Incubator PMC/Board report for December 2010 (connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org)

2010-12-01 Thread no-reply
Dear Lucene Connector Framework Developers,

This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator 
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.

The board meeting is scheduled for  Wed, 15 December 2010, 12 pm Pacific. The 
report 
for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator 
PMC 
requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to 
allow 
sufficient time for review.

Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and 
subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you 
should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.

Thanks,

The Apache Incubator PMC

Submitting your Report
--

Your report should contain the following:

 * Your project name
 * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the 
project
   or necessarily of its field
 * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards 
   graduation.
 * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of
 * How has the community developed since the last report
 * How has the project developed since the last report.
 
This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:

  http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010

Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is
  created from a template.

Mentors
---
Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the 
Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the 
project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.

Incubator PMC



Re: Release?

2010-12-01 Thread Jack Krupansky

+1

Unfortunately I am maxed out until at least Friday, so there has been no 
chance for me to get to look at it. That said, I won't hold it up. Besides, 
0.1 is mostly testing the process anyway, so we can fix issues in 0.2 as 
well. So, I say go for it, unless somebody really objects.


-- Jack Krupansky

-Original Message- 
From: Karl Wright

Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:47 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release?

Should I just call the vote?  It's been a week...
Karl

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:

Great!
Has anyone else had a chance to look at RC1 yet?  If not, should I
offer gift certificates or something to encourage participation? ;-)

Karl


On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org 
wrote:
I'll take a look, but it won't likely be until Tuesday (extended Turkey 
going on here!)


On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Karl Wright wrote:


Uploaded RC1.
Karl

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:

A problem with the FileNet connector has caused me to build an RC1.
It's uploading now.

Karl

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
That's a great leap forward... RC0 of ManifoldCF 0.1! That's a lot of 
the

hardest of the work.

I'm busy on some other things right now, but maybe next week I can 
take a

look.

-- Jack Krupansky

-Original Message- From: Karl Wright
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:00 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release?

While I was looking for a solution, an upload attempt succeeded!

So there is now an RC0 out on people.apache.org/~kwright:

[kwri...@minotaur:~]$ ls -lt manifoldcf-0.1.*
-rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright 63 Nov 23 17:57
manifoldcf-0.1.tar.gz.md5
-rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright 60 Nov 23 17:57
manifoldcf-0.1.zip.md5
-rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright  158734230 Nov 23 17:55 
manifoldcf-0.1.zip
-rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright  156742315 Nov 23 17:06 
manifoldcf-0.1.tar.gz

[kwri...@minotaur:~]$

Please let me know what you think.
Karl


On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com 
wrote:


The upload has failed repeatedly for me, so I'll clearly have to find
another way.
Karl

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com 
wrote:


I'm uploading a release candidate now.  But someone needs to feed 
the
hamsters turning the wheels or something, because the upload speed 
to

that machine is 51KB/sec, so it's going to take 3 hours to get the
candidate up there, if my network connection doesn't bounce in the
interim.  Is there any other place available?

Karl

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Grant Ingersoll 
gsing...@apache.org

wrote:


On Nov 19, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Karl Wright wrote:


I've created a signing key, and checked in a KEYS file.  Apache
instructions for this are actually decent, so I didn't have to 
make

much stuff up.  Glad about that.



Yep, sorry, have been in meetings.


Last remaining release issue is getting the release files to a
download mirror.  Maybe I can find some doc for that too.



Next steps would be to generate a candidate release which the rest 
of us
can download.  Put it up on people.apache.org/~YOURUSERNAME/... and 
then
send a note to the list saying where to locate it.  Rather than 
call a vote
right away, just ask us to check it out and try it as there will 
likely be
issues for the first release.  Once we all feel we have a decent 
candidate,

we can call a vote, which should be a formality.

See http://apache.org/dev/#releases for more info.





Karl

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
wrote:


The build changes are complete.  I removed the modules level from 
the
hierarchy because it served no useful purpose and complicated 
matters.
 The outer level build.xml now allows you build code, docs, and 
run
tests separately from one another, and gives you help as a 
default.
ant image builds you the deliverable .zip and tar.gz files. 
Online
site has been polished so that it now contains complete javadoc, 
as
does the built and delivered .zip and tar.gz's.  In short,  we 
*could*
actually do a release now, if only we had (and incorporated) the 
KEYS
file I alluded to earlier, which I do not know how to build or 
obtain.
 I believe this needs to be both generated and registered.  The 
site
also needs to refer to a download location/list of mirrors before 
it

could go out the door.

Help? Grant?

