I'd prefer that Grant close the deal on the name since he is the one with
clout at Apache, but you could do it as well, I suppose - I don't know how
these things really work yet.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 7:04 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Naming status?
The vote made it official, as far as I can tell. If you are referring
to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given
that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality.
Do you or Grant want to do this? Or shall I?
Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to be entered for
INFRASTRUCTURE. No other problem with doing it.
Changing the repository name will yank any changed workareas out from
under the committers, and people who have checkouts. I believe you
can fix this with svn switch. On the other hand, I'd prefer to
finish off a few things first, so I don't risk losing them.
Changing mailing lists and JIRA base name is much more problematic
since we'd lose tickets and history, I think. So I'd prefer to leave
those alone if we can.
Karl
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Where are we as far as making the ManifoldCF name official? Or is it
merely a matter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody
has any major objection?
Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name
official:
1. The repository is still lcf.
2. The wiki top level name is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache
Dashboard.
3. The mailing list names are connectors-.
4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS.
Are there any risks with changing the latter two?
-- Jack Krupansky
