

Me thinks that some here are peeing in the wind..


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-02 Thread b_s-wilk

Jailbreaking is a nondestructive software change to the Touch. It sounds
like something you'd do with sharp metal tools, but it's not. A
jailbroken iPod Touch or iPhone can easily be returned to the original
state.

iPod Touch as phone, details, 2009:
http://touchmods.wordpress.com/previous-sip-voip-releases/
http://www.ipodtouchfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120447

The MacAlly iVoice III microphone works on Gen 1 Touch only if you plug
the headphone in to the iPod jack, not the iVoice mic. Will find more
info for myself soon. My son gave me his Touch for Christmas when he got
an iPhone.

This is FUN!

Does your iTouch need to be jailbroken? I thought that was only required 
of the iPhone models. If that is the case I guess I will start paying 
more attention to Android phones.



There's a version of Skype for mobile phones that should work on the 
second generation iPod Touch. I have a 1st gen which needs an external 
microphone that I can either buy for $50 or hack myself with a few parts 
and a soldering gun, plus it needs to be jailbroken. Unlocking your 
GSM WiFi phone may not allow you to use Skype or similar because 
companies like Orange, O2, ATT and T-Mobile have disabled those 
features on their branded WiFi/GSM phones if you don't purchase a data 
package. Of course that makes using mobile VOIP and Skype almost 
pointless anyway.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-01 Thread b_s-wilk
Barron's is bullish on Verizon this month; says outlook is good. Rumor 
is iPhone on VZ, 
http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/02/23/apple-to-launch-iphone

-on-verizon-wireless/trackback/.


That might be nice, but I recently was reading a blog that called the 
iPod Touch the phone of the future. The network I want to plug into is 
not the one provided by Verizon or ATT. I consider those phone-based 
networks to be more of an impediment. The don't offer me what I want. You 
get one of them and the 1st thing they try to do is block your access to 
VOIP.


I think you're right about VOIP. The iPod Touch v.2 has a microphone, 
unlike v.1. With VOIP software [Jahjah, Fring, etc.] it should work as a 
phone, just not an iPhone--but they're not the same anyway.


Most of the high-end phones from Nokia [N-series] have WiFi, as do some 
from other companies as well. The N-97 will have a touch screen and VOIP 
when it's released in June, supposedly with open use of VOIP on any WiFi 
for the European, not US models. Orange Mobile released a mobile phone 
in 2007 that has both VOIP and GSM voice service. For VOIP-only in some 
locations the charge is around 10 Euros/mo. unlimited on their network.


There's a version of Skype for mobile phones that should work on the 
second generation iPod Touch. I have a 1st gen which needs an external 
microphone that I can either buy for $50 or hack myself with a few parts 
and a soldering gun, plus it needs to be jailbroken. Unlocking your 
GSM WiFi phone may not allow you to use Skype or similar because 
companies like Orange, O2, ATT and T-Mobile have disabled those 
features on their branded WiFi/GSM phones if you don't purchase a data 
package. Of course that makes using mobile VOIP and Skype almost 
pointless anyway.


http://www.skype.com/mobile/
http://www.nokia.com/A4136001?newsid=1291072
http://2009.nseries.com/
http://www.fring.com/
http://gigaom.com/2008/06/03/mobile-voip/

As for FIOS, I was using fiber optics in my sculptures in the late 
1970s, so it's really an old technology. Using a variety of technologies 
for wired and unwired broadband--land based and mobile--can make the US 
a leader in communications technology again. Better do it before it's 
too late.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Does your iTouch need to be jailbroken? I thought that was only required 
of the iPhone models. If that is the case I guess I will start paying 
more attention to Android phones.


There's a version of Skype for mobile phones that should work on the 
second generation iPod Touch. I have a 1st gen which needs an external 
microphone that I can either buy for $50 or hack myself with a few parts 
and a soldering gun, plus it needs to be jailbroken. Unlocking your 
GSM WiFi phone may not allow you to use Skype or similar because 
companies like Orange, O2, ATT and T-Mobile have disabled those 
features on their branded WiFi/GSM phones if you don't purchase a data 
package. Of course that makes using mobile VOIP and Skype almost 
pointless anyway.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-01 Thread Judy Cosler
Android phones???

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 Does your iTouch need to be jailbroken? I thought that was only required
 of the iPhone models. If that is the case I guess I will start paying
 more attention to Android phones.


 There's a version of Skype for mobile phones that should work on the
 second generation iPod Touch. I have a 1st gen which needs an external
 microphone that I can either buy for $50 or hack myself with a few parts
 and a soldering gun, plus it needs to be jailbroken. Unlocking your
 GSM WiFi phone may not allow you to use Skype or similar because
 companies like Orange, O2, ATT and T-Mobile have disabled those
 features on their branded WiFi/GSM phones if you don't purchase a data
 package. Of course that makes using mobile VOIP and Skype almost
 pointless anyway.


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Android phones???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Android

MS is apparently spending big bucks to suppress news reports about 
Android. See
roughlydrafted.com/2009/02/18/did-microsoft-kill-android-at-mobile-world-co
ngress-2009/


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
I guess I missed it in the 'article', but where does it say MS is
suppressing news or spending money doing so?

You need to follow the link and read the article. Do I really have to 
explain everything to you?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Mobile VOIP [was: Best Network]

2009-03-01 Thread mike
You can't, the article doesn't have anything about MS paying to or
suppressing news.

HTC said:  When asked about Android, a report by mocoNews in the *Washington
Post* said that company president Peter Chou told reporters, “Google Android
is part of our product portfolio” and that new phones “were coming out in
the future.”

If MS is suppressing and paying off news sources they better do a better
job.  Try reading real websites instead of sticking to the jeff rense/alex
jones model of mac reporting.  Or don't and continue to marginalize yourself
with these strange MFB links.

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 I guess I missed it in the 'article', but where does it say MS is
 suppressing news or spending money doing so?

 You need to follow the link and read the article. Do I really have to
 explain everything to you?


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
Make sure you support your local CarbonONset programs!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*