Karl

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
wrote:


Hearing nothing, went ahead and made the port of documentation 
to the
site official.  I also now include the generated site in the 
release

tar.gz and .zip.
Issues still to address before release:

(1) source tar.gz and zip in outer-level build.xml, which I will 
try

to address shortly.
(2) vehicle for release downloads, and naming thereof.  In 
short,

where do I put 

Re: Release?

2010-12-01 Thread Karl Wright
I will at least need:
(a) Grant to look at it, to make sure the legal niceties are taken care of, and
(b) Help in getting the images and signature files up to the mirrors

I'll call the vote after (a) is done.
Karl


On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
 +1

 Unfortunately I am maxed out until at least Friday, so there has been no
 chance for me to get to look at it. That said, I won't hold it up. Besides,
 0.1 is mostly testing the process anyway, so we can fix issues in 0.2 as
 well. So, I say go for it, unless somebody really objects.

 -- Jack Krupansky

 -Original Message- From: Karl Wright
 Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:47 AM
 To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Release?

 Should I just call the vote?  It's been a week...
 Karl

 On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:

 Great!
 Has anyone else had a chance to look at RC1 yet?  If not, should I
 offer gift certificates or something to encourage participation? ;-)

 Karl


 On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
 wrote:

 I'll take a look, but it won't likely be until Tuesday (extended Turkey
 going on here!)

 On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Karl Wright wrote:

 Uploaded RC1.
 Karl

 On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:

 A problem with the FileNet connector has caused me to build an RC1.
 It's uploading now.

 Karl

 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Jack Krupansky
 jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:

 That's a great leap forward... RC0 of ManifoldCF 0.1! That's a lot of
 the
 hardest of the work.

 I'm busy on some other things right now, but maybe next week I can
 take a
 look.

 -- Jack Krupansky

 -Original Message- From: Karl Wright
 Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:00 PM
 To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Release?

 While I was looking for a solution, an upload attempt succeeded!

 So there is now an RC0 out on people.apache.org/~kwright:

 [kwri...@minotaur:~]$ ls -lt manifoldcf-0.1.*
 -rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright         63 Nov 23 17:57
 manifoldcf-0.1.tar.gz.md5
 -rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright         60 Nov 23 17:57
 manifoldcf-0.1.zip.md5
 -rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright  158734230 Nov 23 17:55
 manifoldcf-0.1.zip
 -rw-r--r--  1 kwright  kwright  156742315 Nov 23 17:06
 manifoldcf-0.1.tar.gz
 [kwri...@minotaur:~]$

 Please let me know what you think.
 Karl


 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 The upload has failed repeatedly for me, so I'll clearly have to find
 another way.
 Karl

 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I'm uploading a release candidate now.  But someone needs to feed
 the
 hamsters turning the wheels or something, because the upload speed
 to
 that machine is 51KB/sec, so it's going to take 3 hours to get the
 candidate up there, if my network connection doesn't bounce in the
 interim.  Is there any other place available?

 Karl

 On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Grant Ingersoll
 gsing...@apache.org
 wrote:

 On Nov 19, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Karl Wright wrote:

 I've created a signing key, and checked in a KEYS file.  Apache
 instructions for this are actually decent, so I didn't have to
 make
 much stuff up.  Glad about that.


 Yep, sorry, have been in meetings.

 Last remaining release issue is getting the release files to a
 download mirror.  Maybe I can find some doc for that too.


 Next steps would be to generate a candidate release which the rest
 of us
 can download.  Put it up on people.apache.org/~YOURUSERNAME/... and
 then
 send a note to the list saying where to locate it.  Rather than
 call a vote
 right away, just ask us to check it out and try it as there will
 likely be
 issues for the first release.  Once we all feel we have a decent
 candidate,
 we can call a vote, which should be a formality.

 See http://apache.org/dev/#releases for more info.




 Karl

 On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 The build changes are complete.  I removed the modules level from
 the
 hierarchy because it served no useful purpose and complicated
 matters.
  The outer level build.xml now allows you build code, docs, and
 run
 tests separately from one another, and gives you help as a
 default.
 ant image builds you the deliverable .zip and tar.gz files.
 Online
 site has been polished so that it now contains complete javadoc,
 as
 does the built and delivered .zip and tar.gz's.  In short,  we
 *could*
 actually do a release now, if only we had (and incorporated) the
 KEYS
 file I alluded to earlier, which I do not know how to build or
 obtain.
  I believe this needs to be both generated and registered.  The
 site
 also needs to refer to a download location/list of mirrors before
 it
 could go out the door.

 Help? Grant?

 Karl

 On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
 wrote: